IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/chieco/v88y2024ics1043951x24001779.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

R&D project subsidy V.S. government innovation reward: The effectiveness on corporate innovation

Author

Listed:
  • Li, Yafei
  • Dong, Xiaoqi
  • Sun, Jinping

Abstract

This paper compares the effectiveness of R&D project subsidies and government innovation rewards. Using a dataset of China's listed companies from 2008 to 2019, we investigate the associations of these two innovation grants with corporate innovation. The results indicate that both R&D project subsidy and government innovation reward can increase corporate innovation output. However, only government innovation reward can encourage private R&D investment. In addition, R&D project subsidy serves as an incentive role through the governance and financing mechanisms, whereas the government innovation reward has only a governance mechanism. Furthermore, the R&D project subsidy has a relatively poor impact on large firms and state-owned enterprises (SOEs), whereas the government innovation reward can still motivate their innovation. This study contributes to the expanding body of literature by providing diverse evidence of innovation grants from the perspective of the government subsidizing stage.

Suggested Citation

  • Li, Yafei & Dong, Xiaoqi & Sun, Jinping, 2024. "R&D project subsidy V.S. government innovation reward: The effectiveness on corporate innovation," China Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 88(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:chieco:v:88:y:2024:i:c:s1043951x24001779
    DOI: 10.1016/j.chieco.2024.102288
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1043951X24001779
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.chieco.2024.102288?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    R&D project subsidy; Government innovation reward; Corporate innovation; Crowd-out effect; Substantive innovation;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • G31 - Financial Economics - - Corporate Finance and Governance - - - Capital Budgeting; Fixed Investment and Inventory Studies
    • G32 - Financial Economics - - Corporate Finance and Governance - - - Financing Policy; Financial Risk and Risk Management; Capital and Ownership Structure; Value of Firms; Goodwill
    • G38 - Financial Economics - - Corporate Finance and Governance - - - Government Policy and Regulation
    • H2 - Public Economics - - Taxation, Subsidies, and Revenue
    • O3 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Innovation; Research and Development; Technological Change; Intellectual Property Rights

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:chieco:v:88:y:2024:i:c:s1043951x24001779. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/chieco .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.