IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/nathaz/v91y2018i3d10.1007_s11069-018-3176-4.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Laboratory tests and numerical simulations on the impact of subsurface barriers to saltwater intrusion

Author

Listed:
  • Fu-lin Li

    (Water Resources Research Institute of Shandong Province)

  • Xue-qun Chen

    (Water Resources Research Institute of Shandong Province)

  • Cai-hong Liu

    (Water Resources Research Institute of Shandong Province)

  • Yan-qing Lian

    (University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign)

  • Li He

    (Water Resources Research Institute of Shandong Province)

Abstract

Subsurface barriers have been used as one of the engineering measures to prevent saltwater intrusion in the coastal aquifers in China. However, the effectiveness of those barriers has not been studied thoroughly. In this research, comparative studies using sandbox test as a physical model and the FEFLOW-based groundwater numerical model were conducted for better understanding of the dynamic processes of saltwater intrusion with and without subsurface barriers. Both laboratory tests and numerical simulation without subsurface barriers showed that the saltwater front intruded to 18, 55 and 63 in the aquifer in 10, 20 and 40 min, respectively. The impact of the different permeability of the subsurface barriers to the migration distance and diffusion of saltwater front was also tested in the laboratory and simulated by using the two-dimensional numerical model. Results showed the saltwater front could still pass through the subsurface barrier and continued moving forward when the permeability K of the subsurface barriers was 9.9 × 10−7 m/s. When the K of the subsurface barriers was 1.3 × 10−7 m/s, the salt–front passed through the subsurface barrier in 40 min, and the migration rate of the salt–fresh water interface did not change in 70 min. When the K was 3.7 × 10−8 m/s, the saltwater front could not go through the subsurface barriers. These research results indicated that the subsurface barriers with low permeability (K = 3.7 × 10−8 m/s) could prevent the saltwater intrusion effectively. The results of this case study provide important practical significance for the prevention of saltwater intrusion in coastal areas.

Suggested Citation

  • Fu-lin Li & Xue-qun Chen & Cai-hong Liu & Yan-qing Lian & Li He, 2018. "Laboratory tests and numerical simulations on the impact of subsurface barriers to saltwater intrusion," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 91(3), pages 1223-1235, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:nathaz:v:91:y:2018:i:3:d:10.1007_s11069-018-3176-4
    DOI: 10.1007/s11069-018-3176-4
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11069-018-3176-4
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s11069-018-3176-4?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Hany Abd-Elhamid & Akbar Javadi, 2011. "A Cost-Effective Method to Control Seawater Intrusion in Coastal Aquifers," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 25(11), pages 2755-2780, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Mamoon Ismail & Soni M. Pradhanang & Thomas Boving & Sophia Motta & Brendan McCarron & Ashley Volk, 2024. "Review of Modeling Approaches at the Freshwater and Saltwater interface in Coastal Aquifers," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(8), pages 1-23, August.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Koen G. Zuurbier & Klaasjan J. Raat & Marcel Paalman & Ate T. Oosterhof & Pieter J. Stuyfzand, 2017. "How Subsurface Water Technologies (SWT) can Provide Robust, Effective, and Cost-Efficient Solutions for Freshwater Management in Coastal Zones," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 31(2), pages 671-687, January.
    2. Ismail Abd-Elaty & Lorenzo Pugliese & Salvatore Straface, 2022. "Inclined Physical Subsurface Barriers for Saltwater Intrusion Management in Coastal Aquifers," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 36(9), pages 2973-2987, July.
    3. Jialiang Cai & Thomas Taute & Michael Schneider, 2015. "Recommendations of Controlling Saltwater Intrusion in an Inland Aquifer for Drinking-Water Supply at a Certain Waterworks Site in Berlin (Germany)," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 29(7), pages 2221-2232, May.
    4. Jose-Luis Molina & Raziyeh Farmani & John Bromley, 2011. "Aquifers Management through Evolutionary Bayesian Networks: The Altiplano Case Study (SE Spain)," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 25(14), pages 3883-3909, November.
    5. Ammar Ahmed Musa, 2021. "Goal programming model for optimal water allocation of limited resources under increasing demands," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 23(4), pages 5956-5984, April.
    6. Mohsen Sherif & Anvar Kacimov & Akbar Javadi & Abdel Ebraheem, 2012. "Modeling Groundwater Flow and Seawater Intrusion in the Coastal Aquifer of Wadi Ham, UAE," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 26(3), pages 751-774, February.
    7. Subhajit Dey & Om Prakash, 2022. "Coupled Sharp-interface and Density-dependent Model for Simultaneous Optimization of Production Well Locations and Pumping in Coastal Aquifer," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 36(7), pages 2327-2341, May.
    8. Yasser Ahmed Hamed & Hiroshi Yasuda & Magnus Persson & Ronny Berndtsson & Xin-ping Wang, 2015. "Modeling Solute Transport by DLA in Soils of Northeastern Egypt," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(3), pages 1-15, March.
    9. Akbar Javadi & Mohammed Hussain & Mohsen Sherif & Raziyeh Farmani, 2015. "Multi-objective Optimization of Different Management Scenarios to Control Seawater Intrusion in Coastal Aquifers," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 29(6), pages 1843-1857, April.
    10. Asaad M. Armanuos & Nadhir Al-Ansari & Zaher Mundher Yaseen, 2020. "Assessing the Effectiveness of Using Recharge Wells for Controlling the Saltwater Intrusion in Unconfined Coastal Aquifers with Sloping Beds: Numerical Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(7), pages 1-26, March.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:nathaz:v:91:y:2018:i:3:d:10.1007_s11069-018-3176-4. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.