IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/jglont/v7y2017i1d10.1186_s40497-017-0082-2.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Analysis of the ASEAN Banking Integration Framework: the Philippines as a looking glass for consumer preference

Author

Listed:
  • Francis Lawrence B. De Jesus

    (University of Santo Tomas, The Graduate School, Office for Graduate School Research)

  • Enrico Aurelio Torres

    (University of Santo Tomas, The Graduate School, Office for Graduate School Research)

Abstract

ASEAN, a region currently undergoing an ambitious integration initiative proposed a unified regional banking system thru the Qualified ASEAN Banks. This brings forth an array of competitive banking alternatives who are now capable of entering new economies within the ASEAN region. Would a local banking customer choose to adhere to the offers of these cross border alternatives or would they stick to their local home-grown banks? With banks from different members of the ASEAN Region as subjects and the local population of the Philippines as respondents, the study yielded the following results; Upon the full implementation of the ASEAN Banking Integration Framework up to 58.25% of the local market would diversify their savings resources between local banks and qualified ASEAN Banks, 77.50% would prioritize Qualified ASEAN Banks for their loans and financing requirements. This brings forth an important contemplation on how local and ASEAN banks should prepare for the full effects of this integration initiative.

Suggested Citation

  • Francis Lawrence B. De Jesus & Enrico Aurelio Torres, 2017. "Analysis of the ASEAN Banking Integration Framework: the Philippines as a looking glass for consumer preference," Journal of Global Entrepreneurship Research, Springer;UNESCO Chair in Entrepreneurship, vol. 7(1), pages 1-16, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:jglont:v:7:y:2017:i:1:d:10.1186_s40497-017-0082-2
    DOI: 10.1186/s40497-017-0082-2
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1186/s40497-017-0082-2
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1186/s40497-017-0082-2?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Chen, Jiawei & Song, Kejun, 2013. "Two-sided matching in the loan market," International Journal of Industrial Organization, Elsevier, vol. 31(2), pages 145-152.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ben R. Craig & Yiming Ma, 2020. "Intermediation in the Interbank Lending Market," Working Papers 20-09, Federal Reserve Bank of Cleveland.
    2. Yin, Desheng & Hasan, Iftekhar & Liu, Liuling & Wang, Haizhi, 2022. "Trust and contracting with foreign banks: Evidence from China," Journal of Asian Economics, Elsevier, vol. 83(C).
    3. Suguru Otani, 2021. "Estimating Endogenous Coalitional Mergers: Merger Costs and Assortativeness of Size and Specialization," Papers 2108.12744, arXiv.org, revised Mar 2023.
    4. Park, Minjung, 2013. "Understanding merger incentives and outcomes in the US mutual fund industry," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 37(11), pages 4368-4380.
    5. Kolev, Atanas & Maurin, Laurent & Ségol, Matthieu, 2019. "What firms don't like about bank loans: New evidence from survey data," EIB Working Papers 2019/07, European Investment Bank (EIB).
    6. Suguru Otani & Takuma Matsuda, 2023. "Unified Merger List in the Container Shipping Industry from 1966 to 2022: A Structural Estimation of M&A Matching," Papers 2310.09938, arXiv.org, revised Dec 2024.
    7. Jian Ni & Kannan Srinivasan, 2015. "Matching in the Sourcing Market: A Structural Analysis of the Upstream Channel," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 34(5), pages 722-738, September.
    8. Grzegorz Haᴌaj & Christoffer Kok, 2015. "Modelling the emergence of the interbank networks," Quantitative Finance, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 15(4), pages 653-671, April.
    9. Wang, Zhihong & Li, Yangyang & Gu, Fu & Guo, Jianfeng & Wu, Xiaojun, 2020. "Two-sided matching and strategic selection on freight resource sharing platforms," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 559(C).
    10. Kosenko, Konstantin & Michelson, Noam, 2022. "It takes more than two to tango: Multiple bank lending, asset commonality and risk," Journal of Financial Stability, Elsevier, vol. 61(C).
    11. Andreas Haufler & Bernhard Kassner, 2024. "Matching for Risk-Taking: Overconfident Bankers and Government-Protected Banks," CESifo Working Paper Series 11336, CESifo.
    12. Ashish Arora & Michelle Gittelman & Sarah Kaplan & John Lynch & Will Mitchell & Nicolaj Siggelkow & Denisa Mindruta & Mahka Moeen & Rajshree Agarwal, 2016. "A two-sided matching approach for partner selection and assessing complementarities in partners' attributes in inter-firm alliances," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 37(1), pages 206-231, January.
    13. Taehoon Kim & Jacob Schwartz & Kyungchul Song & Yoon-Jae Whang, 2019. "Monte Carlo Inference on Two-Sided Matching Models," Econometrics, MDPI, vol. 7(1), pages 1-15, March.
    14. Olivier Darmouni, 2020. "Informational Frictions and the Credit Crunch," Journal of Finance, American Finance Association, vol. 75(4), pages 2055-2094, August.
    15. Konstantin Kosenko & Noam Michelson, 2018. "It Takes More than Two to Tango: Understanding the Dynamics behind Multiple Bank Lending and its Implications," Bank of Israel Working Papers 2018.11, Bank of Israel.
    16. Yumeng Miao & Rong Du & Jin Li & J. Christopher Westland, 2019. "A two-sided matching model in the context of B2B export cross-border e-commerce," Electronic Commerce Research, Springer, vol. 19(4), pages 841-861, December.
    17. Oktay Akkus & J. Anthony Cookson & Ali Hortaçsu, 2016. "The Determinants of Bank Mergers: A Revealed Preference Analysis," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 62(8), pages 2241-2258, August.
    18. Nosal, K.;, 2017. "Two-Sided Matching in Physician-Insurer Networks: Evidence from Medicare Advantage," Health, Econometrics and Data Group (HEDG) Working Papers 17/19, HEDG, c/o Department of Economics, University of York.
    19. Yihui Pan, 2017. "The Determinants and Impact of Executive-Firm Matches," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 63(1), pages 185-200, January.
    20. Craig, Ben & Ma, Yiming, 2022. "Intermediation in the interbank lending market," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 145(2), pages 179-207.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:jglont:v:7:y:2017:i:1:d:10.1186_s40497-017-0082-2. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.