IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/jknowl/v15y2024i3d10.1007_s13132-023-01610-4.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The High-tech Enterprise Certification Policy and Innovation: Quantity or Quality?

Author

Listed:
  • Zhenzhen Chen

    (China Three Gorges University)

  • Yu He

    (China Three Gorges University)

  • Yum K. Kwan

    (City University of Hong Kong)

Abstract

The debate on industrial policy is a hot issue in both academic studies and policy practices. Empirical evidence on the relationship between the high-tech enterprise certification policy and innovation is mixed, with focus on innovation quantity and neglecting innovation quality or green innovation. This study draws insights from government support theory to estimate the effects of certification on the quantity and quality of inventions and green inventions. By using China’s listed firms from 2008 to 2017 through the panel fixed effects model, this study confirms the negative effects of certification on the quantity and quality of inventions and green inventions. Compared with non-high-tech firms, high-tech firms have higher green invention quantity in the fourth year before certification, higher quantity and quality of inventions in the third certification, and higher innovation quantity and quality in the next five years after the end of the tax incentive period. Moreover, financing constraints and R&D investment have masking effects, and the negative effects of certification on innovation quantity and quality are weaker if high-tech firms have higher information transparency or cash flow volatility. Furthermore, there are heterogeneous effects of certification on innovation in terms of certification policies, ownership, and firm age. This study raises concerns about policy failure and corporate rent seeking by elaborating that certification does not increase innovation quantity and quantity before and during the tax incentives period. This study also presents fresh insights into the dynamics of certification influences and some policy implications.

