IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/joiaen/v10y2021i1d10.1186_s13731-021-00163-7.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Culture, innovation, and economic development

Author

Listed:
  • Pantelis C. Kostis

    (National and Kapodistrian University of Athens
    Hellenic Open University)

Abstract

During recent decades, culture is gaining more and more attention as a factor that determines economic outcomes. Trying to investigate its role on innovation and economic development, this paper uses a dataset that offers the potential for a cross-sectional and time series analysis. Thus, in this paper, the effects of culture on innovation (as measured by patent applications, spending on R&D, number or researchers per 1000 individuals and number of government researchers) and economic development are investigated. Cultural background is captured through the Schwartz’s cultural values, as reported through the European Social Survey (ESS) waves during the period 2002–2018. The dataset is comprised by 18 Eurozone countries. Using principal component analyses to capture the Schwartz’s cultural values, as well as two ways fixed-effects analysis (FE), time dummies for each ESS wave included in the analysis and cluster—robust estimates of the standard errors, in order to examine the above relationships, the main conclusions derived from the analysis are that (a) there is significant effect of culture on innovation and economic development, and (b) the main cultural dimensions that hinder innovation and economic development are the prevalence of hierarchy, affective autonomy, and mastery. These results hold for all different dependent variables used in the analysis. Thus, when hierarchy, affective autonomy, and mastery are present innovation and economic development are hindered, leading to obstacles regarding the sustainability of economic outcomes. The opposite holds in societies where embeddedness, egalitarianism, and harmony prevail.

