IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/joptap/v163y2014i1d10.1007_s10957-013-0513-3.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Smoothing Function Approach to Joint Chance-Constrained Programs

Author

Listed:
  • Feng Shan

    (Shenyang University of Aeronautics and Astronautics)

  • Liwei Zhang

    (School of Mathematical Sciences Dalian University of Technology)

  • Xiantao Xiao

    (School of Mathematical Sciences Dalian University of Technology)

Abstract

In this article, we consider a DC (difference of two convex functions) function approach for solving joint chance-constrained programs (JCCP), which was first established by Hong et al. (Oper Res 59:617–630, 2011). They used a DC function to approximate the probability function and constructed a sequential convex approximation method to solve the approximation problem. However, the DC function they used was nondifferentiable. To alleviate this difficulty, we propose a class of smoothing functions to approximate the joint chance-constraint function, based on which smooth optimization problems are constructed to approximate JCCP. We show that the solutions of a sequence of smoothing approximations converge to a Karush–Kuhn–Tucker point of JCCP under a certain asymptotic regime. To implement the proposed method, four examples in the class of smoothing functions are explored. Moreover, the numerical experiments show that our method is comparable and effective.

Suggested Citation

  • Feng Shan & Liwei Zhang & Xiantao Xiao, 2014. "A Smoothing Function Approach to Joint Chance-Constrained Programs," Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 163(1), pages 181-199, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:joptap:v:163:y:2014:i:1:d:10.1007_s10957-013-0513-3
    DOI: 10.1007/s10957-013-0513-3
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10957-013-0513-3
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10957-013-0513-3?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Bruce L. Miller & Harvey M. Wagner, 1965. "Chance Constrained Programming with Joint Constraints," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 13(6), pages 930-945, December.
    2. Darinka Dentcheva & Bogumila Lai & Andrzej Ruszczyński, 2004. "Dual methods for probabilistic optimization problems ," Mathematical Methods of Operations Research, Springer;Gesellschaft für Operations Research (GOR);Nederlands Genootschap voor Besliskunde (NGB), vol. 60(2), pages 331-346, October.
    3. Wenqing Chen & Melvyn Sim & Jie Sun & Chung-Piaw Teo, 2010. "From CVaR to Uncertainty Set: Implications in Joint Chance-Constrained Optimization," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 58(2), pages 470-485, April.
    4. L. Jeff Hong & Yi Yang & Liwei Zhang, 2011. "Sequential Convex Approximations to Joint Chance Constrained Programs: A Monte Carlo Approach," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 59(3), pages 617-630, June.
    5. Martin Branda & Jitka Dupačová, 2012. "Approximation and contamination bounds for probabilistic programs," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 193(1), pages 3-19, March.
    6. ,, 2000. "Problems And Solutions," Econometric Theory, Cambridge University Press, vol. 16(2), pages 287-299, April.
    7. B. K. Pagnoncelli & S. Ahmed & A. Shapiro, 2009. "Sample Average Approximation Method for Chance Constrained Programming: Theory and Applications," Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 142(2), pages 399-416, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Wim Ackooij, 2017. "A comparison of four approaches from stochastic programming for large-scale unit-commitment," EURO Journal on Computational Optimization, Springer;EURO - The Association of European Operational Research Societies, vol. 5(1), pages 119-147, March.
    2. Lukáš Adam & Martin Branda, 2016. "Nonlinear Chance Constrained Problems: Optimality Conditions, Regularization and Solvers," Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 170(2), pages 419-436, August.
    3. Lukáš Adam & Martin Branda & Holger Heitsch & René Henrion, 2020. "Solving joint chance constrained problems using regularization and Benders’ decomposition," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 292(2), pages 683-709, September.
    4. Xiaodi Bai & Jie Sun & Xiaojin Zheng, 2021. "An Augmented Lagrangian Decomposition Method for Chance-Constrained Optimization Problems," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 33(3), pages 1056-1069, July.
