IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/inm/oropre/v33y1985i2p312-325.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Optimal Ordering Strategies for Announced Price Increases

Author

Listed:
  • Sam G. Taylor

    (The University of Wyoming, Laramie, Wyoming)

  • Charles E. Bradley

    (The University of Wyoming, Laramie, Wyoming)

Abstract

The familiar model for determining the optimal ordering strategy, given an announced price increase, assumes that the buyer has an opportunity to place an order at the end of the next economic order quantity cycle before the price increase takes effect. This paper extends the price increase model by relaxing the requirement on the timing of the price increase. Specifically, we develop optimal ordering strategies for situations where the price increase becomes effective at any future specified time. We also calculate savings for alternate ordering strategies.

Suggested Citation

  • Sam G. Taylor & Charles E. Bradley, 1985. "Optimal Ordering Strategies for Announced Price Increases," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 33(2), pages 312-325, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:inm:oropre:v:33:y:1985:i:2:p:312-325
    DOI: 10.1287/opre.33.2.312
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/opre.33.2.312
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1287/opre.33.2.312?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Ram Rachamadugu & Ranga Ramasesh, 1994. "Suboptimality of equal lot sizes for finite‐horizon problems," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 41(7), pages 1019-1027, December.
    2. Joglekar, Prafulla & Lee, Patrick, 1998. "Comments on: A comparative analysis for determining optimal price and order quantity when a sale increases demand," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 109(1), pages 228-241, August.
    3. Ardalan, Alireza, 1995. "A comparative analysis of approaches for determining optimal price and order quantity when a sale increases demand," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 84(2), pages 416-430, July.
    4. Robert W. Grubbström & Brian G. Kingsman, 2004. "Ordering and Inventory Policies for Step Changes in the Unit Item Cost: A Discounted Cash Flow Approach," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 50(2), pages 253-267, February.
    5. Wang, Yunzeng, 2001. "The optimality of myopic stocking policies for systems with decreasing purchasing prices," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 133(1), pages 153-159, August.
    6. Berling, Peter, 2008. "The capital cost of holding inventory with stochastically mean-reverting purchase price," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 186(2), pages 620-636, April.
    7. Shaposhnik, Yaron & Herer, Yale T. & Naseraldin, Hussein, 2015. "Optimal ordering for a probabilistic one-time discount," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 244(3), pages 803-814.
    8. Goyal, S. K., 1996. "A comment on Martin's: Note on an EOQ model with a temporary sale price," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 43(2-3), pages 283-284, June.
    9. Ben A. Chaouch, 2007. "Inventory control and periodic price discounting campaigns," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 54(1), pages 94-108, February.
    10. Yusen Xia, 2016. "Responding to supplier temporary price discounts in a supply chain through ordering and pricing decisions," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 54(7), pages 1938-1950, April.
    11. Ramasesh, Ranga V. & Rachamadugu, Ram, 2012. "Evaluating lot-sizing strategies under limited-time price incentives: An efficient lower bound," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 138(1), pages 177-182.
    12. Gurnani, Haresh, 1996. "Optimal ordering policies in inventory systems with random demand and random deal offerings," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 95(2), pages 299-312, December.
    13. Khouja, Moutaz & Park, Sungjune, 2003. "Optimal lot sizing under continuous price decrease," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 31(6), pages 539-545, December.
    14. Wei Huang & Vidyadhar G. Kulkarni & Jayashankar M. Swaminathan, 2003. "Optimal EOQ for Announced Price Increases in Infinite Horizon," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 51(2), pages 336-339, April.
    15. Su, Yiqiang & Geunes, Joseph, 2012. "Price promotions, operations cost, and profit in a two-stage supply chain," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 40(6), pages 891-905.
    16. Suresha Kharvi & T. P. M. Pakkala & G. Srinivasan, 2019. "Ordering policies under currency risk sharing agreements: a Markov chain approach," OPSEARCH, Springer;Operational Research Society of India, vol. 56(3), pages 945-964, September.
    17. Mahdi Tajbakhsh, M. & Lee, Chi-Guhn & Zolfaghari, Saeed, 2011. "An inventory model with random discount offerings," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 39(6), pages 710-718, December.
    18. Ramasesh, Ranga V., 2010. "Lot-sizing decisions under limited-time price incentives: A review," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 38(3-4), pages 118-135, June.
    19. Suresha Kharvi & T. P. M. Pakkala, 2021. "An optimal inventory policy when purchase price follows geometric Brownian motion process," OPSEARCH, Springer;Operational Research Society of India, vol. 58(4), pages 835-851, December.
    20. Tersine, Richard J., 1996. "Economic replenishment strategies for announced price increases," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 92(2), pages 266-280, July.
    21. Taleizadeh, Ata Allah & Pentico, David W., 2013. "An economic order quantity model with a known price increase and partial backordering," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 228(3), pages 516-525.
    22. Pinçe, Çerağ, 2021. "Forward Buying and Strategic Stockouts," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 289(1), pages 118-131.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:inm:oropre:v:33:y:1985:i:2:p:312-325. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Asher (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/inforea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.