Suggested Citation

  • Zhenzhen Chen & Yu He & Yum K. Kwan, 2024. "The High-tech Enterprise Certification Policy and Innovation: Quantity or Quality?," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 15(3), pages 14135-14171, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:jknowl:v:15:y:2024:i:3:d:10.1007_s13132-023-01610-4
    DOI: 10.1007/s13132-023-01610-4
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s13132-023-01610-4
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s13132-023-01610-4?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Nicholas Bloom & John Van Reenen & Heidi Williams, 2019. "A toolkit of policies to promote innovation," Voprosy Ekonomiki, NP Voprosy Ekonomiki, issue 10.
    2. François Derrien & Ambrus Kecskés, 2013. "The Real Effects of Financial Shocks: Evidence from Exogenous Changes in Analyst Coverage," Post-Print hal-00852356, HAL.
    3. Laszlo Balazsi & Laszlo Matyas & Tom Wansbeek, 2018. "The estimation of multidimensional fixed effects panel data models," Econometric Reviews, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 37(3), pages 212-227, March.
    4. Sihai Li & Xianzhong Song & Huiying Wu, 2015. "Political Connection, Ownership Structure, and Corporate Philanthropy in China: A Strategic-Political Perspective," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 129(2), pages 399-411, June.
    5. Dirk Meissner & Sandrine Kergroach, 2021. "Innovation policy mix: mapping and measurement," The Journal of Technology Transfer, Springer, vol. 46(1), pages 197-222, February.
    6. Aoran Wang, 2020. "Professors on boards and corporate innovation in China," Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 52(41), pages 4474-4498, September.
    7. Jin, Peizhen & Mangla, Sachin Kumar & Song, Malin, 2022. "The power of innovation diffusion: How patent transfer affects urban innovation quality," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 145(C), pages 414-425.
    8. Daron Acemoglu & Ufuk Akcigit & Harun Alp & Nicholas Bloom & William Kerr, 2018. "Innovation, Reallocation, and Growth," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 108(11), pages 3450-3491, November.
    9. Hu, Albert G.Z. & Zhang, Peng & Zhao, Lijing, 2017. "China as number one? Evidence from China's most recent patenting surge," Journal of Development Economics, Elsevier, vol. 124(C), pages 107-119.
    10. Dai, Xiaoyong & Wang, Fang, 2019. "Does the high- and new-technology enterprise program promote innovative performance? Evidence from Chinese firms," China Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 57(C).
    11. Tian, Binbin & Lin, Chao & Zhang, Wenwen & Feng, Chen, 2022. "Tax Incentives, On-the-job Training, and Human Capital Accumulation: Evidence from China," China Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 75(C).
    12. Sabrina T. Howell, 2017. "Financing Innovation: Evidence from R&D Grants," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 107(4), pages 1136-1164, April.
    13. Ha‐Joon Chang & Antonio Andreoni, 2020. "Industrial Policy in the 21st Century," Development and Change, International Institute of Social Studies, vol. 51(2), pages 324-351, March.
    14. Xiang, Xiaojian & Liu, Chuanjiang & Yang, Mian, 2022. "Who is financing corporate green innovation?," International Review of Economics & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 78(C), pages 321-337.
    15. Jose Manuel Campa & Simi Kedia, 2002. "Explaining the Diversification Discount," Journal of Finance, American Finance Association, vol. 57(4), pages 1731-1762, August.
    16. Yiling Chen & Guanju Chen, 2022. "Effectiveness of industrial policy in supporting innovation: the role of internal and external corporate governance mechanism," Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 54(19), pages 2181-2193, April.
    17. Cheng, Yuanyuan & Du, Kerui & Yao, Xin, 2023. "Stringent environmental regulation and inconsistent green innovation behavior: Evidence from air pollution prevention and control action plan in China," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 120(C).
    18. Eva Paus & Michael Robinson & Fiona Tregenna, 2022. "Firm innovation in Africa and Latin America: Heterogeneity and country context [Technological and non-technological innovation and productivity in services vis a vis manufacturing in Uruguay]," Industrial and Corporate Change, Oxford University Press and the Associazione ICC, vol. 31(2), pages 338-357.
    19. Dirk Meissner & Sandrine Kergroach, 2021. "Correction to: Innovation policy mix: mapping and measurement," The Journal of Technology Transfer, Springer, vol. 46(5), pages 1705-1705, October.
    20. Yu, Liping & Li, Huiyang & Wang, Zuogong & Duan, Yunlong, 2019. "Technology imports and self-innovation in the context of innovation quality," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 214(C), pages 44-52.
    21. Faccio, Mara & Marchica, Maria-Teresa & Mura, Roberto, 2016. "CEO gender, corporate risk-taking, and the efficiency of capital allocation," Journal of Corporate Finance, Elsevier, vol. 39(C), pages 193-209.
    22. Howard Pack & Kamal Saggi, 2006. "Is There a Case for Industrial Policy? A Critical Survey," The World Bank Research Observer, World Bank, vol. 21(2), pages 267-297.
    23. Todd A. Gormley & David A. Matsa, 2014. "Common Errors: How to (and Not to) Control for Unobserved Heterogeneity," The Review of Financial Studies, Society for Financial Studies, vol. 27(2), pages 617-661.
    24. Fang, Hongsheng & Wu, Xiao & Shen, Jim Huangnan & Zhao, Lexin, 2022. "The impact of technology identification policy on firm innovation: Evidence from China," China Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 76(C).
    25. Beladi, Hamid & Deng, Jie & Hu, May, 2021. "Cash flow uncertainty, financial constraints and R&D investment," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 76(C).
    26. Sheikh, Shahbaz, 2022. "CEO power and the likelihood of paying dividends: Effect of profitability and cash flow volatility," Journal of Corporate Finance, Elsevier, vol. 73(C).
    27. Hsiang-Lin Cheng & C.-M. J. Yu, 2012. "Adoption of Practices by Subsidiaries and Institutional Interaction within Internationalised Small- and Medium-Sized Enterprises," Management International Review, Springer, vol. 52(1), pages 81-105, February.
