IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/nathaz/v74y2014i3p2229-2250.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Earthquake risk assessment in urban fabrics based on physical, socioeconomic and response capacity parameters (a case study: Tehran city)

Author

Listed:
  • M. Hajibabaee
  • K. Amini-Hosseini
  • M. Ghayamghamian

Abstract

Determination of the priorities for improvement of vulnerable urban fabrics based on a comprehensive assessment is among the main desires of local governments in earthquake-prone countries like Iran. However, in most countries, the comprehensive and absolute estimation of seismic risk is not possible due to shortages of the required data. In this paper, a new method is proposed for estimation of the risk through combination of hazard, vulnerability and response capacity indicators. Also, new evaluation methods based on relative scheme are presented for simple quantification of indicators in urban areas suffering from limited or insufficient database. For this purpose, important vulnerability parameters at urban areas are classified into physical, human life and socioeconomic groups. New hazard factors are also defined to evaluate the risk through combination of each vulnerability indicator and its directly related hazard factor. In addition, the capacity of response activities is accounted for in the model using planning, resource, accessibility and evacuation capacity indicators. The post-earthquake reduction of response capacity is also measured by means of reduction factors. Then, total relative seismic risk index is defined and calculated at each urban division (or zone) by weighted combination of the mentioned risk and response capacity indicators. This index represents the state of the risk in each zone in comparison with the others. The proposed method is applied to assess the earthquake risk at 22 municipal districts of Tehran. The results show that physical, human life and overall risk indices in district 15 of the city are considerably greater than the others. Meanwhile, in socioeconomic aspects, district 6 has the highest risk. Also, the analysis of the results demonstrates the major contribution of the response capacity term to determine the mitigation priorities. Finally, the results are compared with JICA ( 2000 ), using the same data, to show the efficiency of the proposed model. It is shown that the introduced method can significantly improve the results of the risk estimation and mitigation priorities. Copyright Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2014

