IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/jorgde/v7y2018i1d10.1186_s41469-018-0037-2.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Rocket Internet: organizing a startup factory

Author

Listed:
  • Oliver Baumann

    (University of Southern Denmark)

  • Carsten Bergenholtz

    (Aarhus University)

  • Lars Frederiksen

    (Aarhus University)

  • Robert M. Grant

    (Bocconi University)

  • Rebecca Köhler

    (Telefónica Germany Next GmbH)

  • David L. Preston

    (University of Oregon)

  • Scott Shane

    (Case Western Reserve University)

Abstract

While some firms build cars or smartphones, Rocket Internet builds companies. The incubator and investment firm has pioneered an extreme approach to new venture creation that is often referred to as a “startup factory:” it rapidly assembles and scales new companies, replicating business models that have been developed elsewhere. Separating the ideation of business models from their execution allows Rocket Internet to specialize on the latter, because it eliminates the need to create an environment that is conducive to both processes. Yet specialization may also be Rocket Internet’s largest liability, because it makes the firm dependent on the availability of appropriate (co-specialized) business models. In this edition of the Organization Zoo series, we asked several organizational scientists and scholars of entrepreneurship to share their thoughts on what we can learn from the case of Rocket Internet.

Suggested Citation

  • Oliver Baumann & Carsten Bergenholtz & Lars Frederiksen & Robert M. Grant & Rebecca Köhler & David L. Preston & Scott Shane, 2018. "Rocket Internet: organizing a startup factory," Journal of Organization Design, Springer;Organizational Design Community, vol. 7(1), pages 1-15, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:jorgde:v:7:y:2018:i:1:d:10.1186_s41469-018-0037-2
    DOI: 10.1186/s41469-018-0037-2
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1186/s41469-018-0037-2
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1186/s41469-018-0037-2?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. James G. March, 1991. "Exploration and Exploitation in Organizational Learning," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 2(1), pages 71-87, February.
    2. Hart E. Posen & Dirk Martignoni, 2018. "Revisiting the imitation assumption: Why imitation may increase, rather than decrease, performance heterogeneity," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 39(5), pages 1350-1369, May.
    3. Gompers, Paul & Kovner, Anna & Lerner, Josh & Scharfstein, David, 2010. "Performance persistence in entrepreneurship," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 96(1), pages 18-32, April.
    4. Parker, Simon C., 2013. "Do serial entrepreneurs run successively better-performing businesses?," Journal of Business Venturing, Elsevier, vol. 28(5), pages 652-666.
    5. Toft-Kehler, Rasmus & Wennberg, Karl & Kim, Phillip H., 2014. "Practice makes perfect: Entrepreneurial-experience curves and venture performance," Journal of Business Venturing, Elsevier, vol. 29(4), pages 453-470.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Davidsson, Per & Grégoire, Denis A. & Lex, Maike, 2021. "Venture Idea Assessment (VIA): Development of a needed concept, measure, and research agenda," Journal of Business Venturing, Elsevier, vol. 36(5).
    2. Scheuplein, Christoph, 2022. "Company Builder und ihre Beschäftigungswirkung in Deutschland," Forschung Aktuell 05/2022, Institut Arbeit und Technik (IAT), Westfälische Hochschule, University of Applied Sciences.
    3. Qilun Li & Zhaoyi Xu & Xiaoqin Shen & Jiacheng Zhong, 2022. "Predicting Business Risks of Commercial Banks Based on BP-GA Optimized Model," Computational Economics, Springer;Society for Computational Economics, vol. 59(4), pages 1423-1441, April.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Gottschalk, Sandra & Greene, Francis J. & Höwer, Daniel & Müller, Bettina, 2014. "If you don't succeed, should you try again? The role of entrepreneurial experience in venture survival," ZEW Discussion Papers 14-009, ZEW - Leibniz Centre for European Economic Research.
