IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/operea/v24y2024i2d10.1007_s12351-024-00839-4.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Cooperative investment strategies of ports and shipping companies in blockchain technology

Author

Listed:
  • Huizhu Ju

    (Dalian Maritime University)

  • Qingcheng Zeng

    (Dalian Maritime University)

  • Xiang Chu

    (Dalian Maritime University)

  • Yimeng Li

    (Dalian Maritime University)

Abstract

Blockchain technology promotes the efficiency and transparency of the shipping supply chain, presenting new opportunities and challenges for various maritime stakeholders. To enhance the application of blockchain in the shipping industry, a vertical game model is constructed, involving a port and a shipping company (SP), to analyze the roles of maritime stakeholders and cooperative investment strategies. The study also investigates the impact of time value, investment cost, and blockchain operating cost on price, demand, and profit. Comparative analyses and numerical experiments provide insights into the equilibrium strategy and “free ride” behavior among stakeholders in blockchain adoption. Results indicate: (1) When the time value is higher, investment in blockchain benefits the SP regardless of the blockchain operating cost. The high-efficiency port (HP) should cooperate with the high-time-value SP in blockchain technology investment, while the low-efficiency port (LP) should cooperate with the low-time-value SP. (2) When the blockchain operating cost is lower, the port and the SP are more inclined to cooperate in blockchain technology investment. As the blockchain operating cost increases, the SP becomes proactive in investing to drive blockchain adoption, while the port “free rides”. The SP only exhibits a “free ride” motive when the time cost is low. These findings offer valuable insights for maritime stakeholders in making decisions regarding blockchain adoption.

