IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/jcsosc/v7y2024i3d10.1007_s42001-024-00324-0.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Impact of arbitrage trading between an ETF and its underlying assets on market liquidity of their markets using an agent-based simulation

Author

Listed:
  • Xin Guan

    (Kogakuin University Graduate School)

  • Takanobu Mizuta

    (SPARX Asset Management Co. Ltd.)

  • Isao Yagi

    (Kogakuin University)

Abstract

Exchange-traded funds (ETFs) are mutual funds that invest in a diversified portfolio of many financial assets. They are listed on stock exchanges and traded as financial instruments. As some ETFs are exchangeable with all the underlying assets held by the ETFs, when the ETF’s price and the total value of the underlying assets held by the ETF differ, some investors buy the cheaper one and sell the more expensive one to make a profit from the price difference (i.e., arbitrage trading). In this study, we constructed an artificial market consisting of two underlying assets and an ETF and then conducted simulations of arbitrage trading between the underlying asset markets and the ETF market, comparing scenarios with and without arbitrage trading. From the results, we evaluated the essential impact of arbitrage trading on the liquidity of each market from the perspective of representative liquidity indicators (Volume, Depth, and Tightness). In addition, we also checked how liquidity differs when the orders that are submitted are unevenly distributed across markets. The results revealed that there is a tendency for liquidity to differ between Volume, which is highly valued by financial practitioners, and other indicators (Depth and Tightness). Volume represents trading activity, whereas the other indicators represent the current condition of the market. Therefore, it is important for prospective traders to consider liquidity beyond Volume alone when making investment decisions.