Suggested Citation

  • M. Hajibabaee & K. Amini-Hosseini & M. Ghayamghamian, 2014. "Earthquake risk assessment in urban fabrics based on physical, socioeconomic and response capacity parameters (a case study: Tehran city)," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 74(3), pages 2229-2250, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:nathaz:v:74:y:2014:i:3:p:2229-2250
    DOI: 10.1007/s11069-014-1300-7
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1007/s11069-014-1300-7
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s11069-014-1300-7?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Martha-Liliana Carreño & Omar Cardona & Alex Barbat, 2007. "Urban Seismic Risk Evaluation: A Holistic Approach," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 40(1), pages 137-172, January.
    2. repec:idb:brikps:publication-detail,7101.html?id=68568 is not listed on IDEAS
    3. H. Duzgun & M. Yucemen & H. Kalaycioglu & K. Celik & S. Kemec & K. Ertugay & A. Deniz, 2011. "An integrated earthquake vulnerability assessment framework for urban areas," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 59(2), pages 917-947, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Diana L. Jaimes & Christian R. Escudero & Karen L. Flores & Araceli Zamora-Camacho, 2023. "Multicriteria seismic hazard and social vulnerability assessment in the Puerto Vallarta metropolitan area, Mexico: toward a comprehensive seismic risk analysis," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 116(2), pages 2671-2692, March.
    2. Ting Wang & Linsheng Yang & Shaohong Wu & Jiangbo Gao & Binggan Wei, 2020. "Quantitative Assessment of Natural Disaster Coping Capacity: An Application for Typhoons," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(15), pages 1-16, July.
    3. Hooman Motamed & Mohsen Ghafory-Ashtiany & Kambod Amini-Hosseini & Babak Mansouri & Bijan Khazai, 2020. "Earthquake risk–sensitive model for urban land use planning," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 103(1), pages 87-102, August.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Hung-Chih Hung & Ming-Chin Ho & Yi-Jie Chen & Chang-Yi Chian & Su-Ying Chen, 2013. "Integrating long-term seismic risk changes into improving emergency response and land-use planning: a case study for the Hsinchu City, Taiwan," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 69(1), pages 491-508, October.
    2. Omar Hamdy & Hanan Gaber & Mohamed S. Abdalzaher & Mahmoud Elhadidy, 2022. "Identifying Exposure of Urban Area to Certain Seismic Hazard Using Machine Learning and GIS: A Case Study of Greater Cairo," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(17), pages 1-24, August.
    3. Laura Melelli, 2019. "“Perugia Upside-Down”: A Multimedia Exhibition in Umbria (Central Italy) for Improving Geoheritage and Geotourism in Urban Areas," Resources, MDPI, vol. 8(3), pages 1-22, August.
    4. Armando Aguilar-Meléndez & Lluis G. Pujades & Alex H. Barbat & Marisol Monterrubio-Velasco & Josep Puente & Nieves Lantada, 2022. "Comparative analysis of a new assessment of the seismic risk of residential buildings of two districts of Barcelona," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 110(3), pages 1649-1691, February.
    5. Zhen Xu & Xinzheng Lu & Hong Guan & Bo Han & Aizhu Ren, 2014. "Seismic damage simulation in urban areas based on a high-fidelity structural model and a physics engine," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 71(3), pages 1679-1693, April.
    6. Seunghoo Jeong & Byeong Je Kim & Young‐Joo Lee & Ji‐Bum Chung & Sung‐Han Sim, 2020. "Individual Disaster Assistance For Socially Vulnerable People: Lessons Learned From the Pohang Earthquake in the Republic of Korea," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 40(11), pages 2373-2389, November.
    7. Cuneyt Yavuz & Elcin Kentel & Mustafa M. Aral, 2020. "Tsunami risk assessment: economic, environmental and social dimensions," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 104(2), pages 1413-1442, November.
    8. Anwar, Ghazanfar Ali & Zhang, Xiaoge, 2024. "Deep reinforcement learning for intelligent risk optimization of buildings under hazard," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 247(C).
    9. Lallau, Benoît & Thibaut, Estelle, 2009. "La résilience en débat : quel devenir pour les agriculteurs en difficulté ?," Review of Agricultural and Environmental Studies - Revue d'Etudes en Agriculture et Environnement (RAEStud), Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique (INRA), vol. 90(1).
    10. Waseem Ul Hameed & Muhammad Haseeb & Jawad Iqbal & Leonardus W. W. Mihardjo & Kittisak Jermsittiparsert, 2022. "Environmental disaster and women self‐sustainability—A survey study on microfinance female clientele in Pakistan," International Journal of Finance & Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 27(3), pages 3599-3622, July.
    11. Benedetta Baldassarre & Elisa Conticelli & Angela Santangelo, 2024. "Planning for More Resilient and Safer Cities: A New Methodology for Seismic Risk Assessment at the Urban Scale, Applied to a Case Study in Italy," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(5), pages 1-26, February.
    12. Guohua Chen & Qin Yang & Xuexi Chen & Kongxing Huang & Tao Zeng & Zhi Yuan, 2021. "Methodology of Urban Safety and Security Assessment Based on the Overall Risk Management Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(12), pages 1-26, June.
    13. Azucena Román-de la Sancha & Rodolfo Silva, 2020. "Multivariable Analysis of Transport Network Seismic Performance: Mexico City," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(22), pages 1-40, November.
    14. Sepehr Marzi & Jaroslav Mysiak & Arthur H Essenfelder & Mattia Amadio & Silvio Giove & Alexander Fekete, 2019. "Constructing a comprehensive disaster resilience index: The case of Italy," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(9), pages 1-23, September.
    15. Christian Geiß & Hannes Taubenböck, 2013. "Remote sensing contributing to assess earthquake risk: from a literature review towards a roadmap," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 68(1), pages 7-48, August.
    16. Blake Walker & Cameron Taylor-Noonan & Alan Tabbernor & T’Brenn McKinnon & Harsimran Bal & Dan Bradley & Nadine Schuurman & John Clague, 2014. "A multi-criteria evaluation model of earthquake vulnerability in Victoria, British Columbia," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 74(2), pages 1209-1222, November.
    17. Navdeep Agrawal & Laxmi Gupta & Jagabandhu Dixit, 2021. "Assessment of the Socioeconomic Vulnerability to Seismic Hazards in the National Capital Region of India Using Factor Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(17), pages 1-19, August.
    18. Shutian Zhou & Guofang Zhai, 2023. "A Multi-Hazard Risk Assessment Framework for Urban Disaster Prevention Planning: A Case Study of Xiamen, China," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(10), pages 1-19, October.
    19. Benoît Lallau & Estelle Thibaut, 2009. "La résilience en débat : quel devenir pour les agriculteurs en difficulté ?," Review of Agricultural and Environmental Studies - Revue d'Etudes en Agriculture et Environnement, INRA Department of Economics, vol. 90(1), pages 79-102.
    20. Maria Rosa Trovato & Vittoria Ventura & Monia Lanzafame & Salvatore Giuffrida & Ludovica Nasca, 2024. "Seismic–Energy Retrofit as Information-Value: Axiological Programming for the Ecological Transition," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(6), pages 1-37, March.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:nathaz:v:74:y:2014:i:3:p:2229-2250. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.