Suggested Citation

  • Huizhu Ju & Qingcheng Zeng & Xiang Chu & Yimeng Li, 2024. "Cooperative investment strategies of ports and shipping companies in blockchain technology," Operational Research, Springer, vol. 24(2), pages 1-33, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:operea:v:24:y:2024:i:2:d:10.1007_s12351-024-00839-4
    DOI: 10.1007/s12351-024-00839-4
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s12351-024-00839-4
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s12351-024-00839-4?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Vinh V Thai & Devinder Grewal, 2007. "The Maritime Security Management System: Perceptions of the International Shipping Community," Maritime Economics & Logistics, Palgrave Macmillan;International Association of Maritime Economists (IAME), vol. 9(2), pages 119-137, June.
    2. Zhong, Huiling & Zhang, Fa & Gu, Yimiao, 2021. "A Stackelberg game based two-stage framework to make decisions of freight rate for container shipping lines in the emerging blockchain-based market," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 149(C).
    3. Yanling Chang & Eleftherios Iakovou & Weidong Shi, 2020. "Blockchain in global supply chains and cross border trade: a critical synthesis of the state-of-the-art, challenges and opportunities," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 58(7), pages 2082-2099, April.
    4. Nguyen, Son & Shu-Ling Chen, Peggy & Du, Yuquan, 2022. "Risk assessment of maritime container shipping blockchain-integrated systems: An analysis of multi-event scenarios," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 163(C).
    5. Kshetri, Nir, 2018. "1 Blockchain’s roles in meeting key supply chain management objectives," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 39(C), pages 80-89.
    6. Jiang, Yanni & Zhou, Kaile & Lu, Xinhui & Yang, Shanlin, 2020. "Electricity trading pricing among prosumers with game theory-based model in energy blockchain environment," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 271(C).
    7. Papathanasiou, Angeliki & Cole, Rosanna & Murray, Philip, 2020. "The (non-)application of blockchain technology in the Greek shipping industry," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 38(6), pages 927-938.
    8. Wang, Junjin & Liu, Jiaguo & Wang, Fan & Yue, Xiaohang, 2021. "Blockchain technology for port logistics capability: Exclusive or sharing," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 149(C), pages 347-392.
    9. Lingli Wang & Chuanxu Wang & Rongbing Huang, 2022. "Port-based supply chain decisions considering governmental pollution tax," Operational Research, Springer, vol. 22(5), pages 4769-4800, November.
    10. Ilkyeong Moon & Yoon Jea Jeong & Subrata Saha, 2020. "Investment and coordination decisions in a supply chain of fresh agricultural products," Operational Research, Springer, vol. 20(4), pages 2307-2331, December.
    11. Balci, Gökcay & Surucu-Balci, Ebru, 2021. "Blockchain adoption in the maritime supply chain: Examining barriers and salient stakeholders in containerized international trade," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 156(C).
    12. Wanyang Dai, 2022. "Optimal policy computing for blockchain based smart contracts via federated learning," Operational Research, Springer, vol. 22(5), pages 5817-5844, November.
    13. Dong, Gang & Zheng, Shiyuan & Lee, Paul Tae-Woo, 2018. "The effects of regional port integration: The case of Ningbo-Zhoushan Port," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 120(C), pages 1-15.
    14. Qiaoyu Peng & Chuanxu Wang, 2022. "Ship space sharing strategies with different rental modes: How does NVOCCs cooperate with booking platform?," Operational Research, Springer, vol. 22(3), pages 3003-3035, July.
    15. Chen, Hsiao-Chi & Liu, Shi-Miin, 2016. "Should ports expand their facilities under congestion and uncertainty?," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 85(C), pages 109-131.
    16. Lixian Fan & Meifeng Luo, 2013. "Analyzing ship investment behaviour in liner shipping," Maritime Policy & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 40(6), pages 511-533, November.
    17. Anne H. Gausdal & Karen V. Czachorowski & Marina Z. Solesvik, 2018. "Applying Blockchain Technology: Evidence from Norwegian Companies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(6), pages 1-16, June.
    18. Gemma Berenguer & Pinar Keskinocak & J. George Shanthikumar & Jayashankar M. Swaminathan & Luk Van Wassenhove & Özgen Karaer & Tim Kraft & John Khawam, 2017. "Buyer and Nonprofit Levers to Improve Supplier Environmental Performance," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 26(6), pages 1163-1190, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Surucu-Balci, Ebru & Iris, Çağatay & Balci, Gökcay, 2024. "Digital information in maritime supply chains with blockchain and cloud platforms: Supply chain capabilities, barriers, and research opportunities," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 198(C).
    2. Schnelle, Johannes & Schröder, Meike & Kersten, Wolfgang, 2022. "Framework for the adoption of blockchain in maritime cold chains," Chapters from the Proceedings of the Hamburg International Conference of Logistics (HICL), in: Kersten, Wolfgang & Jahn, Carlos & Blecker, Thorsten & Ringle, Christian M. (ed.), Changing Tides: The New Role of Resilience and Sustainability in Logistics and Supply Chain Management – Innovative Approaches for the Shift to a New , volume 33, pages 121-148, Hamburg University of Technology (TUHH), Institute of Business Logistics and General Management.
    3. Lu, Bo & Xu, Xin, 2024. "Digital transformation and port operations: Optimal investment under incomplete information," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 151(C), pages 134-146.
    4. Manu Sharma & Sudhanshu Joshi & Sunil Luthra & Anil Kumar, 2022. "Managing disruptions and risks amidst COVID-19 outbreaks: role of blockchain technology in developing resilient food supply chains," Operations Management Research, Springer, vol. 15(1), pages 268-281, June.
    5. Song, Zhuzhu & Tang, Wansheng & Zhao, Ruiqing, 2018. "Cooperation mode for a liner company with heterogeneous ports: Business cooperation vs. port investment," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 118(C), pages 513-533.
    6. Archana A Mukherjee & Rajesh Kumar Singh & Ruchi Mishra & Surajit Bag, 2022. "Application of blockchain technology for sustainability development in agricultural supply chain: justification framework," Operations Management Research, Springer, vol. 15(1), pages 46-61, June.
    7. Nguyen, Son & Shu-Ling Chen, Peggy & Du, Yuquan, 2022. "Risk assessment of maritime container shipping blockchain-integrated systems: An analysis of multi-event scenarios," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 163(C).
    8. Zhang, Jian & Zhang, Xuanjian & Liu, Wei & Ji, Ming & Mishra, Arunodaya Raj, 2022. "Critical success factors of blockchain technology to implement the sustainable supply chain using an extended decision-making approach," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 182(C).
    9. Balci, Gökcay & Surucu-Balci, Ebru, 2021. "Blockchain adoption in the maritime supply chain: Examining barriers and salient stakeholders in containerized international trade," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 156(C).
    10. Davies, Jennifer & Sharifi, Hossein & Lyons, Andrew & Forster, Rick & Elsayed, Omar Khaled Shokry Mohamed, 2024. "Non-fungible tokens: The missing ingredient for sustainable supply chains in the metaverse age?," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 182(C).
    11. Kirti Nayal & Rakesh D. Raut & Balkrishna E. Narkhede & Pragati Priyadarshinee & Gajanan B. Panchal & Vidyadhar V. Gedam, 2023. "Antecedents for blockchain technology-enabled sustainable agriculture supply chain," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 327(1), pages 293-337, August.
    12. Haiyan Luo & Junlin Pan, 2022. "Information Sharing Game and Value Analysis for the Following Enterprise Applications of Blockchain Technology," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(23), pages 1-22, December.
    13. Tiwari, Sunil & Sharma, Pankaj & Choi, Tsan-Ming & Lim, Andrew, 2023. "Blockchain and third-party logistics for global supply chain operations: Stakeholders’ perspectives and decision roadmap," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 170(C).
    14. Ysé Commandré & Catherine Macombe & Sophie Mignon, 2021. "Implications for Agricultural Producers of Using Blockchain for Food Transparency, Study of 4 Food Chains by Cumulative Approach," Post-Print hal-03351947, HAL.
    15. Xu, Haonan & Liu, Jiaguo & Xu, Xiaofeng & Chen, Jihong & Yue, Xiaohang, 2024. "The impact of AI technology adoption on operational decision-making in competitive heterogeneous ports☆," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 183(C).
    16. Kumar, Sourabh & Barua, Mukesh Kumar, 2023. "Exploring the hyperledger blockchain technology disruption and barriers of blockchain adoption in petroleum supply chain," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 81(C).
    17. Qingyu Zhang & Salman Khan & Safeer Ullah Khan & Ikram Ullah Khan, 2023. "Understanding Blockchain Technology Adoption in Operation and Supply Chain Management of Pakistan: Extending UTAUT Model With Technology Readiness, Technology Affinity and Trust," SAGE Open, , vol. 13(4), pages 21582440231, October.
    18. Ulpan Tokkozhina & Ana Lucia Martins & Joao C. Ferreira, 2023. "Uncovering dimensions of the impact of blockchain technology in supply chain management," Operations Management Research, Springer, vol. 16(1), pages 99-125, March.
    19. Abderahman Rejeb & Karim Rejeb & Steve Simske & Horst Treiblmaier, 2021. "Blockchain Technologies in Logistics and Supply Chain Management: A Bibliometric Review," Logistics, MDPI, vol. 5(4), pages 1-28, October.
    20. Dimitris Gavalas & Theodoros Syriopoulos & Efthimios Roumpis, 2022. "Digital adoption and efficiency in the maritime industry," Journal of Shipping and Trade, Springer, vol. 7(1), pages 1-22, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:operea:v:24:y:2024:i:2:d:10.1007_s12351-024-00839-4. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.