Suggested Citation

  • Xin Guan & Takanobu Mizuta & Isao Yagi, 2024. "Impact of arbitrage trading between an ETF and its underlying assets on market liquidity of their markets using an agent-based simulation," Journal of Computational Social Science, Springer, vol. 7(3), pages 2839-2870, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:jcsosc:v:7:y:2024:i:3:d:10.1007_s42001-024-00324-0
    DOI: 10.1007/s42001-024-00324-0
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s42001-024-00324-0
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s42001-024-00324-0?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Iori, Giulia, 2002. "A microsimulation of traders activity in the stock market: the role of heterogeneity, agents' interactions and trade frictions," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 49(2), pages 269-285, October.
    2. Richard Roll & Eduardo Schwartz & Avanidhar Subrahmanyam, 2007. "Liquidity and the Law of One Price: The Case of the Futures‐Cash Basis," Journal of Finance, American Finance Association, vol. 62(5), pages 2201-2234, October.
    3. Harris, Lawrence E, 1994. "Minimum Price Variations, Discrete Bid-Ask Spreads, and Quotation Sizes," The Review of Financial Studies, Society for Financial Studies, vol. 7(1), pages 149-178.
    4. Marshall, Ben R. & Nguyen, Nhut H. & Visaltanachoti, Nuttawat, 2013. "ETF arbitrage: Intraday evidence," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 37(9), pages 3486-3498.
    5. Doron Israeli & Charles M. C. Lee & Suhas A. Sridharan, 2017. "Is there a dark side to exchange traded funds? An information perspective," Review of Accounting Studies, Springer, vol. 22(3), pages 1048-1083, September.
    6. Carrion, Allen, 2013. "Very fast money: High-frequency trading on the NASDAQ," Journal of Financial Markets, Elsevier, vol. 16(4), pages 680-711.
    7. Itzhak Ben‐David & Francesco Franzoni & Rabih Moussawi, 2018. "Do ETFs Increase Volatility?," Journal of Finance, American Finance Association, vol. 73(6), pages 2471-2535, December.
    8. Zhi Da & Sophie Shive, 2018. "Exchange traded funds and asset return correlations," European Financial Management, European Financial Management Association, vol. 24(1), pages 136-168, January.
    9. Box, Travis & Davis, Ryan & Evans, Richard & Lynch, Andrew, 2021. "Intraday arbitrage between ETFs and their underlying portfolios," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 141(3), pages 1078-1095.
    10. Timothy Krause & Sina Ehsani & Donald Lien, 2014. "Exchange-traded funds, liquidity and volatility," Applied Financial Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 24(24), pages 1617-1630, December.
    11. Karvik, Geir-Are & Noss, Joseph & Worlidge, Jack & Beale, Daniel, 2018. "The deeds of speed: an agent-based model of market liquidity and flash episodes," Bank of England working papers 743, Bank of England.
    12. Chiarella, Carl & Iori, Giulia, 2009. "The impact of heterogeneous trading rules on the limit order book and order flows," Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, Elsevier, vol. 33(3), pages 525-537.
    13. Isao Yagi & Yuji Masuda & Takanobu Mizuta, 2020. "Analysis of the Impact of High-Frequency Trading on Artificial Market Liquidity," Papers 2010.13038, arXiv.org.
    14. Kee H. Chung & Kenneth A. Kim & Pattanaporn Kitsabunnarat, 2005. "Liquidity And Quote Clustering In A Market With Multiple Tick Sizes," Journal of Financial Research, Southern Finance Association;Southwestern Finance Association, vol. 28(2), pages 177-195, June.
    15. Chiarella, Carl & He, Xue-Zhong, 2003. "Heterogeneous Beliefs, Risk, And Learning In A Simple Asset-Pricing Model With A Market Maker," Macroeconomic Dynamics, Cambridge University Press, vol. 7(4), pages 503-536, September.
    16. Chia-Hsuan Yeh & Chun-Yi Yang, 2013. "Do price limits hurt the market?," Journal of Economic Interaction and Coordination, Springer;Society for Economic Science with Heterogeneous Interacting Agents, vol. 8(1), pages 125-153, April.
    17. Pagano, Marco & Sánchez Serrano, Antonio & Zechner, Jozef, 2019. "Can ETFs contribute to systemic risk?," Report of the Advisory Scientific Committee 9, European Systemic Risk Board.
    18. R. Cont, 2001. "Empirical properties of asset returns: stylized facts and statistical issues," Quantitative Finance, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 1(2), pages 223-236.
    19. Mahiro Hoshino & Takanobu Mizuta & Yasuhiro Sudo & Isao Yagi, 2022. "Impact of maker-taker fees on stock exchange competition from an agent-based simulation," Journal of Computational Social Science, Springer, vol. 5(2), pages 1323-1342, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Isao Yagi & Yuji Masuda & Takanobu Mizuta, 2020. "Analysis of the Impact of High-Frequency Trading on Artificial Market Liquidity," Papers 2010.13038, arXiv.org.
    2. Chen, Guanhua & Liu, Xiangli & Liu, Xiao & Zhao, Zhihua, 2024. "ETF ownership and stock pricing efficiency: The role of ETF arbitrage," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 62(PA).
    3. Leung, David Wing Yu & Wong, Joe Ho-Yeung & Fong, Tom Pak-Wing, 2024. "Run risks of cash-redeemable ETFs," Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, Elsevier, vol. 85(C).
    4. Rhodes, Meredith E. & Mason, Joseph R., 2023. "ETF ownership and firm-specific information in corporate bond returns," Journal of Financial Markets, Elsevier, vol. 63(C).
    5. Box, Travis & Davis, Ryan & Evans, Richard & Lynch, Andrew, 2021. "Intraday arbitrage between ETFs and their underlying portfolios," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 141(3), pages 1078-1095.
    6. An, Yu & Benetton, Matteo & Song, Yang, 2023. "Index providers: Whales behind the scenes of ETFs," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 149(3), pages 407-433.
    7. Bae, Kyounghun & Kim, Daejin, 2020. "Liquidity risk and exchange-traded fund returns, variances, and tracking errors," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 138(1), pages 222-253.
    8. Luca J. Liebi, 2020. "The effect of ETFs on financial markets: a literature review," Financial Markets and Portfolio Management, Springer;Swiss Society for Financial Market Research, vol. 34(2), pages 165-178, June.
    9. Hommes, Cars H., 2006. "Heterogeneous Agent Models in Economics and Finance," Handbook of Computational Economics, in: Leigh Tesfatsion & Kenneth L. Judd (ed.), Handbook of Computational Economics, edition 1, volume 2, chapter 23, pages 1109-1186, Elsevier.
    10. Sandrine Jacob Leal & Mauro Napoletano & Andrea Roventini & Giorgio Fagiolo, 2016. "Rock around the clock: An agent-based model of low- and high-frequency trading," Journal of Evolutionary Economics, Springer, vol. 26(1), pages 49-76, March.
    11. Lawrence Glosten & Suresh Nallareddy & Yuan Zou, 2021. "ETF Activity and Informational Efficiency of Underlying Securities," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 67(1), pages 22-47, January.
    12. Mahiro Hoshino & Takanobu Mizuta & Yasuhiro Sudo & Isao Yagi, 2022. "Impact of maker-taker fees on stock exchange competition from an agent-based simulation," Journal of Computational Social Science, Springer, vol. 5(2), pages 1323-1342, November.
    13. Fu, Chengbo & Huang, Qiping & Tang, Hongfei, 2022. "Do ETFs affect ADRs and U.S. domestic stocks differently?," Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions and Money, Elsevier, vol. 80(C).
    14. Xu, Liao & Yin, Xiangkang & Zhao, Jing, 2019. "The sidedness and informativeness of ETF trading and the market efficiency of their underlying indexes," Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, Elsevier, vol. 58(C).
    15. Enrique Molina‐Muñoz & Andrés Mora‐Valencia & Javier Perote, 2021. "Backtesting expected shortfall for world stock index ETFs with extreme value theory and Gram–Charlier mixtures," International Journal of Finance & Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 26(3), pages 4163-4189, July.
    16. Sandrine Jacob Leal & Mauro Napoletano, 2017. "Market Stability vs. Market Resilience: Regulatory Policies Experiments in an Agent-Based Model with Low- and High-Frequency Trading," Post-Print hal-01768876, HAL.
    17. Saæglam, Mehmet & Tuzun, Tugkan & Wermers, Russ, 2021. "Do ETFs increase liquidity?," CFR Working Papers 21-03, University of Cologne, Centre for Financial Research (CFR).
    18. Gemayel, Roland & Franus, Tatiana & Bowden, James, 2023. "Price discovery between Bitcoin spot markets and exchange traded products," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 228(C).
    19. Leal, Sandrine Jacob & Napoletano, Mauro, 2019. "Market stability vs. market resilience: Regulatory policies experiments in an agent-based model with low- and high-frequency trading," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 157(C), pages 15-41.
    20. De Rossi, Giuliano & Steliaros, Michael, 2022. "The Shift from Active to Passive and its Effect on Intraday Stock Dynamics," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 143(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:jcsosc:v:7:y:2024:i:3:d:10.1007_s42001-024-00324-0. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.