IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/nathaz/v99y2019i2d10.1007_s11069-019-03770-6.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Groundwater quality evaluation using a classification model: a case study of Jilin City, China

Author

Listed:
  • Baizhong Yan

    (Hebei Key Laboratory of Geological Resources and Environment Monitoring and Protection
    Hebei GEO University)

  • Furong Yu

    (China University of Geosciences
    North China University of Water Resources and Electric Power)

  • Xiao Xiao

    (Hebei Key Laboratory of Geological Resources and Environment Monitoring and Protection
    Hebei GEO University)

  • Xinzhou Wang

    (Hebei Key Laboratory of Geological Resources and Environment Monitoring and Protection)

Abstract

Using the MATLAB™ platform, groundwater quality in Jilin, China, is evaluated by employing integrated- and automation-type models. Genetic algorithm (GA), particle swarm optimisation, and support vector machine (SVM) theory are coupled in the model to form two-layer loop nesting. By using a GA, the surrounding loop enters the inner loop by choosing some factors from all measured evaluation factors. The inner loop is mainly composed of the SVM model. The inner loop feeds back the fitness function value of the GA obtained by weighting the model classification accuracy, and the reduced dimensions of each evaluation factor, to the surrounding loop. This aims to adjust the direction of evolution of the GA and eliminate evaluation factors with redundant, or sparse, information. The established model is applied to evaluate groundwater quality in Jilin and reduces 16 original evaluation factors to nine through a dimensionality reduction method. The training and verification sets constructed in the model exhibit more than 95% accuracy. Among the 183 wells used for monitoring groundwater in Jilin, the numbers of I-, II-, III-, IV-, and V-type monitoring wells are two, 96, 61, 20, and four, respectively. Compared with ordinary methods of evaluating water quality, the method integrates data selection and data processing instead of performing it in two successive substeps. The method exhibits the significant effect of dimensionality reduction on the number of its evaluation factors and also shows accurate evaluation results for water quality samples. Moreover, the method’s ability to be applied in many conditions provides a good basis for its use in various classification problems including water quality evaluation.

