IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/opsear/v58y2021i4d10.1007_s12597-020-00500-6.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

An optimal inventory policy when purchase price follows geometric Brownian motion process

Author

Listed:
  • Suresha Kharvi

    (Mangalore University)

  • T. P. M. Pakkala

    (Mangalore University)

Abstract

In a supply chain management, whenever a retailer purchases goods from a foreign supplier, even though the purchase price remains constant in supplier currency, due to the fluctuation of the exchange rate, the purchase price of the retailer fluctuates. Since the foreign exchange rate keeps changing continuously, the purchase price of the retailer also changes continuously. This not only impacts on total purchase cost but also affects the total holding cost in a price-dependent holding cost inventory model. This article considers an optimal inventory policy for the continuously changing purchase price due to the fluctuation of the exchange rate. The finite horizon inventory model with constant demand and price dependent holding cost is considered. The exchange rate process is modelled by the geometric Brownian motion. The real exchange rate data of INR versus USD is used to estimate the model parameters. The impact of continuously changing purchase price because of the fluctuating exchange rate is identified by comparing the optimal expected cost for the constant and fluctuating purchase price. An alternate stochastic process, namely, the Gaussian process is also examined to model the exchange rate and model solutions are compared with that of solutions obtained by the geometric Brownian motion. The difference in optimal expected cost between the model with the constant purchase price and our model is found for different parametric values through sensitivity analysis. It is found that for larger demands, the difference in the optimal expected cost of the constant and varying price models is more. Coefficient of variations of the total cost for Gaussian process and GBM process are compared and found that GBM performs better than Gaussian process.

