IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/jagbes/v25y2020i4d10.1007_s13253-020-00402-6.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Pseudo-Likelihood or Quadrature? What We Thought We Knew, What We Think We Know, and What We Are Still Trying to Figure Out

Author

Listed:
  • Walt Stroup

    (University of Nebraska-Lincoln)

  • Elizabeth Claassen

    (SAS Institute)

Abstract

Two predominant computing methods for generalized linear mixed models (GLMMs) are linearization, e.g., pseudo-likelihood (PL), and integral approximation, e.g., Gauss–Hermite quadrature. The primary GLMM package in R, LME4, only uses integral approximation. The primary GLMM procedure in SAS®, PROC GLIMMIX, was originally developed using linearization, but integral approximation methods were added in the 2008 release. This presents a dilemma for GLMM users: Which method should one use, and why? Linearization methods are more versatile and able to handle both conditional and marginal GLMMs. Linearization can be implemented with REML-like variance component estimation, whereas quadrature is strictly maximum likelihood. However, GLMM software documentation and the literature on which it is based tend to focus on linearization’s limitations. Stroup (Generalized linear mixed models: modern concepts, methods and applications, CRC Press, Boca Raton, 2013) reiterates this theme in his GLMM textbook. As a result, “conventional wisdom” has arisen that integral approximation—quadrature when possible—is always best. Meanwhile, ongoing experience with GLMMs and research about their small sample behavior suggest that “conventional wisdom” circa 2013 is often not true. Above all, it is clear there is no one-size-fits-all best method. The purpose of this paper is to provide an updated look at what we now know about quadrature and PL and to offer some general operating principles for making an informed choice between the two. A series of simulation studies investigating distributions and designs representative of research in agricultural and related disciplines provide an overview of each method with respect to estimation accuracy, type I error control, and robustness (or lack thereof) to model misspecification. Supplementary materials accompanying this paper appear online.

