IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/joheur/v30y2024i5d10.1007_s10732-024-09529-y.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Mathematical models and solving methods for diversity and equity optimization

Author

Listed:
  • Rafael Martí

    (University of Valencia)

  • Francisco Parreño

    (University of Castilla-La Mancha)

  • Jorge Mortes

    (LS2N, UMR CNRS 6004
    HEC Montréal)

Abstract

Discrete diversity optimization basically consists of selecting a subset of elements of a given set in such a way that the sum of their pairwise distances is maximized. Equity, on the other hand, refers to minimizing the difference between the maximum and the minimum distances in the subset of selected elements to balance their diversity. Both problems have been studied in the combinatorial optimization literature, but recently major drawbacks in their classic mathematical formulations have been identified. We propose new mathematical models to overcome these limitations, including multi-objective optimization, and heuristics to solve large-size instances of them. Specifically, we propose a matheuristic based on the CMSA framework for diversity and a GRASP heuristic for equity. Our extensive experimentation compares the original models with the new proposals by analyzing the solutions of our heuristics and those of the previous approaches, both from a single objective and a bi-objective paradigm. We also evaluate their quality with respect to the optimal solutions obtained with CPLEX, size permitting. Statistical analysis allows us to draw significant conclusions.

Suggested Citation

  • Rafael Martí & Francisco Parreño & Jorge Mortes, 2024. "Mathematical models and solving methods for diversity and equity optimization," Journal of Heuristics, Springer, vol. 30(5), pages 291-323, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:joheur:v:30:y:2024:i:5:d:10.1007_s10732-024-09529-y
    DOI: 10.1007/s10732-024-09529-y
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10732-024-09529-y
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10732-024-09529-y?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Erkut, Erhan & Neuman, Susan, 1989. "Analytical models for locating undesirable facilities," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 40(3), pages 275-291, June.
    2. Fred Glover & Vicente Campos & Rafael Martí, 2021. "Tabu search tutorial. A Graph Drawing Application," TOP: An Official Journal of the Spanish Society of Statistics and Operations Research, Springer;Sociedad de Estadística e Investigación Operativa, vol. 29(2), pages 319-350, July.
    3. Daniel Porumbel & Jin-Kao Hao & Fred Glover, 2011. "A simple and effective algorithm for the MaxMin diversity problem," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 186(1), pages 275-293, June.
    4. Sayyady, Fatemeh & Fathi, Yahya, 2016. "An integer programming approach for solving the p-dispersion problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 253(1), pages 216-225.
    5. Fred Glover & Vicente Campos & Rafael Martí, 2021. "Rejoinder on: Tabu search tutorial. A Graph Drawing Application," TOP: An Official Journal of the Spanish Society of Statistics and Operations Research, Springer;Sociedad de Estadística e Investigación Operativa, vol. 29(2), pages 363-371, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Martí, Rafael & Martínez-Gavara, Anna & Pérez-Peló, Sergio & Sánchez-Oro, Jesús, 2022. "A review on discrete diversity and dispersion maximization from an OR perspective," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 299(3), pages 795-813.
    2. Aringhieri, Roberto & Cordone, Roberto & Grosso, Andrea, 2015. "Construction and improvement algorithms for dispersion problems," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 242(1), pages 21-33.
    3. Parreño, Francisco & Álvarez-Valdés, Ramón & Martí, Rafael, 2021. "Measuring diversity. A review and an empirical analysis," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 289(2), pages 515-532.
    4. Amirgaliyeva, Zhazira & Mladenović, Nenad & Todosijević, Raca & Urošević, Dragan, 2017. "Solving the maximum min-sum dispersion by alternating formulations of two different problems," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 260(2), pages 444-459.
    5. Sayah, David & Irnich, Stefan, 2017. "A new compact formulation for the discrete p-dispersion problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 256(1), pages 62-67.
    6. David Sayah & Stefan Irnich, 2015. "A New Compact Formulation for Discrete p-Dispersion," Working Papers 1517, Gutenberg School of Management and Economics, Johannes Gutenberg-Universität Mainz.
    7. Juan F. Gomez & Anna Martínez-Gavara & Javier Panadero & Angel A. Juan & Rafael Martí, 2024. "A Forward–Backward Simheuristic for the Stochastic Capacitated Dispersion Problem," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 12(6), pages 1-22, March.
    8. Juan F. Gomez & Javier Panadero & Rafael D. Tordecilla & Juliana Castaneda & Angel A. Juan, 2022. "A Multi-Start Biased-Randomized Algorithm for the Capacitated Dispersion Problem," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 10(14), pages 1-20, July.
    9. J. Redondo & J. Fernández & I. García & P. Ortigosa, 2009. "A robust and efficient algorithm for planar competitive location problems," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 167(1), pages 87-105, March.
    10. Malgorzata Miklas-Kalczynska & Pawel Kalczynski, 2024. "Multiple obnoxious facility location: the case of protected areas," Computational Management Science, Springer, vol. 21(1), pages 1-21, June.
    11. Romero-Morales, Dolores & Carrizosa, Emilio & Conde, Eduardo, 1997. "Semi-obnoxious location models: A global optimization approach," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 102(2), pages 295-301, October.
    12. Lili Mei & Deshi Ye & Yong Zhang, 2018. "Approximation strategy-proof mechanisms for obnoxious facility location on a line," Journal of Combinatorial Optimization, Springer, vol. 36(2), pages 549-571, August.
    13. H. W. Hamacher & S. Nickel, 1995. "Restricted planar location problems and applications," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 42(6), pages 967-992, September.
    14. Paul Berglund & Changhyun Kwon, 2014. "Robust Facility Location Problem for Hazardous Waste Transportation," Networks and Spatial Economics, Springer, vol. 14(1), pages 91-116, March.
    15. Yapicioglu, Haluk & Smith, Alice E. & Dozier, Gerry, 2007. "Solving the semi-desirable facility location problem using bi-objective particle swarm," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 177(2), pages 733-749, March.
    16. Mete Suleyman & Cil Zeynel Abidin & Özceylan Eren, 2018. "Location and Coverage Analysis of Bike- Sharing Stations in University Campus," Business Systems Research, Sciendo, vol. 9(2), pages 80-95, July.
    17. González, Javier Serrano & Gonzalez Rodriguez, Angel G. & Mora, José Castro & Santos, Jesús Riquelme & Payan, Manuel Burgos, 2010. "Optimization of wind farm turbines layout using an evolutive algorithm," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 35(8), pages 1671-1681.
    18. Rennen, G., 2008. "Subset Selection from Large Datasets for Kriging Modeling," Discussion Paper 2008-26, Tilburg University, Center for Economic Research.
    19. R. L. Francis & T. J. Lowe & Arie Tamir, 2000. "Aggregation Error Bounds for a Class of Location Models," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 48(2), pages 294-307, April.
    20. O Berman & Q Wang, 2007. "Locating semi-obnoxious facilities with expropriation: minisum criterion," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 58(3), pages 378-390, March.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:joheur:v:30:y:2024:i:5:d:10.1007_s10732-024-09529-y. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.