IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/metrik/v85y2022i7d10.1007_s00184-021-00851-0.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A note on the coverage behaviour of bootstrap percentile confidence intervals for constrained parameters

Author

Listed:
  • Chunlin Wang

    (Xiamen University)

  • Paul Marriott

    (University of Waterloo)

  • Pengfei Li

    (University of Waterloo)

Abstract

The asymptotic behaviour of the commonly used bootstrap percentile confidence interval is investigated when the parameters are subject to linear inequality constraints. We concentrate on the important one- and two-sample problems with data generated from general distributions in the natural exponential family. The focus of this note is on quantifying the coverage probabilities of the parametric bootstrap percentile confidence intervals, in particular their limiting behaviour near boundaries. We propose using a local asymptotic framework to study this subtle coverage behaviour. Under this framework, we discover that when the true parameters are on, or close to, the restriction boundary, the asymptotic coverage probabilities can always exceed the nominal level in the one-sample case; however, they can be, remarkably, both under and over the nominal level in the two-sample case. Using illustrative examples, we show that the results provide theoretical justification and guidance on applying the bootstrap percentile method to constrained inference problems.

Suggested Citation

  • Chunlin Wang & Paul Marriott & Pengfei Li, 2022. "A note on the coverage behaviour of bootstrap percentile confidence intervals for constrained parameters," Metrika: International Journal for Theoretical and Applied Statistics, Springer, vol. 85(7), pages 809-831, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:metrik:v:85:y:2022:i:7:d:10.1007_s00184-021-00851-0
    DOI: 10.1007/s00184-021-00851-0
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s00184-021-00851-0
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s00184-021-00851-0?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Andrews, Donald W.K. & Guggenberger, Patrik, 2009. "Validity Of Subsampling And “Plug-In Asymptotic” Inference For Parameters Defined By Moment Inequalities," Econometric Theory, Cambridge University Press, vol. 25(3), pages 669-709, June.
    2. Li, Zhiguo & Taylor, Jeremy M. G. & Nan, Bin, 2010. "Construction of Confidence Intervals and Regions for Ordered Binomial Probabilities," The American Statistician, American Statistical Association, vol. 64(4), pages 291-298.
    3. Andrews, Donald W K, 2001. "Testing When a Parameter Is on the Boundary of the Maintained Hypothesis," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 69(3), pages 683-734, May.
    4. Mathias Drton & Benjamin Williams, 2011. "Quantifying the failure of bootstrap likelihood ratio tests," Biometrika, Biometrika Trust, vol. 98(4), pages 919-934.
    5. Donald W. K. Andrews, 2000. "Inconsistency of the Bootstrap when a Parameter Is on the Boundary of the Parameter Space," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 68(2), pages 399-406, March.
    6. Molenberghs, Geert & Verbeke, Geert, 2007. "Likelihood Ratio, Score, and Wald Tests in a Constrained Parameter Space," The American Statistician, American Statistical Association, vol. 61, pages 22-27, February.
    7. Andrews, Donald W.K. & Guggenberger, Patrik, 2010. "ASYMPTOTIC SIZE AND A PROBLEM WITH SUBSAMPLING AND WITH THE m OUT OF n BOOTSTRAP," Econometric Theory, Cambridge University Press, vol. 26(2), pages 426-468, April.
    8. Donald W.K. Andrews, 1997. "A Simple Counterexample to the Bootstrap," Cowles Foundation Discussion Papers 1157, Cowles Foundation for Research in Economics, Yale University.
    9. Guang Cheng, 2015. "Moment Consistency of the Exchangeably Weighted Bootstrap for Semiparametric M-estimation," Scandinavian Journal of Statistics, Danish Society for Theoretical Statistics;Finnish Statistical Society;Norwegian Statistical Association;Swedish Statistical Association, vol. 42(3), pages 665-684, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Centorrino, Samuele & Pérez-Urdiales, María, 2023. "Maximum likelihood estimation of stochastic frontier models with endogeneity," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 234(1), pages 82-105.
