IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/joptap/v152y2012i1d10.1007_s10957-011-9923-2.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Worst-Case Violation of Sampled Convex Programs for Optimization with Uncertainty

Author

Listed:
  • Takafumi Kanamori

    (Nagoya University)

  • Akiko Takeda

    (Keio University)

Abstract

A deterministic approach called robust optimization has been recently proposed to deal with optimization problems including inexact data, i.e., uncertainty. The basic idea of robust optimization is to seek a solution that is guaranteed to perform well in terms of feasibility and near-optimality for all possible realizations of the uncertain input data. To solve robust optimization problems, Calafiore and Campi have proposed a randomized approach based on sampling of constraints, where the number of samples is determined so that only a small portion of the original constraints is violated by the randomized solution. Our main concern is not only the probability of violation, but also the degree of violation, i.e., the worst-case violation. We derive an upper bound of the worst-case violation for the sampled convex programs and consider the relation between the probability of violation and the worst-case violation. The probability of violation and the degree of violation are simultaneously bounded by a prescribed value when the number of random samples is large enough. In addition, a confidence interval of the optimal value is obtained when the objective function includes uncertainty. Our method is applicable to not only a bounded uncertainty set but also an unbounded one. Hence, the scope of our method includes random sampling following an unbounded distribution such as the normal distribution.

Suggested Citation

  • Takafumi Kanamori & Akiko Takeda, 2012. "Worst-Case Violation of Sampled Convex Programs for Optimization with Uncertainty," Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 152(1), pages 171-197, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:joptap:v:152:y:2012:i:1:d:10.1007_s10957-011-9923-2
    DOI: 10.1007/s10957-011-9923-2
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10957-011-9923-2
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10957-011-9923-2?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Daniela Pucci de Farias & Benjamin Van Roy, 2004. "On Constraint Sampling in the Linear Programming Approach to Approximate Dynamic Programming," Mathematics of Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 29(3), pages 462-478, August.
    2. A. Ben-Tal & A. Nemirovski, 1998. "Robust Convex Optimization," Mathematics of Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 23(4), pages 769-805, November.
    3. D. Goldfarb & G. Iyengar, 2003. "Robust Portfolio Selection Problems," Mathematics of Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 28(1), pages 1-38, February.
    4. Akiko Takeda & Shunsuke Taguchi & Tsutomu Tanaka, 2010. "A relaxation algorithm with a probabilistic guarantee for robust deviation optimization," Computational Optimization and Applications, Springer, vol. 47(1), pages 1-31, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Andrew Romich & Guanghui Lan & J. Cole Smith, 2015. "A robust sensor covering and communication problem," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 62(7), pages 582-594, October.
    2. Bo Wei & William B. Haskell & Sixiang Zhao, 2020. "The CoMirror algorithm with random constraint sampling for convex semi-infinite programming," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 295(2), pages 809-841, December.
    3. Ramponi, Federico Alessandro & Campi, Marco C., 2018. "Expected shortfall: Heuristics and certificates," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 267(3), pages 1003-1013.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. L. Jeff Hong & Zhiyuan Huang & Henry Lam, 2021. "Learning-Based Robust Optimization: Procedures and Statistical Guarantees," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 67(6), pages 3447-3467, June.
    2. Raphael Hauser & Vijay Krishnamurthy & Reha Tutuncu, 2013. "Relative Robust Portfolio Optimization," Papers 1305.0144, arXiv.org, revised May 2013.
    3. Michal Houda, 2007. "Role of Dependence in Chance-constrained and Robust Programming [Role závislosti v úlohách s pravděpodobnostními omezeními a v úlohách robustního programování]," Acta Oeconomica Pragensia, Prague University of Economics and Business, vol. 2007(4), pages 111-120.
    4. Erick Delage & Yinyu Ye, 2010. "Distributionally Robust Optimization Under Moment Uncertainty with Application to Data-Driven Problems," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 58(3), pages 595-612, June.
    5. Vaughn Gambeta & Roy Kwon, 2020. "Risk Return Trade-Off in Relaxed Risk Parity Portfolio Optimization," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 13(10), pages 1-28, October.
    6. Maillet, Bertrand & Tokpavi, Sessi & Vaucher, Benoit, 2015. "Global minimum variance portfolio optimisation under some model risk: A robust regression-based approach," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 244(1), pages 289-299.
    7. Kang, Yan-li & Tian, Jing-Song & Chen, Chen & Zhao, Gui-Yu & Li, Yuan-fu & Wei, Yu, 2021. "Entropy based robust portfolio," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 583(C).
    8. Hakan Kaya, 2017. "Managing ambiguity in asset allocation," Journal of Asset Management, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 18(3), pages 163-187, May.
    9. Taozeng Zhu & Jingui Xie & Melvyn Sim, 2022. "Joint Estimation and Robustness Optimization," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 68(3), pages 1659-1677, March.
    10. Fernando Ordóñez & Nicolás E. Stier-Moses, 2010. "Wardrop Equilibria with Risk-Averse Users," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 44(1), pages 63-86, February.
    11. Ben-Tal, A. & den Hertog, D. & De Waegenaere, A.M.B. & Melenberg, B. & Rennen, G., 2011. "Robust Solutions of Optimization Problems Affected by Uncertain Probabilities," Other publications TiSEM 4d43dc51-86d9-4804-8563-9, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.
    12. Aharon Ben-Tal & Dimitris Bertsimas & David B. Brown, 2010. "A Soft Robust Model for Optimization Under Ambiguity," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 58(4-part-2), pages 1220-1234, August.
    13. Kolm, Petter N. & Tütüncü, Reha & Fabozzi, Frank J., 2014. "60 Years of portfolio optimization: Practical challenges and current trends," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 234(2), pages 356-371.
    14. Li Chen & Simai He & Shuzhong Zhang, 2011. "Tight Bounds for Some Risk Measures, with Applications to Robust Portfolio Selection," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 59(4), pages 847-865, August.
    15. Lotfi, Somayyeh & Zeniosn, Stravros A., 2016. "Equivalence of Robust VaR and CVaR Optimization," Working Papers 16-03, University of Pennsylvania, Wharton School, Weiss Center.
    16. Erindi Allaj, 2020. "The Black–Litterman model and views from a reverse optimization procedure: an out-of-sample performance evaluation," Computational Management Science, Springer, vol. 17(3), pages 465-492, October.
    17. Katrin Schöttle & Ralf Werner & Rudi Zagst, 2010. "Comparison and robustification of Bayes and Black-Litterman models," Mathematical Methods of Operations Research, Springer;Gesellschaft für Operations Research (GOR);Nederlands Genootschap voor Besliskunde (NGB), vol. 71(3), pages 453-475, June.
    18. Aharon Ben-Tal & Dick den Hertog & Anja De Waegenaere & Bertrand Melenberg & Gijs Rennen, 2013. "Robust Solutions of Optimization Problems Affected by Uncertain Probabilities," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 59(2), pages 341-357, April.
    19. Bram L. Gorissen & Hans Blanc & Dick den Hertog & Aharon Ben-Tal, 2014. "Technical Note---Deriving Robust and Globalized Robust Solutions of Uncertain Linear Programs with General Convex Uncertainty Sets," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 62(3), pages 672-679, June.
    20. Wong, Man Hong, 2013. "Investment models based on clustered scenario trees," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 227(2), pages 314-324.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:joptap:v:152:y:2012:i:1:d:10.1007_s10957-011-9923-2. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.