IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/masfgc/v30y2025i1d10.1007_s11027-024-10191-9.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Trees Without Borders: the next challenge in climate change adaptation

Author

Listed:
  • Gregory A. O’Neill

    (British Columbia Ministry of Forests, Kalamalka Forestry Centre)

  • Harry Nelson

    (The University of British Columbia)

  • Arial Eatherton

    (The University of British Columbia)

Abstract

As the climate continues to change, forestry jurisdictions that have implemented assisted migration are looking to ever-warmer locations to find tree seed sources that are climatically adapted to their reforestation sites. This may result in having to procure seed from neighbouring jurisdictions, with whom seed and seed transfer systems are not typically shared. Using recent literature on institutional response to climate change and taking British Columbia’s need for seed from the US Pacific Northwest (PNW) as a case study, we survey stakeholders to examine barriers to interjurisdictional seed movement, and address more broadly the ability of institutions to respond to climate change. We detected no significant institutional or informational barriers to increased seed procurement from the PNW. Nonetheless, risk and change aversion associated with new tools, actors, and practices may constrain implementation efforts. Reduced jurisdictional isolation could create significant opportunities and efficiencies in the seed supply chain and could help locate the best adapted species or seed source for each plantation. Our findings suggest climate change adaptation across multiple actors and geographies is possible. Placing more emphasis on the human elements of the system - the actors, their interests, and incentives - may help improve our capacity to deliver effective climate change adaptation actions.

Suggested Citation

  • Gregory A. O’Neill & Harry Nelson & Arial Eatherton, 2025. "Trees Without Borders: the next challenge in climate change adaptation," Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, Springer, vol. 30(1), pages 1-22, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:masfgc:v:30:y:2025:i:1:d:10.1007_s11027-024-10191-9
    DOI: 10.1007/s11027-024-10191-9
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11027-024-10191-9
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s11027-024-10191-9?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. James D. Ford & Tristan Pearce & Graham McDowell & Lea Berrang-Ford & Jesse S. Sayles & Ella Belfer, 2018. "Vulnerability and its discontents: the past, present, and future of climate change vulnerability research," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 151(2), pages 189-203, November.
    2. Thomas J. Timberlake & Courtney A. Schultz, 2017. "Policy, practice, and partnerships for climate change adaptation on US national forests," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 144(2), pages 257-269, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Camila Flórez Bossio & James Ford & Danielle Labbé, 2019. "Adaptive capacity in urban areas of developing countries," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 157(2), pages 279-297, November.
    2. Chelsea Batavia & Michael Paul Nelson, 2018. "Translating climate change policy into forest management practice in a multiple-use context: the role of ethics," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 148(1), pages 81-94, May.
    3. Shepherd, Philippa M. & Dissart, Jean-Christophe, 2022. "Reframing vulnerability and resilience to climate change through the lens of capability generation," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 201(C).
    4. Hanson, Helena I. & Wickenberg, Björn & Alkan Olsson, Johanna, 2020. "Working on the boundaries—How do science use and interpret the nature-based solution concept?," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 90(C).
    5. Tudose, Nicu Constantin & Cheval, Sorin & Ungurean, Cezar & Broekman, Annelies & Sanchez-Plaza, Anabel & Cremades, Roger & Mitter, Hermine & Kropf, Bernadette & Davidescu, Serban Octavian & Dinca, Luc, 2022. "Climate services for sustainable resource management: The water—energy—land nexus in the Tărlung river basin (Romania)," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 119(C).
    6. Shadreck Muchaku & Grey Magaiza & Hamisai Hamandawana, 2023. "Translating Indigenous Knowledge into Actionable Climate-Change Adaption Strategies: A Case Study of Maluti-a-Phofung Local Municipality, Free State Province, South Africa," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(2), pages 1-11, January.
    7. Attila Buzási & Tamás Pálvölgyi & Diána Esses, 2021. "Drought-related vulnerability and its policy implications in Hungary," Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, Springer, vol. 26(3), pages 1-20, March.
    8. Nimra Iqbal & Marvin Ravan & Ali Jamshed & Joern Birkmann & Giorgos Somarakis & Zina Mitraka & Nektarios Chrysoulakis, 2022. "Linkages between Typologies of Existing Urban Development Patterns and Human Vulnerability to Heat Stress in Lahore," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(17), pages 1-26, August.
    9. Ivan Villaverde Canosa & James Ford & Jouni Paavola & Daria Burnasheva, 2024. "Community Risk and Resilience to Wildfires: Rethinking the Complex Human–Climate–Fire Relationship in High-Latitude Regions," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(3), pages 1-22, January.
    10. Nikinmaa, Laura & de Koning, Johannes H.C. & Derks, Jakob & Grabska-Szwagrzyk, Ewa & Konczal, Agata A. & Lindner, Marcus & Socha, Jarosław & Muys, Bart, 2024. "The priorities in managing forest disturbances to enhance forest resilience: A comparison of a literature analysis and perceptions of forest professionals," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 158(C).
    11. Jiang Lanlan & Md Nazirul Islam Sarker & Isahaque Ali & R. B. Radin Firdaus & Md Altab Hossin, 2024. "Vulnerability and resilience in the context of natural hazards: a critical conceptual analysis," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 26(8), pages 19069-19092, August.
    12. Jena, Pradyot Ranjan & Khosla, Sunil & Rahut, Dil Bahadur, 2024. "Can farmers with higher capabilities fend off falling into future Poverty? Empirical evidence from a tribal region in eastern India," World Development Perspectives, Elsevier, vol. 33(C).
    13. Cory L. Struthers & Kathryn J. Murenbeeld & Matthew A. Williamson, 2023. "Environmental impact assessments not the main barrier to timely forest management in the United States," Nature Sustainability, Nature, vol. 6(12), pages 1542-1546, December.
    14. Jonathan W. Long & E. Ashley Steel, 2020. "Shifting Perspectives in Assessing Socio-Environmental Vulnerability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(7), pages 1-20, March.
    15. Feng Chen & Hadad Martín & Xiaoen Zhao & Fidel Roig & Heli Zhang & Shijie Wang & Weipeng Yue & Youping Chen, 2022. "Abnormally low precipitation-induced ecological imbalance contributed to the fall of the Ming Dynasty: new evidence from tree rings," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 173(1), pages 1-16, July.
    16. Armand Landreau & Sirkku Juhola & Alexandra Jurgilevich & Aleksi Räsänen, 2021. "Combining socio-economic and climate projections to assess heat risk," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 167(1), pages 1-20, July.
    17. Matthias Garschagen & Deepal Doshi & Jonathan Reith & Michael Hagenlocher, 2021. "Global patterns of disaster and climate risk—an analysis of the consistency of leading index-based assessments and their results," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 169(1), pages 1-19, November.
    18. Natasha Haruka Collins & Courtney A. Schultz, 2021. "Why companies fund climate change projects on national forests: insights into the motivations of the Forest Service’s corporate partners," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 169(3), pages 1-26, December.
    19. Trung Thanh, Hoang & Tschakert, Petra & Hipsey, Matthew R., 2021. "Moving up or going under? Differential livelihood trajectories in coastal communities in Vietnam," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 138(C).
    20. Oudah Yobom, 2020. "Climate change and variability: empirical evidence for countries and agroecological zones of the Sahel," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 159(3), pages 365-384, April.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:masfgc:v:30:y:2025:i:1:d:10.1007_s11027-024-10191-9. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.