IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/opsear/v59y2022i1d10.1007_s12597-021-00530-8.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

An analysis of uncertain situation and advance payment system on a double-storage fuzzy inventory model

Author

Listed:
  • S. Rajeswari

    (Queen Mary’s College, University of Madras)

  • C. Sugapriya

    (Queen Mary’s College, University of Madras)

  • D. Nagarajan

    (Hindustan Institute of Technology and Science)

Abstract

The present research develops a two-warehouse economic order quantity (EOQ) model with imperfect products under fuzzy environment. Usually, the acquiring cost for an inventory model should be paid while receiving its receipt. Sometimes the supplier may offer to pay the purchasing amount in advance. Also, the capacity of warehouse plays a vital role in the inventory models. In lockdown situation, there is no supply to the customer throughout the lockdown period and so the inventory level remains stable during that period. This paper scrutinizes the Fuzzy EOQ model with substandard products which incorporates the notion of advance payment, repair option and lockdown situation. The proportion of defective product is considered as triangular fuzzy number. Fuzzy EOQ model is formulated to obtain the optimal order quantity which maximizes the expected annual profit and endorsed with numerical illustration. The sensitivity analysis for the proposed model is performed to show the impact of fuzziness on the proportion of defective rate along with the changes in parameters.

Suggested Citation

  • S. Rajeswari & C. Sugapriya & D. Nagarajan, 2022. "An analysis of uncertain situation and advance payment system on a double-storage fuzzy inventory model," OPSEARCH, Springer;Operational Research Society of India, vol. 59(1), pages 20-40, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:opsear:v:59:y:2022:i:1:d:10.1007_s12597-021-00530-8
    DOI: 10.1007/s12597-021-00530-8
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s12597-021-00530-8
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s12597-021-00530-8?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jaber, Mohamad Y. & Zanoni, Simone & Zavanella, Lucio E., 2014. "Economic order quantity models for imperfect items with buy and repair options," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 155(C), pages 126-131.
    2. Salameh, M. K. & Jaber, M. Y., 2000. "Economic production quantity model for items with imperfect quality," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 64(1-3), pages 59-64, March.
    3. Papachristos, S. & Konstantaras, I., 2006. "Economic ordering quantity models for items with imperfect quality," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 100(1), pages 148-154, March.
    4. Khan, Mehmood & Jaber, Mohamad Y. & Bonney, Maurice, 2011. "An economic order quantity (EOQ) for items with imperfect quality and inspection errors," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 133(1), pages 113-118, September.
    5. Goyal, Suresh Kumar & Cardenas-Barron, Leopoldo Eduardo, 2002. "Note on: Economic production quantity model for items with imperfect quality - a practical approach," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 77(1), pages 85-87, May.
    6. R. Patro & Mitali M. Nayak & M. Acharya, 2019. "An EOQ model for fuzzy defective rate with allowable proportionate discount," OPSEARCH, Springer;Operational Research Society of India, vol. 56(1), pages 191-215, March.
    7. Hsu, Jia-Tzer & Hsu, Lie-Fern, 2013. "An EOQ model with imperfect quality items, inspection errors, shortage backordering, and sales returns," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 143(1), pages 162-170.
    8. Taleizadeh, Ata Allah, 2014. "An EOQ model with partial backordering and advance payments for an evaporating item," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 155(C), pages 185-193.
    9. Sebatjane, Makoena & Adetunji, Olufemi, 2019. "Economic order quantity model for growing items with imperfect quality," Operations Research Perspectives, Elsevier, vol. 6(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Motla, Ritu & Kumar, Ashok & Saxena, Neha & Sana, Shib Sankar, 2023. "Inventory optimization in a green environment with two warehouses," Innovation and Green Development, Elsevier, vol. 2(4).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Leopoldo Eduardo Cárdenas-Barrón & María José Lea Plaza-Makowsky & María Alejandra Sevilla-Roca & José María Núñez-Baumert & Buddhadev Mandal, 2021. "An Inventory Model for Imperfect Quality Products with Rework, Distinct Holding Costs, and Nonlinear Demand Dependent on Price," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 9(12), pages 1-20, June.
