IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/jknowl/v9y2018i3d10.1007_s13132-016-0375-7.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Knowledge Management Research in the Construction Industry: a Review

Author

Listed:
  • Dengke Yu

    (Nanchang University)

  • Jay Yang

    (Queensland University of Technology)

Abstract

Knowledge management (KM) is important to the knowledge-intensive construction industry. The diversified and changing nature of works in this field warrants us to stocktake, identify changes, and map out KM research framework for future exploration. The study involves three aspects. First, three stages of KM research in construction were distinguished in terms of the time distribution of 217 target publications. Major topics in the stages were extracted for understanding the changes of research emphasis from evolutionary perspective. Second, the past works were summed up in a three-dimensional research framework in terms of management organization, managerial methodology and approach, and managerial objective. Finally, potential research orientations in the future were predicted to expand the existing research framework. It was found that (1) KM research has significantly blossomed in the last two decades with a great potential; (2) major topics of KM were changing in terms of technology, technique, organization, attribute of knowledge, and research objectives; (3) past KM studies centred around management organization, managerial methodology and approach, and managerial objective, thus a three-dimensional research framework was proposed; (4) within the research framework, team-level, project-level, and firm-level KM were studied to achieve project, organizational, and competitive objectives by integrated methodologies of information technology, social technique, and KM process tool; and (5) nine potential research orientations were predicted corresponding to the three dimensions. Finally, an expanded research framework was proposed to encourage and guide future research works in this field. The paper only focused on the construction industry. The findings need further exploration in order to discover any possible missing important research works which were not published in English or not included in the time period. The paper formed a systematic framework of KM research in construction and predicted the potential research orientations. It provides much value for the researchers who want to understand the past and the future of global KM research in the construction industry.

