IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/jcomop/v27y2014i3d10.1007_s10878-012-9537-0.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Popularity at minimum cost

Author

Listed:
  • Telikepalli Kavitha

    (Tata Institute of Fundamental Research)

  • Meghana Nasre

    (The University of Texas at Austin)

  • Prajakta Nimbhorkar

    (Chennai Mathematical Institute)

Abstract

We consider an extension of the popular matching problem in this paper. The input to the popular matching problem is a bipartite graph $G = (\mathcal{A}\cup\mathcal{B},E)$ , where $\mathcal{A}$ is a set of people, $\mathcal{B}$ is a set of items, and each person $a \in\mathcal{A}$ ranks a subset of items in order of preference, with ties allowed. The popular matching problem seeks to compute a matching M ∗ between people and items such that there is no matching M where more people are happier with M than with M ∗. Such a matching M ∗ is called a popular matching. However, there are simple instances where no popular matching exists. Here we consider the following natural extension to the above problem: associated with each item $b \in\mathcal{B}$ is a non-negative price cost(b), that is, for any item b, new copies of b can be added to the input graph by paying an amount of cost(b) per copy. When G does not admit a popular matching, the problem is to “augment” G at minimum cost such that the new graph admits a popular matching. We show that this problem is NP-hard; in fact, it is NP-hard to approximate it within a factor of $\sqrt{n_{1}}/2$ , where n 1 is the number of people. This problem has a simple polynomial time algorithm when each person has a preference list of length at most 2. However, if we consider the problem of constructing a graph at minimum cost that admits a popular matching that matches all people, then even with preference lists of length 2, the problem becomes NP-hard. On the other hand, when the number of copies of each item is fixed, we show that the problem of computing a minimum cost popular matching or deciding that no popular matching exists can be solved in O(mn 1) time, where m is the number of edges.

Suggested Citation

  • Telikepalli Kavitha & Meghana Nasre & Prajakta Nimbhorkar, 2014. "Popularity at minimum cost," Journal of Combinatorial Optimization, Springer, vol. 27(3), pages 574-596, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:jcomop:v:27:y:2014:i:3:d:10.1007_s10878-012-9537-0
    DOI: 10.1007/s10878-012-9537-0
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10878-012-9537-0
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10878-012-9537-0?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Eric McDermid & Robert W. Irving, 2011. "Popular matchings: structure and algorithms," Journal of Combinatorial Optimization, Springer, vol. 22(3), pages 339-358, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Naoyuki Kamiyama, 2016. "The popular matching and condensation problems under matroid constraints," Journal of Combinatorial Optimization, Springer, vol. 32(4), pages 1305-1326, November.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Bettina Klaus & David F. Manlove & Francesca Rossi, 2014. "Matching under Preferences," Cahiers de Recherches Economiques du Département d'économie 14.07, Université de Lausanne, Faculté des HEC, Département d’économie.
    2. Naoyuki Kamiyama, 2016. "The popular matching and condensation problems under matroid constraints," Journal of Combinatorial Optimization, Springer, vol. 32(4), pages 1305-1326, November.
    3. Agnes Cseh & Telikepalli Kavitha, 2017. "Popular Edges and Dominant Matchings," CERS-IE WORKING PAPERS 1725, Institute of Economics, Centre for Economic and Regional Studies.
    4. Kondratev, Aleksei Y. & Nesterov, Alexander S., 2022. "Minimal envy and popular matchings," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 296(3), pages 776-787.
    5. Aleksei Yu. Kondratev & Alexander S. Nesterov, 2018. "Random Paths to Popularity in Two-Sided Matching," HSE Working papers WP BRP 195/EC/2018, National Research University Higher School of Economics.
    6. Heeger, Klaus & Cseh, Ágnes, 2024. "Popular matchings with weighted voters," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 144(C), pages 300-328.
    7. Agnes Cseh & Chien-Chung Huang & Telikepalli Kavitha, 2017. "Popular matchings with two-sided preferences and one-sided ties," CERS-IE WORKING PAPERS 1723, Institute of Economics, Centre for Economic and Regional Studies.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:jcomop:v:27:y:2014:i:3:d:10.1007_s10878-012-9537-0. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.