Suggested Citation

  • Baizhong Yan & Furong Yu & Xiao Xiao & Xinzhou Wang, 2019. "Groundwater quality evaluation using a classification model: a case study of Jilin City, China," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 99(2), pages 735-751, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:nathaz:v:99:y:2019:i:2:d:10.1007_s11069-019-03770-6
    DOI: 10.1007/s11069-019-03770-6
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11069-019-03770-6
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s11069-019-03770-6?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Pawlak, Zdzislaw, 1997. "Rough set approach to knowledge-based decision support," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 99(1), pages 48-57, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Naser Shiri & Jalal Shiri & Zaher Mundher Yaseen & Sungwon Kim & Il-Moon Chung & Vahid Nourani & Mohammad Zounemat-Kermani, 2021. "Development of artificial intelligence models for well groundwater quality simulation: Different modeling scenarios," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 16(5), pages 1-24, May.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Nijkamp, Peter & Poot, Jacques, 2015. "Cultural Diversity: A Matter of Measurement," IZA Discussion Papers 8782, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
    2. Maurizio d’Amato, 2007. "Comparing Rough Set Theory with Multiple Regression Analysis as Automated Valuation Methodologies," International Real Estate Review, Global Social Science Institute, vol. 10(2), pages 42-65.
    3. Salvatore Barbagallo & Simona Consoli & Nello Pappalardo & Salvatore Greco & Santo Zimbone, 2006. "Discovering Reservoir Operating Rules by a Rough Set Approach," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 20(1), pages 19-36, February.
    4. Alessandro Scuderi & Luisa Sturiale & Giuseppe Timpanaro & Agata Matarazzo & Silvia Zingale & Paolo Guarnaccia, 2022. "A Model to Support Sustainable Resource Management in the “Etna River Valleys” Biosphere Reserve: The Dominance-Based Rough Set Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-19, April.
    5. Si-Hui Dong & Hui-Cheng Zhou & Hai-Jun Xu, 2004. "A Forecast Model of Hydrologic Single Element Medium and Long-Period Based on Rough Set Theory," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 18(5), pages 483-495, October.
    6. Mi, Yunlong & Wang, Zongrun & Quan, Pei & Shi, Yong, 2024. "A semi-supervised concept-cognitive computing system for dynamic classification decision making with limited feedback information," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 315(3), pages 1123-1138.
    7. Gülgönül Bozoğlu Batı & İsmail Hakkı Armutlulu, 2020. "Work and family conflict analysis of female entrepreneurs in Turkey and classification with rough set theory," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 7(1), pages 1-12, December.
    8. Chen, Li-Fei & Tsai, Chih-Tsung, 2016. "Data mining framework based on rough set theory to improve location selection decisions: A case study of a restaurant chain," Tourism Management, Elsevier, vol. 53(C), pages 197-206.
    9. Kiluk, S., 2014. "Dynamic classification system in large-scale supervision of energy efficiency in buildings," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 132(C), pages 1-14.
    10. Ching-Hsue Cheng & Ssu-Hsiang Wang, 2015. "A quarterly time-series classifier based on a reduced-dimension generated rules method for identifying financial distress," Quantitative Finance, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 15(12), pages 1979-1994, December.
    11. Junyi Wu & Shari Shang, 2020. "Managing Uncertainty in AI-Enabled Decision Making and Achieving Sustainability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(21), pages 1-17, October.
    12. Peter Goodings Swartz & P Christopher Zegras, 2013. "Strategically Robust Urban Planning? A Demonstration of Concept," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 40(5), pages 829-845, October.
    13. Gift Dumedah & Nadine Schuurman, 2008. "Minimizing the effects of inaccurate sediment description in borehole data using rough sets and transition probability," Journal of Geographical Systems, Springer, vol. 10(3), pages 291-315, September.
    14. Suresh Dara & Haider Banka & Chandra Sekhara Rao Annavarapu, 2017. "A Rough Based Hybrid Binary PSO Algorithm for Flat Feature Selection and Classification in Gene Expression Data," Annals of Data Science, Springer, vol. 4(3), pages 341-360, September.
    15. Sarah Ben Amor & Fateh Belaid & Ramzi Benkraiem & Boumediene Ramdani & Khaled Guesmi, 2023. "Multi-criteria classification, sorting, and clustering: a bibliometric review and research agenda," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 325(2), pages 771-793, June.
    16. Min-Hsiung Wei & Ching-Hsue Cheng & Chung-Shih Huang & Po-Chang Chiang, 2013. "Discovering medical quality of total hip arthroplasty by rough set classifier with imbalanced class," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 47(3), pages 1761-1779, April.
    17. Stelios Bekiros & Nikolaos Loukeris & Nikolaos Matsatsinis & Frank Bezzina, 2019. "Customer Satisfaction Prediction in the Shipping Industry with Hybrid Meta-heuristic Approaches," Computational Economics, Springer;Society for Computational Economics, vol. 54(2), pages 647-667, August.
    18. Weijie Wang & Wei Wang & Moon Namgung, 2010. "Linking People's Perceptions and Physical Components of Sidewalk Environments—An Application of Rough Sets Theory," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 37(2), pages 234-247, April.
    19. Greco, Salvatore & Matarazzo, Benedetto & Slowinski, Roman, 2001. "Rough sets theory for multicriteria decision analysis," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 129(1), pages 1-47, February.
    20. Lutz, Lotte Marie & Fischer, Lisa-Britt & Newig, Jens & Lang, Daniel Johannes, 2017. "Driving factors for the regional implementation of renewable energy ‐ A multiple case study on the German energy transition," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 105(C), pages 136-147.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:nathaz:v:99:y:2019:i:2:d:10.1007_s11069-019-03770-6. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.