IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/joptap/v181y2019i3d10.1007_s10957-019-01488-w.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Augmented Lagrangian Method with Alternating Constraints for Nonlinear Optimization Problems

Author

Listed:
  • Siti Nor Habibah Binti Hassan

    (Universiti Teknikal Malaysia Melaka, Hang Tuah Jaya)

  • Tomohiro Niimi

    (Bank of Japan)

  • Nobuo Yamashita

    (Kyoto University)

Abstract

The augmented Lagrangian method is a classical solution method for nonlinear optimization problems. At each iteration, it minimizes an augmented Lagrangian function that consists of the constraint functions and the corresponding Lagrange multipliers. If the Lagrange multipliers in the augmented Lagrangian function are close to the exact Lagrange multipliers at an optimal solution, the method converges steadily. Since the conventional augmented Lagrangian method uses inaccurate estimated Lagrange multipliers, it sometimes converges slowly. In this paper, we propose a novel augmented Lagrangian method that allows the augmented Lagrangian function and its minimization problem to have variable constraints at each iteration. This allowance enables the new method to get more accurate estimated Lagrange multipliers by exploiting Karush–Kuhn–Tucker points of the subproblems and consequently to converge more efficiently and steadily.

Suggested Citation

  • Siti Nor Habibah Binti Hassan & Tomohiro Niimi & Nobuo Yamashita, 2019. "Augmented Lagrangian Method with Alternating Constraints for Nonlinear Optimization Problems," Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 181(3), pages 883-904, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:joptap:v:181:y:2019:i:3:d:10.1007_s10957-019-01488-w
    DOI: 10.1007/s10957-019-01488-w
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10957-019-01488-w
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10957-019-01488-w?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Sun, Minghe & Aronson, Jay E. & McKeown, Patrick G. & Drinka, Dennis, 1998. "A tabu search heuristic procedure for the fixed charge transportation problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 106(2-3), pages 441-456, April.
    2. G. Liuzzi & S. Lucidi & V. Piccialli, 2016. "Exploiting derivative-free local searches in DIRECT-type algorithms for global optimization," Computational Optimization and Applications, Springer, vol. 65(2), pages 449-475, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Lutz, Christian M. & Roscoe Davis, K. & Sun, Minghe, 1998. "Determining buffer location and size in production lines using tabu search," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 106(2-3), pages 301-316, April.
    2. Mojtaba Akbari & Saber Molla-Alizadeh-Zavardehi & Sadegh Niroomand, 2020. "Meta-heuristic approaches for fixed-charge solid transportation problem in two-stage supply chain network," Operational Research, Springer, vol. 20(1), pages 447-471, March.
    3. Yi Zhao & Qingwan Xue & Xi Zhang, 2018. "Stochastic Empty Container Repositioning Problem with CO 2 Emission Considerations for an Intermodal Transportation System," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(11), pages 1-24, November.
    4. Borisovsky, P. & Dolgui, A. & Eremeev, A., 2009. "Genetic algorithms for a supply management problem: MIP-recombination vs greedy decoder," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 195(3), pages 770-779, June.
    5. E. F. Campana & M. Diez & G. Liuzzi & S. Lucidi & R. Pellegrini & V. Piccialli & F. Rinaldi & A. Serani, 2018. "A multi-objective DIRECT algorithm for ship hull optimization," Computational Optimization and Applications, Springer, vol. 71(1), pages 53-72, September.
    6. Abhijit Baidya & Uttam Kumar Bera, 2019. "New model for addressing supply chain and transport safety for disaster relief operations," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 283(1), pages 33-69, December.
    7. Gurwinder Singh & Amarinder Singh, 2021. "Solving fixed-charge transportation problem using a modified particle swarm optimization algorithm," International Journal of System Assurance Engineering and Management, Springer;The Society for Reliability, Engineering Quality and Operations Management (SREQOM),India, and Division of Operation and Maintenance, Lulea University of Technology, Sweden, vol. 12(6), pages 1073-1086, December.
    8. Pravash Kumar Giri & Manas Kumar Maiti & Manoranjan Maiti, 2023. "Profit maximization fuzzy 4D-TP with budget constraint for breakable substitute items: a swarm based optimization approach," OPSEARCH, Springer;Operational Research Society of India, vol. 60(2), pages 571-615, June.
    9. Dukwon Kim & Xinyan Pan & Panos Pardalos, 2006. "An Enhanced Dynamic Slope Scaling Procedure with Tabu Scheme for Fixed Charge Network Flow Problems," Computational Economics, Springer;Society for Computational Economics, vol. 27(2), pages 273-293, May.
    10. F Altiparmak & I Karaoglan, 2008. "An adaptive tabu-simulated annealing for concave cost transportation problems," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 59(3), pages 331-341, March.
    11. Gen, Mitsuo & Kumar, Anup & Ryul Kim, Jong, 2005. "Recent network design techniques using evolutionary algorithms," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 98(2), pages 251-261, November.
    12. Dimitri J. Papageorgiou & Alejandro Toriello & George L. Nemhauser & Martin W. P. Savelsbergh, 2012. "Fixed-Charge Transportation with Product Blending," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 46(2), pages 281-295, May.
    13. Yixin Zhao & Torbjörn Larsson & Elina Rönnberg & Panos M. Pardalos, 2018. "The fixed charge transportation problem: a strong formulation based on Lagrangian decomposition and column generation," Journal of Global Optimization, Springer, vol. 72(3), pages 517-538, November.
    14. A. N. Balaji & J. Mukund Nilakantan & Izabela Nielsen & N. Jawahar & S. G. Ponnambalam, 2019. "Solving fixed charge transportation problem with truck load constraint using metaheuristics," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 273(1), pages 207-236, February.
    15. Adlakha, Veena & Kowalski, Krzysztof & Lev, Benjamin, 2010. "A branching method for the fixed charge transportation problem," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 38(5), pages 393-397, October.
    16. V. Adlakha & K. Kowalski, 2015. "Fractional Polynomial Bounds for the Fixed Charge Problem," Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 164(3), pages 1026-1038, March.
    17. M. Fernanda P. Costa & Ana Maria A. C. Rocha & Edite M. G. P. Fernandes, 2018. "Filter-based DIRECT method for constrained global optimization," Journal of Global Optimization, Springer, vol. 71(3), pages 517-536, July.
    18. Fred Glover & Hanif Sherali, 2005. "Some Classes of Valid Inequalities and Convex Hull Characterizations for Dynamic Fixed-Charge Problems under Nested Constraints," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 140(1), pages 215-233, November.
    19. Erika Buson & Roberto Roberti & Paolo Toth, 2014. "A Reduced-Cost Iterated Local Search Heuristic for the Fixed-Charge Transportation Problem," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 62(5), pages 1095-1106, October.
    20. Stripinis, Linas & Žilinskas, Julius & Casado, Leocadio G. & Paulavičius, Remigijus, 2021. "On MATLAB experience in accelerating DIRECT-GLce algorithm for constrained global optimization through dynamic data structures and parallelization," Applied Mathematics and Computation, Elsevier, vol. 390(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:joptap:v:181:y:2019:i:3:d:10.1007_s10957-019-01488-w. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.