IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/masfgc/v26y2021i7d10.1007_s11027-021-09969-y.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Scenario-based numerical simulation to predict future water quality for developing robust water management plan: a case study from the Hau River, Vietnam

Author

Listed:
  • Nguyen Hong Duc

    (Hokkaido University
    Can Tho University)

  • Ram Avtar

    (Hokkaido University
    Hokkaido University)

  • Pankaj Kumar

    (Institute for Global Environmental Strategies)

  • Pham Phuong Lan

    (National Economics University)

Abstract

Rapid population growth, urbanization, industrialization, and climate change are the key drivers causing serious water pollution around the globe. Considering the impacts of these key drivers, this study employed the Water Evaluation and Planning (WEAP) simulation tool to simulate the future water quality in a nearly 60-km stretch of the Hau River, Vietnam. The business-as-usual (BAU) scenario; scenarios with measures (WM), i.e., wastewater treatment plants (WWTPs) for treating 75% (WM75) and 100% (WM100) of total future wastewater generated; and the optimistic scenario (WM_Opt., i.e., WM100 + additional treatment plants for river water (RWTPs)) to achieve the desired water quality, were applied to simulate the future Hau River water quality for the year 2030. Result suggests that the average values of biochemical oxygen demand (BOD), total coliform (TC), nitrate (NO3−), and phosphate (PO43−) in the wet season of 2030 under BAU scenario will be increased by 16.01%, 40.85%, 30.49%, and 20.22%, respectively, in comparison to those of the current year, i.e., 2018. In the dry season, these rates will be increased by 27.80%, 65.94%, 31.05%, and 20.64%, respectively. Under the scenario with measures (WM75 and WM100), although the Hau River water quality was improved but did not reach the desired limits, especially for BOD and PO43− levels in the downstream region. However, under the WM_Opt. scenario, the average simulated values of both BOD and PO43− will be significantly declined by 76.53% and 63.96%, respectively as compared to the current situation and help to achieve river water quality under class A. This study is providing policy-relevant scientific information, vital for sustainable water resource management.

