IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/socmed/v40y1995i9p1203-1212.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

An economic evaluation of alternative programme designs for tuberculosis control in rural Uganda

Author

Listed:
  • Saunderson, Paul R.

Abstract

Tuberculosis (TB) and AIDS are infections that are among the most feared of all diseases. Both have been widely discussed by the western media in recent months, for a variety of reasons, but it is the combination of the two diseases in an ever increasing number of patients that is causing concern to health planners and health economists. While AIDS is untreatable and prevention of further infection depends largely on changes in sexual behaviour, TB remains eminently treatable. Preventing the spread of TB depends on the effective treatment of active cases, taking 6-12 months, depending on the drugs used. In order to ensure completion of treatment, a programme of registering and following up patients is required. A number of different programme designs are considered and an analysis of both costs and consequences is attempted in order to find the most cost-effective alternative. Data from western Uganda for 1992 are used for the study and the implications of the findings for both Uganda and other African countries are discussed. It is concluded that a programme based on the ambulatory treatment of patients at their nearest health unit, whilst living at home, is the most cost-effective design, largely because of reduced costs to the patients themselves. Specific recommendations are made regarding the implementation of such a programme.

Suggested Citation

  • Saunderson, Paul R., 1995. "An economic evaluation of alternative programme designs for tuberculosis control in rural Uganda," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 40(9), pages 1203-1212, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:40:y:1995:i:9:p:1203-1212
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0277-9536(94)00240-T
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Lucy Cunnama & Gabriela B. Gomez & Mariana Siapka & Ben Herzel & Jeremy Hill & Angela Kairu & Carol Levin & Dickson Okello & Willyanne DeCormier Plosky & Inés Garcia Baena & Sedona Sweeney & Anna Vass, 2020. "A Systematic Review of Methodological Variation in Healthcare Provider Perspective Tuberculosis Costing Papers Conducted in Low- and Middle-Income Settings, Using An Intervention-Standardised Unit Cos," PharmacoEconomics, Springer, vol. 38(8), pages 819-837, August.
    2. Andrew Dillon & Jed Friedman & Pieter Serneels, 2014. "Health information, treatment, and worker productivity: Experimental evidence from malaria testing and treatment among Nigerian sugarcane cutters," Working Paper series, University of East Anglia, Centre for Behavioural and Experimental Social Science (CBESS) 14-05, School of Economics, University of East Anglia, Norwich, UK..
    3. Yoko Laurence & Ulla Griffiths & Anna Vassall, 2015. "Costs to Health Services and the Patient of Treating Tuberculosis: A Systematic Literature Review," PharmacoEconomics, Springer, vol. 33(9), pages 939-955, September.
    4. Damian Walker & Julia A. Fox‐Rushby, 2000. "Economic evaluation of communicable disease interventions in developing countries: a critical review of the published literature," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 9(8), pages 681-698, December.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    tuberculosis costs patients Uganda;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:40:y:1995:i:9:p:1203-1212. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/315/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.