IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/joprea/v39y2022i1d10.1007_s12546-022-09279-3.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Contemporary family sponsorship and older parent reunification immigration under New Zealand’s neoliberal immigration regime

Author

Listed:
  • Liangni Sally Liu

    (Massey University, Albany Campus)

  • Guanyu Jason Ran

    (Waikato Institute of Technology)

Abstract

A neoliberal immigration regime often takes an “economic” lens to frame and reframe immigration regulation based on a rational cost–benefit analysis of what immigration might bring to immigration-receiving countries. Under such a regime, skilled and business immigration is framed as an “economic” immigration category, which can channel in financial and human capital, while family and international humanitarian immigration is regarded as a “social” immigration category assumed to produce immigrants who are more dependent and not able to bring immediate and direct economic gain for immigrant-receiving countries. In New Zealand (NZ), such a neoliberal trend is very much alive within its contemporary immigration policy development. The paper aims to illustrate the neoliberal trend of NZ immigration policy that relates to the entry of immigrants’ family members, especially the older parents. In order to achieve this goal, a detailed review of the evolving NZ family immigration policy over the last three decades and a descriptive analysis of NZ family immigration intake will be presented. By combining the policy review and descriptive analysis together, the paper can inform a better understanding of how the neoliberal immigration regime has had an impact on the patterns of family immigration in NZ.

Suggested Citation

  • Liangni Sally Liu & Guanyu Jason Ran, 2022. "Contemporary family sponsorship and older parent reunification immigration under New Zealand’s neoliberal immigration regime," Journal of Population Research, Springer, vol. 39(1), pages 73-95, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:joprea:v:39:y:2022:i:1:d:10.1007_s12546-022-09279-3
    DOI: 10.1007/s12546-022-09279-3
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s12546-022-09279-3
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s12546-022-09279-3?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Mathias Czaika & Hein De Haas, 2013. "The Effectiveness of Immigration Policies," Population and Development Review, The Population Council, Inc., vol. 39(3), pages 487-508, September.
    2. Richard Bedford & Paul Spoonley, 2014. "Competing for Talent: Diffusion of An Innovation in New Zealand's Immigration Policy," International Migration Review, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 48(3), pages 891-911, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Kate Golebiowska, 2016. "Are Peripheral Regions Benefiting from National Policies Aimed at Attracting Skilled Migrants? Case Study of the Northern Territory of Australia," Journal of International Migration and Integration, Springer, vol. 17(3), pages 947-971, August.
    2. Michael Trebilcock, 2019. "The Puzzle of Canadian Exceptionalism in Contemporary Immigration Policy," Journal of International Migration and Integration, Springer, vol. 20(3), pages 823-849, August.
    3. Matilde Rosina, 2024. "Criminalising Migration: The Vicious Cycle of Insecurity and Irregularity," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 13(10), pages 1-19, October.
    4. Albert MILLOGO & Ines TROJETTE & Nicolas PÉRIDY, 2021. "Are government policies efficient to regulate immigration? Evidence from France," Region et Developpement, Region et Developpement, LEAD, Universite du Sud - Toulon Var, vol. 53, pages 23-49.
    5. Melissa Mouthaan, 2021. "Old Wine in New Bottles? The European Union's Organizational Response to Reforming EU–African Migration Cooperation," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 59(5), pages 1177-1194, September.
    6. Marek Piotrowski & Anna Organiściak-Krzykowska, 2021. "Seasonal Employment of Foreigners in a Country Implementing a Restrictive Immigration Policy: The Case of Poland," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(Special 3), pages 439-453.
    7. Cebreros Alfonso & Chiquiar Daniel & Roa Mónica & Tobal Martín, 2017. "Notes to Understand Migration Policy with International Trade Theoretical Tools," Working Papers 2017-03, Banco de México.
    8. Juan Luis Manfredi-Sánchez, 2020. "Sanctuary Cities: What Global Migration Means for Local Governments," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 9(8), pages 1-16, August.
    9. Yousaf Ali & Asadullah Khan & Ghani Khan & Amin Ullah Khan & Zeeshan Ahmad, 2021. "Evaluation of Effectiveness of Fence on a Country’s Border: a Case Study of Pak-Afghan Border Fence," Journal of International Migration and Integration, Springer, vol. 22(2), pages 769-790, June.
    10. Katherine H. Tennis & Rachel Sullivan Robinson, 2020. "Where Do Population Policies Come From? Copying in African Fertility and Refugee Policies," Population Research and Policy Review, Springer;Southern Demographic Association (SDA), vol. 39(2), pages 175-205, April.
    11. Irastorza, Nahikari & Emilsson, Henrik, 2020. "The Effects of the 2008 Labour-Migration Reform in Sweden: An Analysis of Income," GLO Discussion Paper Series 680, Global Labor Organization (GLO).
    12. Bruno Schoumaker & Mireille Le Guen & Louise Caron & Wanli Nie, 2022. "Multiple (il)legal pathways: The diversity of immigrants' legal trajectories in Belgium," Demographic Research, Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research, Rostock, Germany, vol. 47(10), pages 247-290.
    13. Cris Beauchemin & Marine Haddad & Mamady Cisse & Christelle Nagnonhou & Lucas Ondicolberry & Andreas Priambodo, 2024. "Politique d’immigration, statut légal et fécondité des migrantes : le cas de Mayotte," Working Papers 297, French Institute for Demographic Studies.
    14. Leonardo Salvatore Alaimo & Francesco Amato & Filomena Maggino & Alfonso Piscitelli & Emiliano Seri, 2023. "A Comparison of Migrant Integration Policies via Mixture of Matrix-Normals," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 165(2), pages 473-494, January.
    15. Burzyński, Michał, 2018. "Time, Space, And Skills In Designing Migration Policy," Journal of Demographic Economics, Cambridge University Press, vol. 84(4), pages 355-417, December.
    16. Mihaela MATEI & Monica ROMAN & Alexandru FLOREA & Adina IORGANDA, 2020. "International migration policies in two post-communist countries: comparative evidence from Romania and Poland," Eastern Journal of European Studies, Centre for European Studies, Alexandru Ioan Cuza University, vol. 11, pages 427-448, December.
    17. Michael A. Clemens, 2014. "Does development reduce migration?," Chapters, in: Robert E.B. Lucas (ed.), International Handbook on Migration and Economic Development, chapter 6, pages 152-185, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    18. Beverelli, Cosimo & Orefice, Gianluca, 2019. "Migration deflection: The role of Preferential Trade Agreements," Regional Science and Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 79(C).
    19. Andrea Pettrachin & Leila Hadj Abdou, 2024. "Beyond evidence-based policymaking? Exploring knowledge formation and source effects in US migration policymaking," Policy Sciences, Springer;Society of Policy Sciences, vol. 57(1), pages 3-28, March.
    20. Kuschminder, Katie & Koser, Khalid, 2017. "The role of migration-specific and migration-relevant policies in migrant decision-making in transit," MERIT Working Papers 2017-022, United Nations University - Maastricht Economic and Social Research Institute on Innovation and Technology (MERIT).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:joprea:v:39:y:2022:i:1:d:10.1007_s12546-022-09279-3. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.