Suggested Citation

  • Suresha Kharvi & T. P. M. Pakkala, 2021. "An optimal inventory policy when purchase price follows geometric Brownian motion process," OPSEARCH, Springer;Operational Research Society of India, vol. 58(4), pages 835-851, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:opsear:v:58:y:2021:i:4:d:10.1007_s12597-020-00500-6
    DOI: 10.1007/s12597-020-00500-6
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s12597-020-00500-6
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s12597-020-00500-6?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Taleizadeh, Ata Allah & Pentico, David W., 2013. "An economic order quantity model with a known price increase and partial backordering," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 228(3), pages 516-525.
    2. Benjamin Lev & Howard J. Weiss, 1990. "Inventory Models with Cost Changes," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 38(1), pages 53-63, February.
    3. Erel, E, 1992. "The effect of continuous price change in the EOQ," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 20(4), pages 523-527, July.
    4. Sam G. Taylor & Charles E. Bradley, 1985. "Optimal Ordering Strategies for Announced Price Increases," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 33(2), pages 312-325, April.
    5. Khouja, Moutaz & Goyal, Suresh, 2006. "Single item optimal lot sizing under continuous unit cost decrease," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 102(1), pages 87-94, July.
    6. Khouja, Moutaz & Park, Sungjune, 2003. "Optimal lot sizing under continuous price decrease," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 31(6), pages 539-545, December.
    7. Suresha Kharvi & T. P. M. Pakkala & G. Srinivasan, 2019. "Ordering policies under currency risk sharing agreements: a Markov chain approach," OPSEARCH, Springer;Operational Research Society of India, vol. 56(3), pages 945-964, September.
    8. Wei Huang & Vidyadhar G. Kulkarni & Jayashankar M. Swaminathan, 2003. "Optimal EOQ for Announced Price Increases in Infinite Horizon," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 51(2), pages 336-339, April.
    9. Farooquee, Arsalan Ali & Shrimali, Gireesh, 2016. "Making renewable energy competitive in India: Reducing financing costs via a government-sponsored hedging facility," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 95(C), pages 518-528.
    10. André Gascon, 1995. "On the Finite Horizon EOQ Model with Cost Changes," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 43(4), pages 716-717, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ramasesh, Ranga V., 2010. "Lot-sizing decisions under limited-time price incentives: A review," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 38(3-4), pages 118-135, June.
    2. Suresha Kharvi & T. P. M. Pakkala & G. Srinivasan, 2019. "Ordering policies under currency risk sharing agreements: a Markov chain approach," OPSEARCH, Springer;Operational Research Society of India, vol. 56(3), pages 945-964, September.
    3. Khouja, Moutaz & Park, Sungjune, 2003. "Optimal lot sizing under continuous price decrease," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 31(6), pages 539-545, December.
    4. Sarkar, Biswajit & Saren, Sharmila & Wee, Hui-Ming, 2013. "An inventory model with variable demand, component cost and selling price for deteriorating items," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 30(C), pages 306-310.
    5. Ya Gao & Guangquan Zhang & Jie Lu & Hui-Ming Wee, 2011. "Particle swarm optimization for bi-level pricing problems in supply chains," Journal of Global Optimization, Springer, vol. 51(2), pages 245-254, October.
    6. P C Yang & H M Wee & J C P Yu, 2007. "Collaborative pricing and replenishment policy for hi-tech industry," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 58(7), pages 894-900, July.
    7. Yang, P.C. & Wee, H.M. & Liu, B.S. & Fong, O.K., 2011. "Mitigating Hi-tech products risks due to rapid technological innovation," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 39(4), pages 456-463, August.
    8. Pinçe, Çerağ, 2021. "Forward Buying and Strategic Stockouts," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 289(1), pages 118-131.
    9. Abedinnia, Hamid & Moghaddamkia, Hoda & Glock, C. H., 2016. "A joint economic lot size model under continuously increasing purchase prices of raw materials," Publications of Darmstadt Technical University, Institute for Business Studies (BWL) 82129, Darmstadt Technical University, Department of Business Administration, Economics and Law, Institute for Business Studies (BWL).
    10. Yusen Xia, 2016. "Responding to supplier temporary price discounts in a supply chain through ordering and pricing decisions," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 54(7), pages 1938-1950, April.
    11. Taleizadeh, Ata Allah & Pentico, David W., 2013. "An economic order quantity model with a known price increase and partial backordering," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 228(3), pages 516-525.
    12. Berling, Peter, 2008. "The capital cost of holding inventory with stochastically mean-reverting purchase price," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 186(2), pages 620-636, April.
    13. Shaposhnik, Yaron & Herer, Yale T. & Naseraldin, Hussein, 2015. "Optimal ordering for a probabilistic one-time discount," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 244(3), pages 803-814.
    14. Panda, S. & Modak, N.M. & Sana, S.S. & Basu, M., 2015. "Pricing and replenishment policies in dual-channel supply chain under continuous unit cost decrease," Applied Mathematics and Computation, Elsevier, vol. 256(C), pages 913-929.
    15. Khouja, Moutaz & Goyal, Suresh, 2006. "Single item optimal lot sizing under continuous unit cost decrease," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 102(1), pages 87-94, July.
    16. Taleizadeh, Ata Allah & Zarei, Hamid Reza & Sarker, Bhaba R., 2017. "An optimal control of inventory under probablistic replenishment intervals and known price increase," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 257(3), pages 777-791.
    17. Canyakmaz, Caner & Özekici, Süleyman & Karaesmen, Fikri, 2019. "An inventory model where customer demand is dependent on a stochastic price process," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 212(C), pages 139-152.
    18. Martel, Alain & Gascon, Andre, 1998. "Dynamic lot-sizing with price changes and price-dependent holding costs," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 111(1), pages 114-128, November.
    19. Wei Huang & Vidyadhar G. Kulkarni & Jayashankar M. Swaminathan, 2003. "Optimal EOQ for Announced Price Increases in Infinite Horizon," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 51(2), pages 336-339, April.
    20. Ben A. Chaouch, 2007. "Inventory control and periodic price discounting campaigns," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 54(1), pages 94-108, February.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:opsear:v:58:y:2021:i:4:d:10.1007_s12597-020-00500-6. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.