Author
Abstract
This paper intends to assess the drivers of knowledge creation in emerging countries. Specifically, the study empirically investigates the long-run impact of financial development, research and development (R&D) activities and the protection of intellectual property rights on knowledge production in China using the ARDL bounds testing approach during the 1979–2018 period. The study also assesses the impact of financial development on knowledge production via its interaction with financial regulations, trade openness and human capital. We measure knowledge capital stock and R&D capital stock using the perpetual inventory flow method assuming different rates of depreciation, while the financial development is measured by conducting the principal component analysis (PCA) of three key banking sector indicators including credit to the private sector to GDP ratio, the ratio of the liquid liabilities to GDP and the sum of commercial bank and central bank assets. Results show that financial development, R&D activities and patent protections are important determinants of knowledge creation in China. Further, estimates reveal that improvements to financial regulations, increased freedom to trade and the level of tertiary education moderate the effect of financial development on knowledge production. The results are robust to several control variables such as the macroeconomic environment of the economy, trade openness, foreign direct investment and knowledge accumulation in the rest of the world. The findings of the paper suggest that the steps taken to develop the financial sector and accelerate R&D activities may contribute to the accumulation of new ideas and stock of knowledge in emerging countries. Furthermore, the study emphasizes prudent financial regulations, trade freedom and improved access to tertiary education to enhance the effect of financial development on knowledge production.
Suggested Citation
Abdul Jalil & Abdul Rauf & Li Han, 2024.
"Financial Development, R&D and Knowledge Production: Empirical Evidence from China,"
Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 15(3), pages 14617-14642, September.
Handle:
RePEc:spr:jknowl:v:15:y:2024:i:3:d:10.1007_s13132-023-01675-1
DOI: 10.1007/s13132-023-01675-1
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:jknowl:v:15:y:2024:i:3:d:10.1007_s13132-023-01675-1. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.