IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/nat/natsus/v6y2023i12d10.1038_s41893-023-01218-1.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Environmental impact assessments not the main barrier to timely forest management in the United States

Author

Listed:
  • Cory L. Struthers

    (University of Georgia)

  • Kathryn J. Murenbeeld

    (Boise State University)

  • Matthew A. Williamson

    (Boise State University)

Abstract

Environmental impact assessment (EIA) processes are commonly used by government agencies to evaluate the merits and environmental risks of natural resource management decisions. Citing EIA as red tape, decision makers from across the political spectrum are increasingly circumventing EIA to expedite implementation of necessary actions for climate resilience and clean energy. Few studies have quantified the extent that EIA is the main barrier to efficient implementation. We combine administrative data from the US Forest Service with survival analysis to show that, for most actions, the Forest Service takes as long or longer to award first contracts and roll out initial activities than to comply with the 1970 National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA), and that NEPA compliance accounts for approximately one-fifth of planned implementation time.

Suggested Citation

  • Cory L. Struthers & Kathryn J. Murenbeeld & Matthew A. Williamson, 2023. "Environmental impact assessments not the main barrier to timely forest management in the United States," Nature Sustainability, Nature, vol. 6(12), pages 1542-1546, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:nat:natsus:v:6:y:2023:i:12:d:10.1038_s41893-023-01218-1
    DOI: 10.1038/s41893-023-01218-1
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.nature.com/articles/s41893-023-01218-1
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1038/s41893-023-01218-1?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Steven J. Balla & Alexander R. Beck & Elizabeth Meehan & Aryamala Prasad, 2022. "Lost in the flood?: Agency responsiveness to mass comment campaigns in administrative rulemaking," Regulation & Governance, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 16(1), pages 293-308, January.
    2. Thomas J. Timberlake & Courtney A. Schultz, 2017. "Policy, practice, and partnerships for climate change adaptation on US national forests," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 144(2), pages 257-269, September.
    3. Portman, Michelle E., 2014. "Regulatory capture by default: Offshore exploratory drilling for oil and gas," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 65(C), pages 37-47.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Fry, Matthew & Brannstrom, Christian, 2017. "Emergent patterns and processes in urban hydrocarbon governance," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 111(C), pages 383-393.
    2. Chelsea Batavia & Michael Paul Nelson, 2018. "Translating climate change policy into forest management practice in a multiple-use context: the role of ethics," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 148(1), pages 81-94, May.
    3. Alena V. Pivavarava & Christel Koop, 2023. "The adoption of digital practices by economic regulators: mapping digital pathways for consumer e-participation," Economics Series Working Papers 1013, University of Oxford, Department of Economics.
    4. Hanson, Helena I. & Wickenberg, Björn & Alkan Olsson, Johanna, 2020. "Working on the boundaries—How do science use and interpret the nature-based solution concept?," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 90(C).
    5. Fischhendler, Itay & Nathan, Daniel, 2014. "In the name of energy security: the struggle over the exportation of Israeli natural gas," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 70(C), pages 152-162.
    6. Nikinmaa, Laura & de Koning, Johannes H.C. & Derks, Jakob & Grabska-Szwagrzyk, Ewa & Konczal, Agata A. & Lindner, Marcus & Socha, Jarosław & Muys, Bart, 2024. "The priorities in managing forest disturbances to enhance forest resilience: A comparison of a literature analysis and perceptions of forest professionals," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 158(C).
    7. Jonathan W. Long & E. Ashley Steel, 2020. "Shifting Perspectives in Assessing Socio-Environmental Vulnerability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(7), pages 1-20, March.
    8. Peter Bils & Robert J. Carroll & Lawrence S. Rothenberg, 2024. "Strategic avoidance and rulemaking procedures," Journal of Theoretical Politics, , vol. 36(2), pages 156-185, April.
    9. Portman, M.E., 2015. "Marine spatial planning in the Middle East: Crossing the policy-planning divide," Marine Policy, Elsevier, vol. 61(C), pages 8-15.
    10. Natasha Haruka Collins & Courtney A. Schultz, 2021. "Why companies fund climate change projects on national forests: insights into the motivations of the Forest Service’s corporate partners," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 169(3), pages 1-26, December.
    11. Eriksson, Louise & Sandström, Camilla, 2022. "Is voluntarism an effective and legitimate way of governing climate adaptation? A study of private forest owners in Sweden," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 140(C).
    12. Yu Tu & Benhong Peng & Ehsan Elahi & Weiku Wu, 2020. "Initiator or Intermediary? A Case Study on Network Relation of Environmental Regulatory Capture in China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(24), pages 1-19, December.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nat:natsus:v:6:y:2023:i:12:d:10.1038_s41893-023-01218-1. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.nature.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.