Suggested Citation

  • Pantelis C. Kostis, 2021. "Culture, innovation, and economic development," Journal of Innovation and Entrepreneurship, Springer, vol. 10(1), pages 1-16, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:joiaen:v:10:y:2021:i:1:d:10.1186_s13731-021-00163-7
    DOI: 10.1186/s13731-021-00163-7
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1186/s13731-021-00163-7
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1186/s13731-021-00163-7?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ericka Molina-Ramírez & Virginia Barba-Sánchez, 2021. "Embeddedness as a Differentiating Element of Indigenous Entrepreneurship: Insights from Mexico," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-19, February.
    2. Zhang Zhen & Zahid Yousaf & Magdalena Radulescu & Muhammad Yasir, 2021. "Nexus of Digital Organizational Culture, Capabilities, Organizational Readiness, and Innovation: Investigation of SMEs Operating in the Digital Economy," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(2), pages 1-15, January.
    3. Maurizio Carta & Daniele Ronsivalle & Barbara Lino, 2020. "Inner Archipelagos in Sicily. From Culture-Based Development to Creativity-Oriented Evolution," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(18), pages 1-20, September.
    4. Anna Michna & Roman Kmieciak, 2020. "Open-Mindedness Culture, Knowledge-Sharing, Financial Performance, and Industry 4.0 in SMEs," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(21), pages 1-17, October.
    5. Sung Ook Park & Seung Uk Choi & Seong Tae Kim & Hyung Jong Na, 2021. "The Relationship between Corporate Culture and Value at Different Life Cycle Stages," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-19, February.
    6. Kostis, Pantelis C. & Kafka, Kyriaki I. & Petrakis, Panagiotis E., 2018. "Cultural change and innovation performance," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 88(C), pages 306-313.
    7. Olufunke P. Adebayo & Rowland E. Worlu & Chinonye L. Moses & Olaleke O. Ogunnaike, 2020. "An Integrated Organisational Culture for Sustainable Environmental Performance in the Nigerian Context," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(20), pages 1-15, October.
    8. Shane, Scott, 1993. "Cultural influences on national rates of innovation," Journal of Business Venturing, Elsevier, vol. 8(1), pages 59-73, January.
    9. Józef Ober, 2020. "Innovation Adoption: Empirical Analysis on the Example of Selected Factors of Organizational Culture in the IT Industry in Poland," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(20), pages 1-25, October.
    10. Abang Azlan Mohamad & T. Ramayah & May Chiun Lo, 2020. "Sustainable Knowledge Management and Firm Innovativeness: The Contingent Role of Innovative Culture," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(17), pages 1-15, August.
    11. Petrakis, Panagiotis E. & Kostis, Pantelis C. & Kafka, Kyriaki I., 2016. "Secular stagnation, faltering innovation, and high uncertainty: New-era entrepreneurship appraisal using knowledge-based thinking," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 69(5), pages 1909-1913.
    12. JinHyo Joseph Yun & Xiaofei Zhao & KwangHo Jung & Tan Yigitcanlar, 2020. "The Culture for Open Innovation Dynamics," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(12), pages 1-21, June.
    13. Petrakis, Panagiotis E. & Kostis, Pantelis C. & Valsamis, Dionysis G., 2015. "Innovation and competitiveness: Culture as a long-term strategic instrument during the European Great Recession," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 68(7), pages 1436-1438.
    14. Carlos Fernandez-Jardon & Xavier Martinez-Cobas & Fabian Martinez-Ortiz, 2020. "Technology and Culture in Subsistence Small Businesses," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(22), pages 1-13, November.
    15. Bakas, Dimitrios & Kostis, Pantelis & Petrakis, Panagiotis, 2020. "Culture and labour productivity: An empirical investigation," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 85(C), pages 233-243.
    16. Panagiotis E. Petrakis, 2014. "Culture, Growth and Economic Policy," Springer Books, Springer, edition 127, number 978-3-642-41440-4, December.
    17. Scott Shane, 1995. "Uncertainty Avoidance and the Preference for Innovation Championing Roles," Journal of International Business Studies, Palgrave Macmillan;Academy of International Business, vol. 26(1), pages 47-68, March.
    18. Leal-Rodríguez, Antonio L. & Ariza-Montes, José A. & Roldán, José L. & Leal-Millán, Antonio G., 2014. "Absorptive capacity, innovation and cultural barriers: A conditional mediation model," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 67(5), pages 763-768.
    19. Kyriaki I. Kafka & Pantelis C. Kostis & Panagiotis E. Petrakis, 2020. "Why Coevolution of Culture and Institutions Matters for Economic Development and Growth?," Chapters, in: Ryan Merlin Yonk & Vito Bobek (ed.), Perspectives on Economic Development - Public Policy, Culture, and Economic Development, IntechOpen.
    20. Petrakis, Panagiotis & Kostis, Pantelis, 2013. "Economic growth and cultural change," Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics (formerly The Journal of Socio-Economics), Elsevier, vol. 47(C), pages 147-157.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Marvello Yang & Norizan Jaafar & Abdullah Al Mamun & Anas A. Salameh & Noorshella Che Nawi, 2022. "Modelling the significance of strategic orientation for competitive advantage and economic sustainability: the use of hybrid SEM–neural network analysis," Journal of Innovation and Entrepreneurship, Springer, vol. 11(1), pages 1-28, December.
    2. Olayinka Oyekola & Samuel Odewunmi, 2023. "The consequence of societal secrecy for financial constraints," Discussion Papers 2303, University of Exeter, Department of Economics.
    3. Oyekola, Olayinka & Odewunmi, Samuel, 2023. "The consequence of societal secrecy for the financial constraints faced by firms," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 228(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Kostis, Pantelis C. & Kafka, Kyriaki I. & Petrakis, Panagiotis E., 2018. "Cultural change and innovation performance," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 88(C), pages 306-313.
    2. Barreto, Tais S. & Lanivich, Stephen E. & Cox, Kevin C., 2022. "Temporal orientation as a robust predictor of innovation," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 138(C), pages 287-300.
    3. Ucar, Erdem, 2018. "Local creative culture and corporate innovation," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 91(C), pages 60-70.
    4. Petrakis, Panagiotis E. & Kostis, Pantelis C. & Valsamis, Dionysis G., 2015. "Innovation and competitiveness: Culture as a long-term strategic instrument during the European Great Recession," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 68(7), pages 1436-1438.
    5. Aikaterini Koumoutsea & Paraskevi Boufounou & George Mergos, 2023. "Evaluating the Creative Economy Applying the Contingent Valuation Method: A Case Study on the Greek Cultural Heritage Festival," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(23), pages 1-19, November.
    6. Luo, Kun & Lim, Edwin KiaYang & Qu, Wen & Zhang, Xuan, 2021. "Board cultural diversity, government intervention and corporate innovation effectiveness: Evidence from China," Journal of Contemporary Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 17(2).
    7. Kafka, Kyriaki I. & Kostis, Pantelis C., 2021. "Post-materialism and economic growth: Cultural backlash, 1981–2019," Journal of Comparative Economics, Elsevier, vol. 49(4), pages 901-917.
    8. Uzuegbunam, Ikenna & Geringer, J. Michael, 2021. "Culture, connectedness, and international adoption of disruptive innovation," Journal of International Management, Elsevier, vol. 27(1).
    9. David Urbano & Sebastian Aparicio & Victor Querol, 2016. "Social progress orientation and innovative entrepreneurship: an international analysis," Journal of Evolutionary Economics, Springer, vol. 26(5), pages 1033-1066, December.
    10. Fan, Di & Li, Yi & Chen, Liang, 2017. "Configuring innovative societies: The crossvergent role of cultural and institutional varieties," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 66, pages 43-56.
    11. Ramón Campos-Blázquez, Juan & Rubio-Andrada, Luis & Soledad Celemín-Pedroche, María, 2023. "Voices from within. To what extent can internal crowdsourcing drive a change in organizational culture?," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 157(C).
    12. Mario Rosique-Blasco & Antonia Madrid-Guijarro & Domingo García-Pérez-de-Lema, 2018. "The effects of personal abilities and self-efficacy on entrepreneurial intentions," International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, Springer, vol. 14(4), pages 1025-1052, December.
    13. Malik, Tariq H. & Xiang, Tao & Huo, Chunhui, 2021. "The transformation of national patents for high-technology exports: Moderating effects of national cultures," International Business Review, Elsevier, vol. 30(1).
    14. Daniel L. Bennett & Boris Nikolaev, 2021. "Individualism, pro-market institutions, and national innovation," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 57(4), pages 2085-2106, December.
    15. Tiessen, James H., 1997. "Individualism, collectivism, and entrepreneurship: A framework for international comparative research," Journal of Business Venturing, Elsevier, vol. 12(5), pages 367-384, September.
    16. Bakas, Dimitrios & Kostis, Pantelis & Petrakis, Panagiotis, 2020. "Culture and labour productivity: An empirical investigation," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 85(C), pages 233-243.
    17. Delerue, Hélène & Lejeune, Albert, 2011. "Managerial secrecy and intellectual asset protection in SMEs: The role of institutional environment," Journal of International Management, Elsevier, vol. 17(2), pages 130-142, June.
    18. James C. Hayton & Gerard George & Shaker A. Zahra, 2002. "National Culture and Entrepreneurship : A Review of Behavioral Research," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 26(4), pages 33-52, July.
    19. Daniel L. Bennett & Boris Nikolaev, 2021. "Historical Disease Prevalence, Cultural Values, and Global Innovation," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 45(1), pages 145-174, January.
    20. Duygu Buyukyazici & Francesco Serti, 2022. "Religiosity and Innovation Attitudes: An Instrumental Variables Analysis," Papers 2206.00509, arXiv.org, revised Jun 2022.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:joiaen:v:10:y:2021:i:1:d:10.1186_s13731-021-00163-7. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.