IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/jclass/v35y2018i1d10.1007_s00357-018-9251-4.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Multivariate Logistic Distance Model for the Analysis of Multiple Binary Responses

Author

Listed:
  • Hailemichael M. Worku

    (Leiden University)

  • Mark Rooij

    (Leiden University)

Abstract

We propose a Multivariate Logistic Distance (MLD) model for the analysis of multiple binary responses in the presence of predictors. The MLD model can be used to simultaneously assess the dimensional/factorial structure of the data and to study the effect of the predictor variables on each of the response variables. To enhance interpretation, the results of the proposed model can be graphically represented in a biplot, showing predictor variable axes, the categories of the response variables and the subjects’ positions. The interpretation of the biplot uses a distance rule. The MLD model belongs to the family of marginal models for multivariate responses, as opposed to latent variable models and conditionally specified models. By setting the distance between the two categories of every response variable to be equal, the MLD model becomes equivalent to a marginal model for multivariate binary data estimated using a GEE method. In that case the MLD model can be fitted using existing statistical packages with a GEE procedure, e.g., the genmod procedure from SAS or the geepack package from R. Without the equality constraint, the MLD model is a general model which can be fitted by its own right. We applied the proposed model to empirical data to illustrate its advantages.

Suggested Citation

  • Hailemichael M. Worku & Mark Rooij, 2018. "A Multivariate Logistic Distance Model for the Analysis of Multiple Binary Responses," Journal of Classification, Springer;The Classification Society, vol. 35(1), pages 124-146, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:jclass:v:35:y:2018:i:1:d:10.1007_s00357-018-9251-4
    DOI: 10.1007/s00357-018-9251-4
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s00357-018-9251-4
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s00357-018-9251-4?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Mark Rooij, 2009. "Ideal Point Discriminant Analysis Revisited with a Special Emphasis on Visualization," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 74(2), pages 317-330, June.
    2. Cheng, Guang & Yu, Zhuqing & Huang, Jianhua Z., 2013. "The cluster bootstrap consistency in generalized estimating equations," Journal of Multivariate Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 115(C), pages 33-47.
    3. Wei, Xin, 2012. "%PROC_R: A SAS Macro that Enables Native R Programming in the Base SAS Environment," Journal of Statistical Software, Foundation for Open Access Statistics, vol. 46(c02).
    4. Andreas Ziegler & Gerhard Arminger, 1995. "Analyzing the Employment Status with Panel Data from the GSOEP: A Comparison of the MECOSA and the GEE1 Approach for Marginal Models," Vierteljahrshefte zur Wirtschaftsforschung / Quarterly Journal of Economic Research, DIW Berlin, German Institute for Economic Research, vol. 64(1), pages 72-80.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Sant’Anna, Pedro H.C. & Zhao, Jun, 2020. "Doubly robust difference-in-differences estimators," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 219(1), pages 101-122.
    2. Victor Chernozhukov & Iván Fernández-Val & Blaise Melly & Kaspar Wüthrich, 2020. "Generic Inference on Quantile and Quantile Effect Functions for Discrete Outcomes," Journal of the American Statistical Association, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 115(529), pages 123-137, January.
    3. Mark Rooij, 2018. "Transitional modeling of experimental longitudinal data with missing values," Advances in Data Analysis and Classification, Springer;German Classification Society - Gesellschaft für Klassifikation (GfKl);Japanese Classification Society (JCS);Classification and Data Analysis Group of the Italian Statistical Society (CLADAG);International Federation of Classification Societies (IFCS), vol. 12(1), pages 107-130, March.
    4. Hailemichael M. Worku & Mark De Rooij, 2017. "Properties of Ideal Point Classification Models for Bivariate Binary Data," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 82(2), pages 308-328, June.
    5. Brantly Callaway & Pedro H. C. Sant'Anna, 2018. "Difference-in-Differences with Multiple Time Periods and an Application on the Minimum Wage and Employment," DETU Working Papers 1804, Department of Economics, Temple University.
    6. Guang Cheng, 2013. "How Many Iterations are Sufficient for Efficient Semiparametric Estimation?," Scandinavian Journal of Statistics, Danish Society for Theoretical Statistics;Finnish Statistical Society;Norwegian Statistical Association;Swedish Statistical Association, vol. 40(3), pages 592-618, September.
    7. Callaway, Brantly & Sant’Anna, Pedro H.C., 2021. "Difference-in-Differences with multiple time periods," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 225(2), pages 200-230.
    8. Budiaji, Weksi, 2012. "Item Response Model from a Distance Perspective," Thesis Commons wcbu9, Center for Open Science.
    9. repec:cup:judgdm:v:9:y:2014:i:2:p:90-103 is not listed on IDEAS
    10. He, Hongwei & Hu, Yansong, 2021. "The dynamic impacts of shared leadership and the transactive memory system on team performance: A longitudinal study," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 130(C), pages 14-26.
    11. Anthony M. Evans & Joachim I. Krueger, 2014. "Outcomes and expectations in dilemmas of trust," Judgment and Decision Making, Society for Judgment and Decision Making, vol. 9(2), pages 90-103, March.
    12. Martin Spiess & Pascal Jordan & Mike Wendt, 2019. "Simplified Estimation and Testing in Unbalanced Repeated Measures Designs," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 84(1), pages 212-235, March.
    13. Hudecová, Šárka & Pešta, Michal, 2013. "Modeling dependencies in claims reserving with GEE," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 53(3), pages 786-794.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:jclass:v:35:y:2018:i:1:d:10.1007_s00357-018-9251-4. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.