    2. Naoufel Cheikhrouhou & Biswajit Sarkar & Baishakhi Ganguly & Asif Iqbal Malik & Rafael Batista & Young Hae Lee, 2018. "Optimization of sample size and order size in an inventory model with quality inspection and return of defective items," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 271(2), pages 445-467, December.
    3. Tapan Kumar Datta, 2017. "Inventory system with defective products and investment opportunity for reducing defective proportion," Operational Research, Springer, vol. 17(1), pages 297-312, April.
    4. Taleizadeh, Ata Allah & Khanbaglo, Mahboobeh Perak Sari & Cárdenas-Barrón, Leopoldo Eduardo, 2016. "An EOQ inventory model with partial backordering and reparation of imperfect products," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 182(C), pages 418-434.
    5. Aditi Khanna & Aakanksha Kishore & Biswajit Sarkar & Chandra K. Jaggi, 2018. "Supply Chain with Customer-Based Two-Level Credit Policies under an Imperfect Quality Environment," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 6(12), pages 1-35, December.
    6. Skouri, K. & Konstantaras, I. & Lagodimos, A.G. & Papachristos, S., 2014. "An EOQ model with backorders and rejection of defective supply batches," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 155(C), pages 148-154.
    7. Lie-Fern Hsu & Jia-Tzer Hsu, 2016. "Economic production quantity (EPQ) models under an imperfect production process with shortages backordered," International Journal of Systems Science, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 47(4), pages 852-867, March.
    8. Hsu, Jia-Tzer & Hsu, Lie-Fern, 2013. "An EOQ model with imperfect quality items, inspection errors, shortage backordering, and sales returns," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 143(1), pages 162-170.
    9. Ivan Darma Wangsa & Hui Ming Wee & Shih-Hsien Tseng, 2019. "A coordinated vendor–buyer system considering loss and damage claims, insurance cost and stochastic lead time," International Journal of System Assurance Engineering and Management, Springer;The Society for Reliability, Engineering Quality and Operations Management (SREQOM),India, and Division of Operation and Maintenance, Lulea University of Technology, Sweden, vol. 10(3), pages 384-398, June.
    10. Javad Asadkhani & Hadi Mokhtari & Saman Tahmasebpoor, 2022. "Optimal lot-sizing under learning effect in inspection errors with different types of imperfect quality items," Operational Research, Springer, vol. 22(3), pages 2631-2665, July.
    11. Jaber, Mohamad Y. & Zanoni, Simone & Zavanella, Lucio E., 2014. "Economic order quantity models for imperfect items with buy and repair options," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 155(C), pages 126-131.
    12. Mehmood Khan & Matloub Hussain & Leopoldo Eduardo Cárdenas-Barrón, 2017. "Learning and screening errors in an EPQ inventory model for supply chains with stochastic lead time demands," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 55(16), pages 4816-4832, August.
    13. Tien-Yu Lin & Kuo-Lung Hou, 2015. "An imperfect quality economic order quantity with advanced receiving," TOP: An Official Journal of the Spanish Society of Statistics and Operations Research, Springer;Sociedad de Estadística e Investigación Operativa, vol. 23(2), pages 535-551, July.
    14. Nasr, Walid W. & Maddah, Bacel & Salameh, Moueen K., 2013. "EOQ with a correlated binomial supply," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 144(1), pages 248-255.
    15. Pal, Brojeswar & Sana, Shib Sankar & Chaudhuri, Kripasindhu, 2014. "Joint pricing and ordering policy for two echelon imperfect production inventory model with two cycles," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 155(C), pages 229-238.
    16. Harun Öztürk, 2019. "Modeling an inventory problem with random supply, inspection and machine breakdown," OPSEARCH, Springer;Operational Research Society of India, vol. 56(2), pages 497-527, June.
    17. Eroglu, Abdullah & Ozdemir, Gultekin, 2007. "An economic order quantity model with defective items and shortages," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 106(2), pages 544-549, April.
    18. Maddah, Bacel & Jaber, Mohamad Y., 2008. "Economic order quantity for items with imperfect quality: Revisited," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 112(2), pages 808-815, April.
    19. Lo, Sh-Tyan & Wee, Hui-Ming & Huang, Wen-Chang, 2007. "An integrated production-inventory model with imperfect production processes and Weibull distribution deterioration under inflation," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 106(1), pages 248-260, March.
    20. Anuraag Gutgutia & J. K. Jha, 2018. "A closed-form solution for the distribution free continuous review integrated inventory model," Operational Research, Springer, vol. 18(1), pages 159-186, April.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:opsear:v:59:y:2022:i:1:d:10.1007_s12597-021-00530-8. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.