Suggested Citation

  • Nguyen Hong Duc & Ram Avtar & Pankaj Kumar & Pham Phuong Lan, 2021. "Scenario-based numerical simulation to predict future water quality for developing robust water management plan: a case study from the Hau River, Vietnam," Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, Springer, vol. 26(7), pages 1-38, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:masfgc:v:26:y:2021:i:7:d:10.1007_s11027-021-09969-y
    DOI: 10.1007/s11027-021-09969-y
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11027-021-09969-y
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s11027-021-09969-y?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Dell'Angelo, Jampel & Rulli, Maria Cristina & D'Odorico, Paolo, 2018. "The Global Water Grabbing Syndrome," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 143(C), pages 276-285.
    2. Thomas E. Downing, 2012. "Views of the frontiers in climate change adaptation economics," Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 3(2), pages 161-170, March.
    3. Heinemann, A. B. & Hoogenboom, G. & de Faria, R. T., 2002. "Determination of spatial water requirements at county and regional levels using crop models and GIS: An example for the State of Parana, Brazil," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 52(3), pages 177-196, January.
    4. Kannel, Prakash Raj & Lee, S. & Lee, Y.-S. & Kanel, S.R. & Pelletier, G.J., 2007. "Application of automated QUAL2Kw for water quality modeling and management in the Bagmati River, Nepal," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 202(3), pages 503-517.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Nguyen Hong Duc & Pankaj Kumar & Pham Phuong Lan & Tonni Agustiono Kurniawan & Khaled Mohamed Khedher & Ali Kharrazi & Osamu Saito & Ram Avtar, 2023. "Hydrochemical indices as a proxy for assessing land-use impacts on water resources: a sustainable management perspective and case study of Can Tho City, Vietnam," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 117(3), pages 2573-2615, July.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Pankaj Kumar & Rajarshi Dasgupta & Manish Ramaiah & Ram Avtar & Brian Alan Johnson & Binaya Kumar Mishra, 2019. "Hydrological Simulation for Predicting the Future Water Quality of Adyar River, Chennai, India," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(23), pages 1-14, November.
    2. Rulli, Maria Cristina & Casirati, Stefano & Dell’Angelo, Jampel & Davis, Kyle Frankel & Passera, Corrado & D’Odorico, Paolo, 2019. "Interdependencies and telecoupling of oil palm expansion at the expense of Indonesian rainforest," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 105(C), pages 499-512.
    3. Dogmus, Özge Can & Nielsen, Jonas Østergaard, 2020. "The on-paper hydropower boom: A case study of corruption in the hydropower sector in Bosnia and Herzegovina," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 172(C).
    4. Karki, Seema & Webb, J Angus & Stewardson, Michael J. & Fowler, Keirnan & Kattel, Giri Raj, 2023. "Basin-scale riverine ecosystem services vary with network geometry," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 63(C).
    5. Samara Soares & Joel Vasco & Paulo Scalize, 2023. "Water Quality Simulation in the Bois River, Goiás, Central Brazil," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-21, February.
    6. Leenhardt, D. & Trouvat, J. -L. & Gonzales, G. & Perarnaud, V. & Prats, S. & Bergez, J. -E., 2004. "Estimating irrigation demand for water management on a regional scale: I. ADEAUMIS, a simulation platform based on bio-decisional modelling and spatial information," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 68(3), pages 207-232, August.
    7. Kebede, Dereje & Emana, Bezabih & Tesfay, Girmay, 2023. "Impact of land acquisition for large-scale agricultural investments on food security status of displaced households: The case of Ethiopia," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 126(C).
    8. Tatlhego, Mokganedi & Chiarelli, Davide Danilo & Rulli, Maria Cristina & D’Odorico, Paolo, 2022. "The value generated by irrigation in the command areas of new agricultural dams in Africa," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 264(C).
    9. Ruxandra Malina Petrescu-Mag & Hamid Rastegari Kopaei & Dacinia Crina Petrescu, 2021. "What Drives Landowners to Resist Selling Their Land? Insights from Ethical Capitalism and Landowners’ Perceptions," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(3), pages 1-21, March.
    10. Zhuohang Xin & Lei Ye & Chi Zhang, 2019. "Application of Export Coefficient Model and QUAL2K for Water Environmental Management in a Rural Watershed," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(21), pages 1-15, October.
    11. Davide Danilo Chiarelli & Paolo D’Odorico & Marc F. Müller & Nathaniel D. Mueller & Kyle Frankel Davis & Jampel Dell’Angelo & Gopal Penny & Maria Cristina Rulli, 2022. "Competition for water induced by transnational land acquisitions for agriculture," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-9, December.
    12. Holguin-Gonzalez, Javier E. & Boets, Pieter & Alvarado, Andres & Cisneros, Felipe & Carrasco, María C. & Wyseure, Guido & Nopens, Ingmar & Goethals, Peter L.M., 2013. "Integrating hydraulic, physicochemical and ecological models to assess the effectiveness of water quality management strategies for the River Cuenca in Ecuador," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 254(C), pages 1-14.
    13. Hirsch, Cornelius & Krisztin, Tamás & See, Linda, 2020. "Water Resources as Determinants for Foreign Direct Investments in Land - A Gravity Analysis of Foreign Land Acquisitions," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 170(C).
    14. Francesco Bellini & Yas Barzegar & Atrin Barzegar & Stefano Marrone & Laura Verde & Patrizio Pisani, 2025. "Sustainable Water Quality Evaluation Based on Cohesive Mamdani and Sugeno Fuzzy Inference System in Tivoli (Italy)," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(2), pages 1-25, January.
    15. Kristin Brandl & Elizabeth Moore & Camille Meyer & Jonathan Doh, 2022. "The impact of multinational enterprises on community informal institutions and rural poverty," Journal of International Business Studies, Palgrave Macmillan;Academy of International Business, vol. 53(6), pages 1133-1152, August.
    16. Pauer, James J. & Auer, Martin T., 2009. "Formulation and testing of a novel river nitrification model," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 220(6), pages 857-866.
    17. Stanton, Muriel C. Bonjean & Roelich, Katy, 2021. "Decision making under deep uncertainties: A review of the applicability of methods in practice," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 171(C).
    18. Muhammad Mazhar Iqbal & Muhammad Shoaib & Hafiz Umar Farid & Jung Lyul Lee, 2018. "Assessment of Water Quality Profile Using Numerical Modeling Approach in Major Climate Classes of Asia," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 15(10), pages 1-26, October.
    19. Chi Truong & Matteo Malavasi & Han Li & Stefan Trueck & Pavel V. Shevchenko, 2024. "Optimal dynamic climate adaptation pathways: a case study of New York City," Papers 2402.02745, arXiv.org.
    20. Lorite, I.J. & Mateos, L. & Orgaz, F. & Fereres, E., 2007. "Assessing deficit irrigation strategies at the level of an irrigation district," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 91(1-3), pages 51-60, July.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:masfgc:v:26:y:2021:i:7:d:10.1007_s11027-021-09969-y. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.