IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/nathaz/v120y2024i15d10.1007_s11069-024-06836-2.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

State-of-the-art review on stability and serviceability of dikes as a flood infrastructure and their comprehensive assessment in Indus Plain considering global climate change

Author

Listed:
  • Hasan Gul

    (Czech Technical University in Prague)

  • Nauman Ijaz

    (Quanzhou University of Information Engineering)

  • Ivan Vanicek

    (Czech Technical University in Prague)

  • Zia ur Rehman

    (University of Portsmouth)

  • Zain Ijaz

    (Tongji University)

  • Ghulam Zakir Hassan

    (Government of Punjab)

  • Shahzad Abdul Rahim

    (Government of Punjab)

Abstract

In the wake of escalating climate change impacts, Pakistan’s flood defense infrastructure, which is mainly comprised of dike systems, is now facing unprecedented problems. This article explores the many intricate aspects of dike resilience in the context of heightened flood risk intensified by global warming. The study provides a comprehensive insight into the current state of dike structures in Pakistan by carefully integrating the real-time data from site visits that includes comprehensive field and laboratory testing, detailed case studies, and substantial literature evaluation. This study does a thorough analysis of how unusual weather patterns impact the occurrence of floods, classifies floods based on return periods, and illuminates the role of dikes in territorial safeguarding. The geotechnical assessment of specific dikes offers valuable information about their condition and performance, while the contemporary cross-sections give a glimpse into their design effectiveness. Examining instances of dike collapses via case studies reveals the underlying weaknesses and thresholds in the light of the limit state as defined by the Euro Code, hence shaping the discourse on possible corrective measures. Further, this study highlights the potential applications of secondary materials and promotes the implementation of sustainable flood protection structures as additional aspects of dike management and flood mitigation. The synthesis of research results provides a bench mark and establishes a foundation for a proactive approach to flood prevention, emphasizing the need for durable, flexible, and robust flood control systems to defend against the imminent danger of climate-driven hydrological extremes.

Suggested Citation

  • Hasan Gul & Nauman Ijaz & Ivan Vanicek & Zia ur Rehman & Zain Ijaz & Ghulam Zakir Hassan & Shahzad Abdul Rahim, 2024. "State-of-the-art review on stability and serviceability of dikes as a flood infrastructure and their comprehensive assessment in Indus Plain considering global climate change," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 120(15), pages 13757-13809, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:nathaz:v:120:y:2024:i:15:d:10.1007_s11069-024-06836-2
    DOI: 10.1007/s11069-024-06836-2
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11069-024-06836-2
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s11069-024-06836-2?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Masoumeh Behrouz & Saeed Alimohammadi, 2016. "Risk-Based Design of Flood Control Systems Considering Multiple Dependent Uncertainties," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 30(13), pages 4529-4558, October.
    2. Javad Ahadiyan & Farhad Bahmanpouri & Atefeh Adeli & Carlo Gualtieri & Alireza Khoshkonesh, 2022. "Riprap Effect on Hydraulic Fracturing Process of Cohesive and Non-cohesive Protective Levees," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 36(2), pages 625-639, January.
    3. Asadullah Kazi, 2014. "A review of the assessment and mitigation of floods in Sindh, Pakistan," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 70(1), pages 839-864, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Sang Ug Kim & Cheol-Eung Lee, 2021. "Incorporation of Cost-Benefit Analysis Considering Epistemic Uncertainty for Calculating the Optimal Design Flood," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 35(2), pages 757-774, January.
    2. Ameer Hyder & Nasir Iqbal, 2016. "Socio-Economic Losses of Flood and Household’s Coping Strategies: Evidence from Flood Prone District of Pakistan," PIDE-Working Papers 2016:142, Pakistan Institute of Development Economics.
    3. Salman Atif & Muhammad Umar & Fahim Ullah, 2021. "Investigating the flood damages in Lower Indus Basin since 2000: Spatiotemporal analyses of the major flood events," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 108(2), pages 2357-2383, September.
    4. Asif Iqbal & Syed Ahmad Hassan, 2018. "ENSO and IOD analysis on the occurrence of floods in Pakistan," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 91(3), pages 879-890, April.
    5. Irfan Ahmad Rana & Jayant K. Routray, 2018. "Integrated methodology for flood risk assessment and application in urban communities of Pakistan," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 91(1), pages 239-266, March.
    6. Azhar Abbas & T. Amjath-Babu & Harald Kächele & Klaus Müller, 2015. "Non-structural flood risk mitigation under developing country conditions: an analysis on the determinants of willingness to pay for flood insurance in rural Pakistan," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 75(3), pages 2119-2135, February.
    7. Saeed Alimohammadi & Masoume Behrouz, 2021. "Stochastic Design of Flood Control Systems; Uncertainty Propagation and Results Representation," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 35(13), pages 4457-4476, October.
    8. Javad Ahadiyan & Farhad Bahmanpouri & Atefeh Adeli & Carlo Gualtieri & Alireza Khoshkonesh, 2022. "Riprap Effect on Hydraulic Fracturing Process of Cohesive and Non-cohesive Protective Levees," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 36(2), pages 625-639, January.
    9. Daniel P. Loucks, 2017. "Managing Water as a Critical Component of a Changing World," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 31(10), pages 2905-2916, August.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:nathaz:v:120:y:2024:i:15:d:10.1007_s11069-024-06836-2. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.