IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/jenvss/v14y2024i4d10.1007_s13412-024-00894-5.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A practical guide to understanding the context of human-wildlife coexistence

Author

Listed:
  • Yufang Gao

    (Yale University
    Yale University)

  • Susan G. Clark

    (Yale University)

Abstract

Fostering sustainable human-wildlife coexistence involves managing a more-than-human social process of complex interactions among people and wildlife. Developing effective coexistence strategies requires a thorough understanding of contextual intricacies inherent in these challenges. This paper goes beyond acknowledging the context-specific nature of coexistence challenges to emphasize that context itself is partly made by human thoughts and actions. Conservationists can consciously adopt an attention frame that enables them to navigate contexts in a manageable way, avoiding the dual pitfalls of oversimplification and overcomplication. Using the policy sciences approach, we introduce a social process framework designed to facilitate the analysis of complex contexts in coexistence challenges. It addresses both content (what should be included in the context) and procedure (how to analyze the context). At its core, this framework provides a functional understanding of five interactive elements: people seeking values through institutions using resources affecting wildlife. To “map” context is to comprehend how participants, consciously or unconsciously guided by their perspectives, engage in specific situations, employing their base values through various strategies to pursue desired outcomes from decision-making. Decision outcomes, in turn, have long-term effects on wildlife, resources, people, values, and institutions. We expound upon these categories and provide a set of guiding questions to facilitate empirical investigations into specific coexistence challenges in a problem-oriented, reflexive manner. This framework is a valuable tool to gain practical insights into coexistence challenges through conscious and systematic attention to key contextual variables, thereby contributing to enhancing the effectiveness of coexistence efforts.

Suggested Citation

  • Yufang Gao & Susan G. Clark, 2024. "A practical guide to understanding the context of human-wildlife coexistence," Journal of Environmental Studies and Sciences, Springer;Association of Environmental Studies and Sciences, vol. 14(4), pages 720-731, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:jenvss:v:14:y:2024:i:4:d:10.1007_s13412-024-00894-5
    DOI: 10.1007/s13412-024-00894-5
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s13412-024-00894-5
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s13412-024-00894-5?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Susan Clark & Richard Wallace, 2015. "Integration and interdisciplinarity: concepts, frameworks, and education," Policy Sciences, Springer;Society of Policy Sciences, vol. 48(2), pages 233-255, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Richard L. Wallace & Susan G. Clark, 2018. "Environmental studies and sciences in a time of chaos: problems, contexts, and recommendations," Journal of Environmental Studies and Sciences, Springer;Association of Environmental Studies and Sciences, vol. 8(1), pages 110-113, March.
    2. Kate Maxwell & Paul Benneworth, 2018. "The construction of new scientific norms for solving Grand Challenges," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 4(1), pages 1-11, December.
    3. Richard L. Wallace & Jess Greenburg & Susan G. Clark, 2020. "Confronting anxiety and despair in environmental studies and sciences: an analysis and guide for students and faculty," Journal of Environmental Studies and Sciences, Springer;Association of Environmental Studies and Sciences, vol. 10(2), pages 148-155, June.
    4. Emily A. Royse & Amanda D. Manzanares & Heqiao Wang & Kevin C. Haudek & Caterina Belle Azzarello & Lydia R. Horne & Daniel L. Druckenbrod & Megan Shiroda & Sol R. Adams & Ennea Fairchild & Shirley Vin, 2024. "FEW questions, many answers: using machine learning to assess how students connect food–energy–water (FEW) concepts," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 11(1), pages 1-18, December.
    5. Glenn Dale & Gabriela Dotro & Puneet Srivastava & David Austin & Stacy Hutchinson & Peter Head & Ashantha Goonetilleke & Alexandros Stefanakis & Ranka Junge & José A. Fernández L. & Vanessa Weyer & Wa, 2021. "Education in Ecological Engineering—a Need Whose Time Has Come," Circular Economy and Sustainability, Springer, vol. 1(1), pages 333-373, June.
    6. James Proctor & Jennifer Bernstein & Richard Wallace, 2015. "Introduction: unsettling the ESS curriculum," Journal of Environmental Studies and Sciences, Springer;Association of Environmental Studies and Sciences, vol. 5(2), pages 195-199, June.
    7. Desmond Ng & Kerry Litzenberg, 2019. "Overcoming disciplinary divides in higher education: the case of agricultural economics," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 5(1), pages 1-7, December.
    8. Emond, Tina & Guillaumie, Laurence & de Montigny, Francine, 2021. "Using a logic model to develop an intervention for improving miscarriage care in the emergency department," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 85(C).
    9. Peter Linquiti, 2024. "Operationalizing Lasswell’s call for clarification of value goals: an equity-based approach to normative public policy analysis," Policy Sciences, Springer;Society of Policy Sciences, vol. 57(1), pages 193-219, March.
    10. Cottafava, Dario & Ascione, Grazia Sveva & Corazza, Laura & Dhir, Amandeep, 2022. "Sustainable development goals research in higher education institutions: An interdisciplinarity assessment through an entropy-based indicator," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 151(C), pages 138-155.
    11. Teresa Lloro-Bidart & Michael H. Finewood, 2018. "Intersectional feminism for the environmental studies and sciences: looking inward and outward," Journal of Environmental Studies and Sciences, Springer;Association of Environmental Studies and Sciences, vol. 8(2), pages 142-151, June.
    12. Zachary Bischoff-Mattson & Amanda H. Lynch, 2016. "Adaptive governance in water reform discourses of the Murray–Darling Basin, Australia," Policy Sciences, Springer;Society of Policy Sciences, vol. 49(3), pages 281-307, September.
    13. Cynthia A. Wei & Michael L. Deaton & Teresa J. Shume & Ramiro Berardo & William R. Burnside, 2020. "A framework for teaching socio-environmental problem-solving," Journal of Environmental Studies and Sciences, Springer;Association of Environmental Studies and Sciences, vol. 10(4), pages 467-477, December.
    14. Matthew R. Auer, 2017. "Rescuing the decision process," Policy Sciences, Springer;Society of Policy Sciences, vol. 50(4), pages 519-526, December.
    15. Ahmed Sabab Sharek & Kalim U. Shah, 2021. "Tracking the quality of scientific knowledge inputs in reports generated by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC)," Journal of Environmental Studies and Sciences, Springer;Association of Environmental Studies and Sciences, vol. 11(4), pages 586-594, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:jenvss:v:14:y:2024:i:4:d:10.1007_s13412-024-00894-5. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.