IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/mathme/v90y2019i2d10.1007_s00186-019-00672-y.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Facets of the cone of totally balanced games

Author

Listed:
  • Tomáš Kroupa

    (Institute of Information Theory and Automation)

  • Milan Studený

    (Institute of Information Theory and Automation)

Abstract

The class of totally balanced games is a class of transferable-utility coalitional games providing important models of cooperative behavior used in mathematical economics. They coincide with market games of Shapley and Shubik and every totally balanced game is also representable as the minimum of a finite set of additive games. In this paper we characterize the polyhedral cone of totally balanced games by describing its facets. Our main result is that there is a correspondence between facet-defining inequalities for the cone and the class of special balanced systems of coalitions, the so-called irreducible min-balanced systems. Our method is based on refining the notion of balancedness introduced by Shapley. We also formulate a conjecture about what are the facets of the cone of exact games, which addresses an open problem appearing in the literature.

Suggested Citation

  • Tomáš Kroupa & Milan Studený, 2019. "Facets of the cone of totally balanced games," Mathematical Methods of Operations Research, Springer;Gesellschaft für Operations Research (GOR);Nederlands Genootschap voor Besliskunde (NGB), vol. 90(2), pages 271-300, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:mathme:v:90:y:2019:i:2:d:10.1007_s00186-019-00672-y
    DOI: 10.1007/s00186-019-00672-y
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s00186-019-00672-y
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s00186-019-00672-y?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Oishi, Takayuki & Nakayama, Mikio & Hokari, Toru & Funaki, Yukihiko, 2016. "Duality and anti-duality in TU games applied to solutions, axioms, and axiomatizations," Journal of Mathematical Economics, Elsevier, vol. 63(C), pages 44-53.
    2. Ehud Kalai & Eitan Zemel, 1982. "Totally Balanced Games and Games of Flow," Mathematics of Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 7(3), pages 476-478, August.
    3. Csóka, Péter & Herings, P. Jean-Jacques & Kóczy, László Á., 2009. "Stable allocations of risk," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 67(1), pages 266-276, September.
    4. Lohmann, E. & Borm, P. & Herings, P.J.J., 2012. "Minimal exact balancedness," Mathematical Social Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 64(2), pages 127-135.
    5. Lloyd S. Shapley, 1967. "On balanced sets and cores," Naval Research Logistics Quarterly, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 14(4), pages 453-460.
    6. Shapley, Lloyd S. & Shubik, Martin, 1969. "On market games," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 1(1), pages 9-25, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Milan Studený & Václav Kratochvíl, 2022. "Facets of the cone of exact games," Mathematical Methods of Operations Research, Springer;Gesellschaft für Operations Research (GOR);Nederlands Genootschap voor Besliskunde (NGB), vol. 95(1), pages 35-80, February.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Milan Studený & Václav Kratochvíl, 2022. "Facets of the cone of exact games," Mathematical Methods of Operations Research, Springer;Gesellschaft für Operations Research (GOR);Nederlands Genootschap voor Besliskunde (NGB), vol. 95(1), pages 35-80, February.
    2. Csóka Péter & Pintér Miklós, 2016. "On the Impossibility of Fair Risk Allocation," The B.E. Journal of Theoretical Economics, De Gruyter, vol. 16(1), pages 143-158, January.
    3. Streekstra, Leanne & Trudeau, Christian, 2020. "Stable source connection and assignment problems as multi-period shortest path problems," Discussion Papers on Economics 7/2020, University of Southern Denmark, Department of Economics.
    4. Borrero, D.V. & Hinojosa, M.A. & Mármol, A.M., 2016. "DEA production games and Owen allocations," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 252(3), pages 921-930.
    5. Fatma Aslan & Papatya Duman & Walter Trockel, 2019. "Duality for General TU-games Redefined," Working Papers CIE 121, Paderborn University, CIE Center for International Economics.
    6. Stefano Moretti & Henk Norde, 2021. "A note on weighted multi-glove games," Social Choice and Welfare, Springer;The Society for Social Choice and Welfare, vol. 57(4), pages 721-732, November.
    7. Csóka, Péter & Herings, P. Jean-Jacques & Kóczy, László Á., 2009. "Stable allocations of risk," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 67(1), pages 266-276, September.
    8. Fatma Aslan & Papatya Duman & Walter Trockel, 2020. "Non-cohesive TU-games: Duality and P-core," Working Papers CIE 136, Paderborn University, CIE Center for International Economics.
    9. Judith Timmer & Werner Scheinhardt, 2018. "Customer and Cost Sharing in a Jackson Network," International Game Theory Review (IGTR), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 20(03), pages 1-10, September.
    10. Sun, Ning & Trockel, Walter & Yang, Zaifu, 2008. "Competitive outcomes and endogenous coalition formation in an n-person game," Journal of Mathematical Economics, Elsevier, vol. 44(7-8), pages 853-860, July.
    11. Lohmann, E. & Borm, P. & Herings, P.J.J., 2012. "Minimal exact balancedness," Mathematical Social Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 64(2), pages 127-135.
    12. Algaba, Encarnación & Béal, Sylvain & Fragnelli, Vito & Llorca, Natividad & Sánchez-Soriano, Joaquin, 2019. "Relationship between labeled network games and other cooperative games arising from attributes situations," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 185(C).
    13. Dylan Laplace Mermoud, 2023. "Geometry of Set Functions in Game Theory: Combinatorial and Computational Aspects," Papers 2301.02950, arXiv.org, revised Oct 2023.
    14. Luis A. Guardiola & Ana Meca & Justo Puerto, 2022. "The effect of consolidated periods in heterogeneous lot-sizing games," TOP: An Official Journal of the Spanish Society of Statistics and Operations Research, Springer;Sociedad de Estadística e Investigación Operativa, vol. 30(2), pages 380-404, July.
    15. Luis A. Guardiola & Ana Meca & Justo Puerto, 2021. "Unitary Owen Points in Cooperative Lot-Sizing Models with Backlogging," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 9(8), pages 1-19, April.
    16. Gabriele Canna & Francesca Centrone & Emanuela Rosazza Gianin, 2021. "Capital Allocation Rules and the No-Undercut Property," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 9(2), pages 1-13, January.
    17. Yang, Jian & Li, Jianbin, 2020. "Cooperative game with nondeterministic returns," Journal of Mathematical Economics, Elsevier, vol. 88(C), pages 123-140.
    18. Kovalenkov, Alexander & Wooders, Myrna, 2003. "Approximate cores of games and economies with clubs," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 110(1), pages 87-120, May.
    19. Garratt, Rod & Qin, Cheng-Zhong, 1997. "On a Market for Coalitions with Indivisible Agents and Lotteries," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 77(1), pages 81-101, November.
    20. Zaremba Leszek & Zaremba Cezary S. & Suchenek Marek, 2017. "Modification of Shapley Value and its Implementation in Decision Making," Foundations of Management, Sciendo, vol. 9(1), pages 257-272, October.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:mathme:v:90:y:2019:i:2:d:10.1007_s00186-019-00672-y. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.