    2. Rocha, Vera & Pozzoli, Dario, 2021. "Give it Another Shot: Startup Experience and the Mobilization of Human Resources in New Ventures," Working Papers 11-2021, Copenhagen Business School, Department of Economics.
    3. Louise Lindbjerg & Theodor Vladasel, 2021. "Hiring Entrepreneurs for Innovation," Working Papers 1309, Barcelona School of Economics.
    4. Toft-Kehler, Rasmus Vendler & Wennberg, Karl & Kim, Phillip H., 2016. "A little bit of knowledge is a dangerous thing: Entrepreneurial experience and new venture disengagement," Journal of Business Venturing Insights, Elsevier, vol. 6(C), pages 36-46.
    5. Amrita Lahiri & Anu Wadhwa, 2021. "When do serial entrepreneurs found innovative ventures? Evidence from patent data," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 57(4), pages 1973-1993, December.
    6. Lee, Hyeonsuh, 2023. "Unraveling the effect of pre-entry knowledge of founders on experimentation in nascent industries: A configurational approach," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 167(C).
    7. Parker, Owen N. & Mui, Rachel & Bhawe, Nachiket & Semadeni, Matthew, 2022. "Insight or ignorance: How collaborative history in a workgroup fits with project type to shape performance," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 152(C), pages 154-167.
    8. Parker, Simon C., 2013. "Do serial entrepreneurs run successively better-performing businesses?," Journal of Business Venturing, Elsevier, vol. 28(5), pages 652-666.
    9. Simon Parker, 2014. "Who become serial and portfolio entrepreneurs?," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 43(4), pages 887-898, December.
    10. Zunino, Diego & van Praag, Mirjam C. & Dushnitsky, Gary, 2017. "Badge of Honor or Scarlet Letter? Unpacking Investors' Judgment of Entrepreneurs' Past Failure," IZA Discussion Papers 11017, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
    11. Vincenzo Butticè & Carlotta Orsenigo & Mike Wright, 2018. "The effect of information asymmetries on serial crowdfunding and campaign success," Economia e Politica Industriale: Journal of Industrial and Business Economics, Springer;Associazione Amici di Economia e Politica Industriale, vol. 45(2), pages 143-173, June.
    12. Shahid, Pirzada Syed Rizwan, 2023. "Founder's Human Capital and the Entrepreneurial Process Duration," OSF Preprints yf6mg, Center for Open Science.
    13. Patel, Pankaj C. & Tsionas, Mike & Oghazi, Pejvak & Izquierdo, Vanessa, 2022. "No entrepreneur steps in the same river twice: Limited learning advantage for serial entrepreneurs," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 142(C), pages 1038-1052.
    14. Vera Rocha & Luca Grilli, 2024. "Early-stage start-up hiring: the interplay between start-ups’ initial resources and innovation orientation," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 62(4), pages 1641-1668, April.
    15. Fan, Terence & Schwab, Andreas & Geng, Xuesong, 2021. "Habitual entrepreneurship in digital platform ecosystems: A time-contingent model of learning from prior software project experiences," Journal of Business Venturing, Elsevier, vol. 36(5).
    16. Loren Brandt & Ruochen Dai & Gueorgui Kambourov & Kjetil Storesletten & Xiaobo Zhang, 2022. "Serial Entrepreneurship in China," Working Papers tecipa-721, University of Toronto, Department of Economics.
    17. Huatao Peng & Yuming Chang & Yang Liu, 2023. "Risk preference, prior experience, and serial entrepreneurship performance: evidence from China," Asia Pacific Business Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 29(3), pages 613-631, May.
    18. Praag, Mirjam van & Zunino, Diego & Dushnitsky, Gary, 2017. "Badge of Honor or Scarlet Letter? Unpacking Investors’ Judgment of Entrepreneurs’ Past Failure," CEPR Discussion Papers 12329, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
    19. Sewaid, Ahmed & Parker, Simon C. & Kaakeh, Abdulkader, 2021. "Explaining serial crowdfunders' dynamic fundraising performance," Journal of Business Venturing, Elsevier, vol. 36(4).
    20. Hart E. Posen & Sangyoon Yi & Jeho Lee, 2020. "A contingency perspective on imitation strategies: When is “benchmarking” ineffective?," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 41(2), pages 198-221, February.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:jorgde:v:7:y:2018:i:1:d:10.1186_s41469-018-0037-2. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.