Suggested Citation

  • Walt Stroup & Elizabeth Claassen, 2020. "Pseudo-Likelihood or Quadrature? What We Thought We Knew, What We Think We Know, and What We Are Still Trying to Figure Out," Journal of Agricultural, Biological and Environmental Statistics, Springer;The International Biometric Society;American Statistical Association, vol. 25(4), pages 639-656, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:jagbes:v:25:y:2020:i:4:d:10.1007_s13253-020-00402-6
    DOI: 10.1007/s13253-020-00402-6
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s13253-020-00402-6
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s13253-020-00402-6?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Hilbe,Joseph M., 2014. "Modeling Count Data," Cambridge Books, Cambridge University Press, number 9781107028333, January.
    2. Molas, Marek & Lesaffre, Emmanuel, 2011. "Hierarchical Generalized Linear Models: The R Package HGLMMM," Journal of Statistical Software, Foundation for Open Access Statistics, vol. 39(i13).
    3. Murray, D.M. & Varnell, S.P. & Blitstein, J.L., 2004. "Design and Analysis of Group-Randomized Trials: A Review of Recent Methodological Developments," American Journal of Public Health, American Public Health Association, vol. 94(3), pages 423-432.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Ting Wang & Benjamin Graves & Yves Rosseel & Edgar C. Merkle, 2022. "Computation and application of generalized linear mixed model derivatives using lme4," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 87(3), pages 1173-1193, September.
    2. Hans-Peter Piepho & Robert J. Tempelman & Emlyn R. Williams, 2020. "Guest Editors’ Introduction to the Special Issue on “Recent Advances in Design and Analysis of Experiments and Observational Studies in Agriculture”," Journal of Agricultural, Biological and Environmental Statistics, Springer;The International Biometric Society;American Statistical Association, vol. 25(4), pages 453-456, December.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Luiz Paulo Fávero & Joseph F. Hair & Rafael de Freitas Souza & Matheus Albergaria & Talles V. Brugni, 2021. "Zero-Inflated Generalized Linear Mixed Models: A Better Way to Understand Data Relationships," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 9(10), pages 1-28, May.
    2. Wu, Jiang & Ou, Guiyan & Liu, Xiaohui & Dong, Ke, 2022. "How does academic education background affect top researchers’ performance? Evidence from the field of artificial intelligence," Journal of Informetrics, Elsevier, vol. 16(2).
    3. Gning, Lucien & Diagne, M.L. & Tchuenche, J.M., 2023. "Hierarchical generalized linear models, correlation and a posteriori ratemaking," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 614(C).
    4. Jonathan L. Blitstein & Peter J. Hannan & David M. Murray & William R. Shadish, 2005. "Increasing the Degrees of Freedom in Existing Group Randomized Trials," Evaluation Review, , vol. 29(3), pages 241-267, June.
    5. Lutz Bornmann & Robin Haunschild & Rüdiger Mutz, 2021. "Growth rates of modern science: a latent piecewise growth curve approach to model publication numbers from established and new literature databases," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 8(1), pages 1-15, December.
    6. repec:mpr:mprres:4632 is not listed on IDEAS
    7. Peter Z. Schochet, "undated". "Statistical Power for Random Assignment Evaluations of Education Programs," Mathematica Policy Research Reports 6749d31ad72d4acf988f7dce5, Mathematica Policy Research.
    8. Solymosi, Reka & Petcu, Oana & Wilkinson, Jack, 2020. "Exploring public engagement with missing person appeals on Twitter," SocArXiv wugxs, Center for Open Science.
    9. Moritz Berger & Gerhard Tutz, 2021. "Transition models for count data: a flexible alternative to fixed distribution models," Statistical Methods & Applications, Springer;Società Italiana di Statistica, vol. 30(4), pages 1259-1283, October.
    10. Maurits J. Meijers & Harmen van der Veer, 2019. "MEP Responses to Democratic Backsliding in Hungary and Poland. An Analysis of Agenda‐Setting and Voting Behaviour," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 57(4), pages 838-856, July.
    11. de Rezende, Rafael & Egert, Katharina & Marin, Ignacio & Thompson, Guilherme, 2022. "A white-boxed ISSM approach to estimate uncertainty distributions of Walmart sales," International Journal of Forecasting, Elsevier, vol. 38(4), pages 1460-1467.
    12. Andries, Petra & Hünermund, Paul, 2020. "Firm-level effects of staged investments in innovation: The moderating role of resource availability," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 49(7).
    13. Yves Arrighi & David Crainich & Véronique Flambard & Sophie Massin, 2022. "Personalized information and willingness to pay for non-financial risk prevention: An experiment," Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, Springer, vol. 65(1), pages 57-82, August.
    14. Lin, Jun-You, 2017. "Balancing industry collaboration and academic innovation: The contingent role of collaboration-specific attributes," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 123(C), pages 216-228.
    15. Jae Teuk Chin, 2020. "Location Choice of New Business Establishments: Understanding the Local Context and Neighborhood Conditions in the United States," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(2), pages 1-17, January.
    16. Di Novi, Cinzia & Leporatti, Lucia & Levaggi, Rosella & Montefiori, Marcello, 2022. "Adherence during COVID-19: The role of aging and socio-economics status in shaping drug utilization," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 204(C), pages 1-14.
    17. Hu, Feng & Bijmolt, Tammo H.A. & Huizingh, Eelko K.R.E., 2020. "The impact of innovation contest briefs on the quality of solvers and solutions," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 90.
    18. Sinclair, Michael & Ghermandi, Andrea & Signorello, Giovanni & Giuffrida, Laura & De Salvo, Maria, 2022. "Valuing Recreation in Italy's Protected Areas Using Spatial Big Data," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 200(C).
    19. Hélène Sancho-Garnier & Bruno Pereira & Pierre Césarini, 2012. "A Cluster Randomized Trial to Evaluate a Health Education Programme “Living with Sun at School”," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 9(7), pages 1-17, July.
    20. Kimberly F. Sellers & Ali Arab & Sean Melville & Fanyu Cui, 2021. "A flexible univariate moving average time-series model for dispersed count data," Journal of Statistical Distributions and Applications, Springer, vol. 8(1), pages 1-12, December.
    21. Hilbe, Joseph M., 2015. "The New Statistics with R: An Introduction for Biologists," Journal of Statistical Software, Foundation for Open Access Statistics, vol. 68(b01).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:jagbes:v:25:y:2020:i:4:d:10.1007_s13253-020-00402-6. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.