    28. Bai, Min & Li, Shihe & Lien, Donald & Yu, Chia-Feng (Jeffrey), 2022. "The winner's curse in high-tech enterprise certification: Evidence from stock price crash risk," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 82(C).
    29. Charles J. Hadlock & Joshua R. Pierce, 2010. "New Evidence on Measuring Financial Constraints: Moving Beyond the KZ Index," The Review of Financial Studies, Society for Financial Studies, vol. 23(5), pages 1909-1940.
    30. Benlu Hai & Ximing Yin & Jie Xiong & Jin Chen, 2022. "Could more innovation output bring better financial performance? The role of financial constraints," Financial Innovation, Springer;Southwestern University of Finance and Economics, vol. 8(1), pages 1-26, December.
    31. Chen, Zhibin & Xu, Yibin & Tian, Zongtao & Meng, Xu, 2022. "The Impact of Social Insurance Law on Corporate Innovation: Evidence from a quasi-natural experiment," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 111(C).
    32. François Derrien & Ambrus Kecskés, 2013. "The Real Effects of Financial Shocks: Evidence from Exogenous Changes in Analyst Coverage," Journal of Finance, American Finance Association, vol. 68(4), pages 1407-1440, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Chan, Konan & Guo, Re-Jin J. & Wang, Yanzhi A. & Yang, Hsiao-Lin, 2022. "Organization capital and analyst coverage," Journal of Empirical Finance, Elsevier, vol. 69(C), pages 81-105.
    2. Xu, Lingling & Zhong, Huijie, 2024. "Identification of high- and new-technology enterprises, supplier relationship and technological innovation: Evidence from China," International Review of Economics & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 94(C).
    3. Bennett, Benjamin & Stulz, René & Wang, Zexi, 2020. "Does the stock market make firms more productive?," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 136(2), pages 281-306.
    4. Santos, Anabela M. & Coad, Alex, 2023. "Monitoring and evaluation of transformative innovation policy: Suggestions for Improvement," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 90(C).
    5. Shao, Yanmin & Xu, Kunliang & Shan, Yuan George, 2024. "Leveraging corporate digitalization for green technology innovation: The mediating role of resource endowments," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 133(C).
    6. Chen, Tao & Harford, Jarrad & Lin, Chen, 2015. "Do analysts matter for governance? Evidence from natural experiments," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 115(2), pages 383-410.
    7. Luong, Thanh Son & Qiu, Buhui & Wu, Yi (Ava), 2021. "Does it pay to be socially connected with wall street brokerages? Evidence from cost of equity," Journal of Corporate Finance, Elsevier, vol. 68(C).
    8. Qiao, Lu & Fei, Junjun, 2022. "Government subsidies, enterprise operating efficiency, and “stiff but deathless” zombie firms," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 107(C).
    9. Chen, Yongmin & Jiang, Haiwei & Liang, Yousha & Pan, Shiyuan, 2022. "The impact of foreign direct investment on innovation: Evidence from patent filings and citations in China," Journal of Comparative Economics, Elsevier, vol. 50(4), pages 917-945.
    10. Zijian Cheng & Zhangxin (Frank) Liu & Yupu Sun, 2021. "Share pledging and financial constraints in China," Accounting and Finance, Accounting and Finance Association of Australia and New Zealand, vol. 61(3), pages 4147-4189, September.
    11. Jin, Ming & Chen, Fanglin & Chen, Zhongfei, 2023. "Cultural barriers in China's corporate loans," Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, Elsevier, vol. 79(C).
    12. Zhong, Huaming & Al-Duais, Zinb Abduljabbar Mohamed & Peng, Biyu, 2023. "The impact of idiosyncratic risk on corporate financialisation——Evidence from China," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 86(C).
    13. To, Thomas Y. & Navone, Marco & Wu, Eliza, 2018. "Analyst coverage and the quality of corporate investment decisions," Journal of Corporate Finance, Elsevier, vol. 51(C), pages 164-181.
    14. Edmans, Alex & Jayaraman, Sudarshan & Schneemeier, Jan, 2017. "The source of information in prices and investment-price sensitivity," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 126(1), pages 74-96.
    15. Hegde, Shantaram P. & Mishra, Dev R., 2019. "Married CEOs and corporate social responsibility," Journal of Corporate Finance, Elsevier, vol. 58(C), pages 226-246.
    16. Xede, James & Simon Peter Dak-Adzaklo, Cephas & Ofosu, Emmanuel & Wise Dodzidenu Adza, Solomon, 2023. "Competition laws, external financing and investment," Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions and Money, Elsevier, vol. 82(C).
    17. Xie, Lingmin & Chen, Zhian & Li, Donghui & Tan, Hongping, 2022. "Foreign analysts and managerial investment learning from stock markets," Journal of Multinational Financial Management, Elsevier, vol. 64(C).
    18. Qin, Yaohua & Xiao, He & Zhang, Yifei, 2019. "Market-based Financing Reforms and Shareholder Valuations: Event Study Evidence from the Chinese Science and Technology Innovation Board," MPRA Paper 94046, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    19. Xu, Zhaoxia, 2020. "Economic policy uncertainty, cost of capital, and corporate innovation," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 111(C).
    20. Jin Kyung Choi & Rebecca N. Hann & Musa Subasi & Yue Zheng, 2020. "An Empirical Analysis of Analysts' Capital Expenditure Forecasts: Evidence from Corporate Investment Efficiency," Contemporary Accounting Research, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 37(4), pages 2615-2648, December.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    High-tech enterprise certification policy; Inventions; Green inventions; Government support;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • H11 - Public Economics - - Structure and Scope of Government - - - Structure and Scope of Government
    • H25 - Public Economics - - Taxation, Subsidies, and Revenue - - - Business Taxes and Subsidies
    • O31 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Innovation; Research and Development; Technological Change; Intellectual Property Rights - - - Innovation and Invention: Processes and Incentives
    • O38 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Innovation; Research and Development; Technological Change; Intellectual Property Rights - - - Government Policy

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:jknowl:v:15:y:2024:i:3:d:10.1007_s13132-023-01610-4. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.