Author
Abstract
Fostering sustainable human-wildlife coexistence involves managing a more-than-human social process of complex interactions among people and wildlife. Developing effective coexistence strategies requires a thorough understanding of contextual intricacies inherent in these challenges. This paper goes beyond acknowledging the context-specific nature of coexistence challenges to emphasize that context itself is partly made by human thoughts and actions. Conservationists can consciously adopt an attention frame that enables them to navigate contexts in a manageable way, avoiding the dual pitfalls of oversimplification and overcomplication. Using the policy sciences approach, we introduce a social process framework designed to facilitate the analysis of complex contexts in coexistence challenges. It addresses both content (what should be included in the context) and procedure (how to analyze the context). At its core, this framework provides a functional understanding of five interactive elements: people seeking values through institutions using resources affecting wildlife. To “map” context is to comprehend how participants, consciously or unconsciously guided by their perspectives, engage in specific situations, employing their base values through various strategies to pursue desired outcomes from decision-making. Decision outcomes, in turn, have long-term effects on wildlife, resources, people, values, and institutions. We expound upon these categories and provide a set of guiding questions to facilitate empirical investigations into specific coexistence challenges in a problem-oriented, reflexive manner. This framework is a valuable tool to gain practical insights into coexistence challenges through conscious and systematic attention to key contextual variables, thereby contributing to enhancing the effectiveness of coexistence efforts.
Suggested Citation
Yufang Gao & Susan G. Clark, 2024.
"A practical guide to understanding the context of human-wildlife coexistence,"
Journal of Environmental Studies and Sciences, Springer;Association of Environmental Studies and Sciences, vol. 14(4), pages 720-731, December.
Handle:
RePEc:spr:jenvss:v:14:y:2024:i:4:d:10.1007_s13412-024-00894-5
DOI: 10.1007/s13412-024-00894-5
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:jenvss:v:14:y:2024:i:4:d:10.1007_s13412-024-00894-5. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.