Author
Listed:
- Louisa G. Gordon
(QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, Royal Brisbane Hospital
Queensland University of Technology
The University of Queensland)
- Thomas M. Elliott
(QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, Royal Brisbane Hospital)
- Kate Wakelin
(Unicorn Foundation)
- Simone Leyden
(Unicorn Foundation)
- John Leyden
(Unicorn Foundation)
- Michael Michael
(Neuroendocrine Unit (ENETs Centre of Excellence), Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre)
- Nick Pavlakis
(Royal North Shore Hospital
The University of Sydney)
- Jan Mumford
(CommNETS)
- Eva Segelov
(Monash University and Monash Health)
- David K. Wyld
(Queensland University of Technology
The University of Queensland
Royal Brisbane and Women’s Hospital)
Abstract
Background and Objective Little is known about the economic burden to patients and families with neuroendocrine tumours (NETs) for medical out-of-pocket expenses and employment decisions. This study was performed to determine the extent and factors influencing the financial consequences of living with NETs and their effect on quality of life. Methods We undertook an online cross-sectional survey using a targeted approach and collected Australian Medicare claims data. Validated surveys measured health-related quality of life (EuroQol 5-dimension 5-level [EuroQol-5D-5L]) and financial toxicity (COmprehenSive Financial Toxicity [COST]), supplemented with questions on employment and retirement, insurance and out-of-pocket medical expenses. Generalised linear models were performed to assess determinants of quality of life and out-of-pocket expenses recorded by Medicare. Results The survey was answered by 204 patients with a mean age of 59 years who were diagnosed on average 5.2 years ago. Self-reported mean costs were 1698 Australian dollars ($A) (standard deviation [SD] $A2132) over 3 months (median $A877) and were highest for medical tests (mean $A376 [17% of total costs], SD $A722), travel-related expenses (mean $A289 [13%], SD $A559), and specialist visits (mean $A225 [10%], SD $A342) ($A1 = $US0.69). Imaging scans, surgery and travel expenses were the most common cost burdens reported by patients. Having private health insurance was the key determinant of higher out-of-pocket costs. Poorer quality of life was significantly associated with higher financial toxicity, not working due to cancer, nausea/diarrhoea, two or more co-morbidities and younger age. Conclusions Medical expenses are substantial for some patients with NETs. Quality of life is adversely affected for patients experiencing financial toxicity and avoiding early retirement is an important issue for supportive care services.
Suggested Citation
Louisa G. Gordon & Thomas M. Elliott & Kate Wakelin & Simone Leyden & John Leyden & Michael Michael & Nick Pavlakis & Jan Mumford & Eva Segelov & David K. Wyld, 2020.
"The Economic Impact on Australian Patients with Neuroendocrine Tumours,"
The Patient: Patient-Centered Outcomes Research, Springer;International Academy of Health Preference Research, vol. 13(3), pages 363-373, June.
Handle:
RePEc:spr:patien:v:13:y:2020:i:3:d:10.1007_s40271-020-00412-z
DOI: 10.1007/s40271-020-00412-z
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:patien:v:13:y:2020:i:3:d:10.1007_s40271-020-00412-z. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.