    5. Martin Branda & Štěpán Hájek, 2017. "Flow-based formulations for operational fixed interval scheduling problems with random delays," Computational Management Science, Springer, vol. 14(1), pages 161-177, January.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Wang, Tingsong & Meng, Qiang & Wang, Shuaian & Tan, Zhijia, 2013. "Risk management in liner ship fleet deployment: A joint chance constrained programming model," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 60(C), pages 1-12.
    2. L. Jeff Hong & Yi Yang & Liwei Zhang, 2011. "Sequential Convex Approximations to Joint Chance Constrained Programs: A Monte Carlo Approach," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 59(3), pages 617-630, June.
    3. L. Jeff Hong & Zhaolin Hu & Liwei Zhang, 2014. "Conditional Value-at-Risk Approximation to Value-at-Risk Constrained Programs: A Remedy via Monte Carlo," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 26(2), pages 385-400, May.
    4. Yuan Yuan & Zukui Li & Biao Huang, 2017. "Robust optimization approximation for joint chance constrained optimization problem," Journal of Global Optimization, Springer, vol. 67(4), pages 805-827, April.
    5. Minjiao Zhang & Simge Küçükyavuz & Saumya Goel, 2014. "A Branch-and-Cut Method for Dynamic Decision Making Under Joint Chance Constraints," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 60(5), pages 1317-1333, May.
    6. L. Jeff Hong & Zhiyuan Huang & Henry Lam, 2021. "Learning-Based Robust Optimization: Procedures and Statistical Guarantees," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 67(6), pages 3447-3467, June.
    7. M. C. Campi & S. Garatti, 2011. "A Sampling-and-Discarding Approach to Chance-Constrained Optimization: Feasibility and Optimality," Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 148(2), pages 257-280, February.
    8. İhsan Yanıkoğlu & Dick den Hertog, 2013. "Safe Approximations of Ambiguous Chance Constraints Using Historical Data," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 25(4), pages 666-681, November.
    9. Xiaodi Bai & Jie Sun & Xiaojin Zheng, 2021. "An Augmented Lagrangian Decomposition Method for Chance-Constrained Optimization Problems," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 33(3), pages 1056-1069, July.
    10. Algo Carè & Simone Garatti & Marco C. Campi, 2014. "FAST---Fast Algorithm for the Scenario Technique," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 62(3), pages 662-671, June.
    11. Marla, Lavanya & Rikun, Alexander & Stauffer, Gautier & Pratsini, Eleni, 2020. "Robust modeling and planning: Insights from three industrial applications," Operations Research Perspectives, Elsevier, vol. 7(C).
    12. Shao-Wei Lam & Tsan Sheng Ng & Melvyn Sim & Jin-Hwa Song, 2013. "Multiple Objectives Satisficing Under Uncertainty," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 61(1), pages 214-227, February.
    13. Shen Peng & Jie Jiang, 2021. "Stochastic mathematical programs with probabilistic complementarity constraints: SAA and distributionally robust approaches," Computational Optimization and Applications, Springer, vol. 80(1), pages 153-184, September.
    14. Rashed Khanjani-Shiraz & Ali Babapour-Azar & Zohreh Hosseini-Noudeh & Panos M. Pardalos, 2022. "Distributionally robust maximum probability shortest path problem," Journal of Combinatorial Optimization, Springer, vol. 43(1), pages 140-167, January.
    15. Yanikoglu, I. & den Hertog, D., 2011. "Safe Approximations of Chance Constraints Using Historical Data," Other publications TiSEM ab77f6f2-248a-42f1-bde1-0, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.
    16. Chen, Zhen & Archibald, Thomas W., 2024. "Maximizing the survival probability in a cash flow inventory problem with a joint service level constraint," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 270(C).
    17. Yanikoglu, I. & den Hertog, D., 2011. "Safe Approximations of Chance Constraints Using Historical Data," Discussion Paper 2011-137, Tilburg University, Center for Economic Research.
    18. Álvaro Porras & Concepción Domínguez & Juan Miguel Morales & Salvador Pineda, 2023. "Tight and Compact Sample Average Approximation for Joint Chance-Constrained Problems with Applications to Optimal Power Flow," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 35(6), pages 1454-1469, November.
    19. Bazovkin, Pavel & Mosler, Karl, 2011. "Stochastic linear programming with a distortion risk constraint," Discussion Papers in Econometrics and Statistics 6/11, University of Cologne, Institute of Econometrics and Statistics.
    20. Roos, Ernst & den Hertog, Dick, 2019. "Reducing conservatism in robust optimization," Other publications TiSEM ad0238cd-de7a-4366-b487-b, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:joptap:v:163:y:2014:i:1:d:10.1007_s10957-013-0513-3. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.