IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/masfgc/v28y2023i3d10.1007_s11027-023-10046-9.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Effect of rewetting degraded peatlands on carbon fluxes: a meta-analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Taryono Darusman

    (IPB University Darmaga Campus
    Katingan – Mentaya Project, PT. Rimba Makmur Utama)

  • Daniel Murdiyarso

    (IPB University Darmaga Campus
    Jl. CIFOR)

  • Impron

    (IPB University Darmaga Campus)

  • Iswandi Anas

    (IPB University Darmaga Campus)

Abstract

Numerous studies claim that rewetting interventions reduce CO2 and increase CH4 fluxes. To verify the claim, we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of the effects of rewetting on CO2 and CH4 fluxes and dissolved organic carbon (DOC). We identified 28 primary articles eligible for meta-analysis, from which we calculated 48 effect sizes for CO2 emissions, 67 effect sizes for CH4 emissions, and 5 effect sizes for DOC. We found that rewetting significantly decreased CO2 fluxes, with temperate zones showing the highest Hedges’ g effect size (−0.798 ± 0.229), followed by tropical (−0.338 ± 0.269) and boreal (−0.209 ± 0.372) zones. Meanwhile, rewetting increased CH4 fluxes, with the highest Hedges’ g effect size shown in temperate zones (1.108 ± 0.144), followed by boreal (0.805 ± 0.183) and tropical (0.096 ± 0.284) zones. In addition, based on yearly monitoring after rewetting, the CH4 emissions effect size increased significantly over the first 4 years (r2 = 0.853). Overall, the rewetting intervention reduced CO2 emissions by −1.43 ± 0.35 Mg CO2–C ha−1 year−1, increased CH4 emissions by 0.033 ± 0.003 Mg CH4–C ha−1 year−1, and had no significant impact on DOC. To improve the precision and reduce the bias of rewetting effect size quantification, it is recommended to conduct more experimental studies with extended monitoring periods using larger sample sizes and apply the before-after control-impact study design, especially in boreal and tropical climate zones.

Suggested Citation

  • Taryono Darusman & Daniel Murdiyarso & Impron & Iswandi Anas, 2023. "Effect of rewetting degraded peatlands on carbon fluxes: a meta-analysis," Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, Springer, vol. 28(3), pages 1-20, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:masfgc:v:28:y:2023:i:3:d:10.1007_s11027-023-10046-9
    DOI: 10.1007/s11027-023-10046-9
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11027-023-10046-9
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s11027-023-10046-9?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Lijuan Cui & Xiaoming Kang & Wei Li & Yanbin Hao & Yuan Zhang & Jinzhi Wang & Liang Yan & Xiaodong Zhang & Manyin Zhang & Jian Zhou & Paul Kardol, 2017. "Rewetting Decreases Carbon Emissions from the Zoige Alpine Peatland on the Tibetan Plateau," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(6), pages 1-13, June.
    2. Jens Leifeld & Chloé Wüst-Galley & Susan Page, 2019. "Intact and managed peatland soils as a source and sink of GHGs from 1850 to 2100," Nature Climate Change, Nature, vol. 9(12), pages 945-947, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. McNicol, Louise C. & Williams, Non G. & Chadwick, Dave & Styles, David & Rees, Robert M. & Ramsey, Rachael & Williams, A. Prysor, 2024. "Net Zero requires ambitious greenhouse gas emission reductions on beef and sheep farms coordinated with afforestation and other land use change measures," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 215(C).
    2. Gren, Ing-Marie, 2024. "A trading market for uncertain carbon removal by land use in the EU," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 159(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Andrey Sirin & Maria Medvedeva & Vladimir Korotkov & Victor Itkin & Tatiana Minayeva & Danil Ilyasov & Gennady Suvorov & Hans Joosten, 2021. "Addressing Peatland Rewetting in Russian Federation Climate Reporting," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(11), pages 1-17, November.
    2. Willenbockel, Dirk, 2024. "Peatland restoration in Germany: A dynamic general equilibrium analysis," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 220(C).
    3. Mārtiņš Vanags-Duka & Arta Bārdule & Aldis Butlers & Emīls Mārtiņš Upenieks & Andis Lazdiņš & Dana Purviņa & Ieva Līcīte, 2022. "GHG Emissions from Drainage Ditches in Peat Extraction Sites and Peatland Forests in Hemiboreal Latvia," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(12), pages 1-17, December.
    4. Rong Leng & Quanzhi Yuan & Yushuang Wang & Qian Kuang & Ping Ren, 2020. "Carbon Balance of Grasslands on the Qinghai-Tibet Plateau under Future Climate Change: A Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(2), pages 1-21, January.
    5. Xiaoming Kang & Liang Yan & Lijuan Cui & Xiaodong Zhang & Yanbin Hao & Haidong Wu & Yuan Zhang & Wei Li & Kerou Zhang & Zhongqing Yan & Yong Li & Jinzhi Wang, 2018. "Reduced Carbon Dioxide Sink and Methane Source under Extreme Drought Condition in an Alpine Peatland," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(11), pages 1-15, November.
    6. Edward B. Barbier, 2022. "The Policy Implications of the Dasgupta Review: Land Use Change and Biodiversity," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 83(4), pages 911-935, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:masfgc:v:28:y:2023:i:3:d:10.1007_s11027-023-10046-9. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.