Suggested Citation

  • Dengke Yu & Jay Yang, 2018. "Knowledge Management Research in the Construction Industry: a Review," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 9(3), pages 782-803, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:jknowl:v:9:y:2018:i:3:d:10.1007_s13132-016-0375-7
    DOI: 10.1007/s13132-016-0375-7
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s13132-016-0375-7
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s13132-016-0375-7?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Charles Egbu, 1999. "Skills, knowledge and competencies for managing construction refurbishment works," Construction Management and Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 17(1), pages 29-43.
    2. Sepani Senaratne & Martin Sexton, 2008. "Managing construction project change: a knowledge management perspective," Construction Management and Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 26(12), pages 1303-1311.
    3. Shu-Ling Lu & Martin Sexton, 2006. "Innovation in small construction knowledge-intensive professional service firms: a case study of an architectural practice," Construction Management and Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 24(12), pages 1269-1282.
    4. Rita YI MAN LI & Sun WAH POON, 2009. "Future Motivation In Construction Safety Knowledge Sharing By Means Of Information Technology In Hong Kong," Journal of Applied Economic Sciences, Spiru Haret University, Faculty of Financial Management and Accounting Craiova, vol. 4(3(9)_Fall).
    5. Wai-Ki Fu & Hing-Po Lo & Derek Drew, 2006. "Collective learning, collective knowledge and learning networks in construction," Construction Management and Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 24(10), pages 1019-1028.
    6. Ximing Ruan & Edward G. Ochieng & Andrew D.F. Price & Charles O. Egbu, 2012. "Knowledge integration process in construction projects: a social network analysis approach to compare competitive and collaborative working," Construction Management and Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 30(1), pages 5-19, December.
    7. George Ofori, 2003. "Preparing Singapore's construction industry for the knowledge-based economy: practices, procedures and performance," Construction Management and Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 21(2), pages 113-125.
    8. Alexander Styhre, 2009. "Tacit knowledge in rock construction work: a study and a critique of the use of the term," Construction Management and Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 27(10), pages 995-1003.
    9. Ching-Hwang Wang & Chia-Chang Tsai & Yi-Yen Cheng, 2007. "Knowledge-based diagnosis model for PCM executing problems in public construction," Construction Management and Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 25(2), pages 129-142.
    10. Mario Fargnoli & Margherita De Minicis & Giulio Di Gravio, 2011. "Knowledge Management integration in Occupational Health and Safety systems in the construction industry," International Journal of Product Development, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 14(1/2/3/4), pages 165-185.
    11. Rita Yi Man Li & Sun Wah Poon, 2011. "Using Web 2.0 To Share Knowledge Of Construction Safety: The Fable Of Economic Animals," Economic Affairs, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 31(1), pages 73-79, March.
    12. Peihua Zhang & Fung Fai Ng, 2012. "Analysis of knowledge sharing behaviour in construction teams in Hong Kong," Construction Management and Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 30(7), pages 557-574, February.
    13. Taha, Mahmoud A. & Park, Sang C. & Russell, Jeffrey S., 1995. "Knowledge-based DSS for construction contractor prescreening," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 84(1), pages 35-46, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Munshi Muhammad Abdul Kader Jilani & Luo Fan & Mohammad Tazul Islam & Md. Aftab Uddin, 2020. "The Influence of Knowledge Sharing on Sustainable Performance: A Moderated Mediation Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(3), pages 1-18, January.
    2. José Giménez & Antonia Madrid-Guijarro & Antonio Duréndez, 2019. "Competitive Capabilities for the Innovation and Performance of Spanish Construction Companies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(19), pages 1-24, October.
    3. Zhen Chen & Zixin Tang, 2024. "The effect of caring ethical climate on employees’ knowledge-hiding behavior: evidence from Chinese construction firms," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 11(1), pages 1-13, December.
    4. Ahmad Morshedi & Navid Nezafati & Sajjad Shokouhyar, 2024. "Motivational Factors Affecting Knowledge Sharing in Steel Industry Supply Chain: A Mixed Qualitative-Quantitative Method Analysis," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 15(2), pages 6273-6311, June.
    5. Francesca Iandolo & Francesca Loia & Irene Fulco & Chiara Nespoli & Francesco Caputo, 2021. "Combining Big Data and Artificial Intelligence for Managing Collective Knowledge in Unpredictable Environment—Insights from the Chinese Case in Facing COVID-19," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 12(4), pages 1982-1996, December.
    6. Oleg Sukharev, 2021. "Measuring the Contribution of the “Knowledge Economy” to the Economic Growth Rate: Comparative Analysis," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 12(4), pages 1809-1829, December.
    7. Oleg Sergeevich Sukharev, 2023. "Intellectual Firm: Key Features and Development Models," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 14(2), pages 1091-1119, June.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Saeid Alaei & Seyed Hossein Razavi Hajiagha & Hannan Amoozad Mahdiraji & Jose Arturo Garza-Reyes, 2023. "Unveiling the role of sustainable supply chain drivers toward knowledge-based economy via a novel permutation approach: implications from an emerging economy," Operations Management Research, Springer, vol. 16(3), pages 1231-1250, September.
    2. Pawan Budhwar & Yaw Debrah, 2009. "Future research on human resource management systems in Asia," Asia Pacific Journal of Management, Springer, vol. 26(2), pages 197-218, June.
    3. Justyna Patalas-Maliszewska & S³awomir K³os, 2012. "Assessing The Use Of Knowledge Management Tools In A Sme Based On The Real Case Study," Polish Journal of Management Studies, Czestochowa Technical University, Department of Management, vol. 6(1), pages 206-214, December.
    4. Felipe Araya & Katherine Olivari & Luis A. Salazar & Omar Sánchez & Leonardo Sierra-Varela & Briguitte Neculman, 2024. "Impact of COVID-19 Pandemic on Construction Professionals’ Skills: A Case Study of Chile," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(17), pages 1-23, September.
    5. Rita Yi Man Li & Beiqi Tang & Kwong Wing Chau, 2019. "Sustainable Construction Safety Knowledge Sharing: A Partial Least Square-Structural Equation Modeling and A Feedforward Neural Network Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(20), pages 1-18, October.
    6. Aksel Ersoy, 2016. "Impact of Accessibility and Knowledge Creation on Local and Regional Development in Turkey," Growth and Change, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 47(4), pages 648-663, December.
    7. Muhammad Zafar Yaqub & Abdullah Alsabban, 2023. "Knowledge Sharing through Social Media Platforms in the Silicon Age," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(8), pages 1-19, April.
    8. Wing Hong LAU & Dr. Fleming WOO, 2015. "Application of Information and Communication Technology in the Architecture, Engineering and Construction (AEC) Industry in Hong Kong: A real case scenario," Journal of Business & Management (COES&RJ-JBM), , vol. 3(1), pages 324-334, January.
    9. Li, Mei & Yang, Jay, 2014. "Critical factors for waste management in office building retrofit projects in Australia," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 93(C), pages 85-98.
    10. Liyun Zeng & Rita Yi Man Li & Xuankai Huang, 2021. "Sustainable Mountain-Based Health and Wellness Tourist Destinations: The Interrelationships between Tourists’ Satisfaction, Behavioral Intentions, and Competitiveness," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(23), pages 1-20, December.
    11. Graeme Larsen & Tabarak Ballal, 2005. "The diffusion of innovations within a UKCI context: an explanatory framework," Construction Management and Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 23(1), pages 81-91.
    12. Loebbecke, Claudia & Huyskens, Claudio, 2009. "Development of a model-based netsourcing decision support system using a five-stage methodology," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 195(3), pages 653-661, June.
    13. Satu Reijonen & Rebecca Pinheiro-Croisel, 2012. "The dynamics of innovation influents: contracts and sustainable energy innovation uptake," Post-Print halshs-00743386, HAL.
    14. Seyit Ali Erdogan & Jonas Šaparauskas & Zenonas Turskis, 2019. "A Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Model to Choose the Best Option for Sustainable Construction Management," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(8), pages 1-19, April.
    15. Chen, Xiaoyan & Locatelli, Giorgio & Zhang, Xinyue & Gong, Yunhao & He, Qinghua, 2022. "Firm and project innovation outcome measures in infrastructure megaprojects: An interpretive structural modelling approach," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 109(C).
    16. Fauré, Bertrand & Rouleau, Linda, 2011. "The strategic competence of accountants and middle managers in budget making," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 36(3), pages 167-182, April.
    17. Ahmad Morshedi & Navid Nezafati & Sajjad Shokouhyar, 2024. "Motivational Factors Affecting Knowledge Sharing in Steel Industry Supply Chain: A Mixed Qualitative-Quantitative Method Analysis," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 15(2), pages 6273-6311, June.
    18. Davide Gattamelata & Mario Fargnoli, 2022. "Development of a New Procedure for Evaluating Working Postures: An Application in a Manufacturing Company," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(22), pages 1-20, November.
    19. Mario Fargnoli & Mara Lombardi & Nicolas Haber & Daniele Puri, 2018. "The Impact of Human Error in the Use of Agricultural Tractors: A Case Study Research in Vineyard Cultivation in Italy," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 8(6), pages 1-21, June.
    20. Jinfan Zhang & Yun Chen & Da Wang & Yinghui Zhang, 2023. "Learning in MTS of Construction Megaproject: A Conceptual Framework," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(5), pages 1-14, February.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:jknowl:v:9:y:2018:i:3:d:10.1007_s13132-016-0375-7. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.