IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/metcap/v19y2017i2d10.1007_s11009-016-9520-9.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Log-Convexity of Counting Processes Evaluated at a Random end of Observation Time with Applications to Queueing Models

Author

Listed:
  • F. G. Badía

    (University of Zaragoza)

  • C. Sangüesa

    (University of Zaragoza)

Abstract

We consider a counting processes with independent inter-arrival times evaluated at a random end of observation time T, independent of the process. For instance, this situation can arise in a queueing model when we evaluate the number of arrivals after a random period which can depend on the process of service times. Provided that T has log-convex density, we give conditions for the inter-arrival times in the counting process so that the observed number of arrivals inherits this property. For exponential inter-arrival times (pure-birth processes) we provide necessary and sufficient conditions. As an application, we give conditions such that the stationary number of customers waiting in a queue is a log-convex random variable. We also study bounds in the approximation of log-convex discrete random variables by a geometric distribution.

Suggested Citation

  • F. G. Badía & C. Sangüesa, 2017. "Log-Convexity of Counting Processes Evaluated at a Random end of Observation Time with Applications to Queueing Models," Methodology and Computing in Applied Probability, Springer, vol. 19(2), pages 647-664, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:metcap:v:19:y:2017:i:2:d:10.1007_s11009-016-9520-9
    DOI: 10.1007/s11009-016-9520-9
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11009-016-9520-9
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s11009-016-9520-9?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Rodríguez-Dagnino, Ramón M. & Takagi, Hideaki, 2010. "Application of renewal theory to call handover counting and dynamic location management in cellular mobile networks," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 204(1), pages 1-13, July.
    2. Asmussen, Søren & Klüppelberg, Claudia & Sigman, Karl, 1999. "Sampling at subexponential times, with queueing applications," Stochastic Processes and their Applications, Elsevier, vol. 79(2), pages 265-286, February.
    3. Ruiguang Song & John M. Karon & Edward White & Gary Goldbaum, 2006. "Estimating the Distribution of a Renewal Process from Times at which Events from an Independent Process Are Detected," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 62(3), pages 838-846, September.
    4. Maxim Finkelstein & Ji Hwan Cha, 2013. "Stochastic Modeling for Reliability," Springer Series in Reliability Engineering, Springer, edition 127, number 978-1-4471-5028-2, June.
    5. Dickson, D. C. M., 2001. "Lundberg Approximations for Compound Distributions with Insurance Applications. By G. E. Willmot and X. S. Lin. (Springer, 2000)," British Actuarial Journal, Cambridge University Press, vol. 7(4), pages 690-691, October.
    6. Mohsen Alipour & Luisa Beghin & Davood Rostamy, 2015. "Generalized Fractional Nonlinear Birth Processes," Methodology and Computing in Applied Probability, Springer, vol. 17(3), pages 525-540, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Franck Adékambi & Essodina Takouda, 2020. "Gerber–Shiu Function in a Class of Delayed and Perturbed Risk Model with Dependence," Risks, MDPI, vol. 8(1), pages 1-25, March.
    2. Søren Asmussen & Pierre Fiorini & Lester Lipsky & Tomasz Rolski & Robert Sheahan, 2008. "Asymptotic Behavior of Total Times for Jobs That Must Start Over if a Failure Occurs," Mathematics of Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 33(4), pages 932-944, November.
    3. Sanguesa, C., 2006. "Approximations of ruin probabilities in mixed Poisson models with lattice claim amounts," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 39(1), pages 69-80, August.
    4. Psarrakos, Georgios & Politis, Konstadinos, 2008. "Tail bounds for the joint distribution of the surplus prior to and at ruin," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 42(1), pages 163-176, February.
    5. Safaei, Fatemeh & Taghipour, Sharareh, 2024. "Integrated degradation-based burn-in and maintenance model for heterogeneous and highly reliable items," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 244(C).
    6. Cai, Jun & Dickson, David C.M., 2004. "Ruin probabilities with a Markov chain interest model," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 35(3), pages 513-525, December.
    7. Bin Liu & Jie Min & Yiqiang Q. Zhao, 2023. "Refined tail asymptotic properties for the $$M^X/G/1$$ M X / G / 1 retrial queue," Queueing Systems: Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 104(1), pages 65-105, June.
    8. Baltrunas, A. & Daley, D. J. & Klüppelberg, C., 2004. "Tail behaviour of the busy period of a GI/GI/1 queue with subexponential service times," Stochastic Processes and their Applications, Elsevier, vol. 111(2), pages 237-258, June.
    9. Lee, Wing Yan & Willmot, Gordon E., 2014. "On the moments of the time to ruin in dependent Sparre Andersen models with emphasis on Coxian interclaim times," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 59(C), pages 1-10.
    10. John D. Rice & Robert L. Strawderman & Brent A. Johnson, 2018. "Regularity of a renewal process estimated from binary data," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 74(2), pages 566-574, June.
    11. Psarrakos, Georgios, 2010. "On the DFR property of the compound geometric distribution with applications in risk theory," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 47(3), pages 428-433, December.
    12. Wang, Rongming & Yang, Hailiang & Wang, Hanxing, 2004. "On the distribution of surplus immediately after ruin under interest force and subexponential claims," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 35(3), pages 703-714, December.
    13. El Attar Abderrahim & El Hachloufi Mostafa & Guennoun Zine El Abidine, 2017. "An Inclusive Criterion For An Optimal Choice Of Reinsurance," Annals of Financial Economics (AFE), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 12(04), pages 1-22, December.
    14. Baumgartner, Carolin & Gruber, Lutz F. & Czado, Claudia, 2015. "Bayesian total loss estimation using shared random effects," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 62(C), pages 194-201.
    15. Chadjiconstantinidis, Stathis & Politis, Konstadinos, 2007. "Two-sided bounds for the distribution of the deficit at ruin in the renewal risk model," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 41(1), pages 41-52, July.
    16. Diasparra, Maikol & Romera, Rosario, 2009. "Inequalities for the ruin probability in a controlled discrete-time risk process," DES - Working Papers. Statistics and Econometrics. WS ws093513, Universidad Carlos III de Madrid. Departamento de Estadística.
    17. Kim, So-Yeun & Willmot, Gordon E., 2016. "On the analysis of ruin-related quantities in the delayed renewal risk model," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 66(C), pages 77-85.
    18. Wei, Xiao & Hu, Yijun, 2008. "Ruin probabilities for discrete time risk models with stochastic rates of interest," Statistics & Probability Letters, Elsevier, vol. 78(6), pages 707-715, April.
    19. Franco Pellerey & Cristina Zucca, 2005. "Stochastic Bounds for the Sparre Andersen Process," Methodology and Computing in Applied Probability, Springer, vol. 7(2), pages 225-247, June.
    20. Debicki, Krzystof & Zwart, Bert & Borst, Sem, 2004. "The supremum of a Gaussian process over a random interval," Statistics & Probability Letters, Elsevier, vol. 68(3), pages 221-234, July.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:metcap:v:19:y:2017:i:2:d:10.1007_s11009-016-9520-9. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.