Portfolio optimization under transaction costs in the CRR model
Author
Abstract
Suggested Citation
DOI: 10.1007/s00186-005-0415-8
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.
Citations
Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
Cited by:
- Colin Atkinson & Emmeline Storey, 2010. "Building an Optimal Portfolio in Discrete Time in the Presence of Transaction Costs," Applied Mathematical Finance, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 17(4), pages 323-357.
- Christian Bayer & Bezirgen Veliyev, 2014.
"Utility Maximization In A Binomial Model With Transaction Costs: A Duality Approach Based On The Shadow Price Process,"
International Journal of Theoretical and Applied Finance (IJTAF), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 17(04), pages 1-27.
- Christian Bayer & Bezirgen Veliyev, 2012. "Utility Maximization in a Binomial Model with transaction costs: a Duality Approach Based on the Shadow Price Process," Papers 1209.5175, arXiv.org.
- Jörn Sass & Manfred Schäl, 2014. "Numeraire portfolios and utility-based price systems under proportional transaction costs," Decisions in Economics and Finance, Springer;Associazione per la Matematica, vol. 37(2), pages 195-234, October.
- Romain Blanchard & Laurence Carassus & Miklós Rásonyi, 2018. "No-arbitrage and optimal investment with possibly non-concave utilities: a measure theoretical approach," Mathematical Methods of Operations Research, Springer;Gesellschaft für Operations Research (GOR);Nederlands Genootschap voor Besliskunde (NGB), vol. 88(2), pages 241-281, October.
- Alet Roux, 2007. "The fundamental theorem of asset pricing under proportional transaction costs," Papers 0710.2758, arXiv.org.
- Romain Blanchard & Laurence Carassus & Miklos Rasonyi, 2018. "Optimal investment with possibly non-concave utilities and no-arbitrage: a measure theoretical approach," Post-Print hal-01883419, HAL.
More about this item
Keywords
Portfolio optimization; Transaction costs; CRR model; Utility maximization; Markov control processes;All these keywords.
Statistics
Access and download statisticsCorrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:mathme:v:61:y:2005:i:2:p:239-259. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.