    2. Ketz, Philipp, 2018. "Subvector inference when the true parameter vector may be near or at the boundary," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 207(2), pages 285-306.
    3. Andrews, Donald W.K. & Cheng, Xu & Guggenberger, Patrik, 2020. "Generic results for establishing the asymptotic size of confidence sets and tests," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 218(2), pages 496-531.
    4. McCloskey, Adam, 2017. "Bonferroni-based size-correction for nonstandard testing problems," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 200(1), pages 17-35.
    5. Joseph P. Romano & Azeem M. Shaikh & Michael Wolf, 2014. "A Practical Two‐Step Method for Testing Moment Inequalities," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 82(5), pages 1979-2002, September.
    6. Chen, Ruxin & Tabri, Rami V., 2019. "Jackknife Empirical Likelihood for Inequality Constraints on Regular Functionals," Working Papers 2019-07, University of Sydney, School of Economics, revised Sep 2019.
    7. Lok, Thomas M. & Tabri, Rami V., 2021. "An improved bootstrap test for restricted stochastic dominance," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 224(2), pages 371-393.
    8. Konrad Menzel, 2021. "Bootstrap With Cluster‐Dependence in Two or More Dimensions," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 89(5), pages 2143-2188, September.
    9. Khalaf, Lynda & Saphores, Jean-Daniel & Bilodeau, Jean-Francois, 2003. "Simulation-based exact jump tests in models with conditional heteroskedasticity," Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, Elsevier, vol. 28(3), pages 531-553, December.
    10. Ekaterina Oparina & Sorawoot Srisuma, 2022. "Analyzing Subjective Well-Being Data with Misclassification," Journal of Business & Economic Statistics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 40(2), pages 730-743, April.
    11. Andrews, Donald W.K. & Guggenberger, Patrik, 2009. "Incorrect asymptotic size of subsampling procedures based on post-consistent model selection estimators," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 152(1), pages 19-27, September.
    12. Andrews, Donald W.K. & Guggenberger, Patrik, 2010. "Applications of subsampling, hybrid, and size-correction methods," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 158(2), pages 285-305, October.
    13. Giuseppe Cavaliere & Heino Bohn Nielsen & Anders Rahbek, 2017. "On the Consistency of Bootstrap Testing for a Parameter on the Boundary of the Parameter Space," Journal of Time Series Analysis, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 38(4), pages 513-534, July.
    14. Cavaliere, Giuseppe & Nielsen, Heino Bohn & Pedersen, Rasmus Søndergaard & Rahbek, Anders, 2022. "Bootstrap inference on the boundary of the parameter space, with application to conditional volatility models," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 227(1), pages 241-263.
    15. Joseph P. Romano & Azeem M. Shaikh & Michael Wolf, 2010. "Hypothesis Testing in Econometrics," Annual Review of Economics, Annual Reviews, vol. 2(1), pages 75-104, September.
    16. Javier Mencía & Enrique Sentana, 2012. "Distributional Tests in Multivariate Dynamic Models with Normal and Student-t Innovations," The Review of Economics and Statistics, MIT Press, vol. 94(1), pages 133-152, February.
    17. Rosen, Adam M., 2008. "Confidence sets for partially identified parameters that satisfy a finite number of moment inequalities," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 146(1), pages 107-117, September.
    18. Thomas Demuynck, 2018. "Testing the homogeneous marginal utility of income assumption," Econometric Reviews, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 37(10), pages 1120-1136, November.
    19. Camponovo, Lorenzo & Scaillet, Olivier & Trojani, Fabio, 2012. "Robust subsampling," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 167(1), pages 197-210.
    20. Donald W.K. Andrews & Patrik Guggenberger, 2007. "The Limit of Finite-Sample Size and a Problem with Subsampling," Cowles Foundation Discussion Papers 1605, Cowles Foundation for Research in Economics, Yale University.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:metrik:v:85:y:2022:i:7:d:10.1007_s00184-021-00851-0. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.