IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/irpnmk/v13y2016i2d10.1007_s12208-016-0159-6.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Measuring academic service performance for competitive advantage in tertiary education institutions: the development of the TEdPERF scale

Author

Listed:
  • Francisco G. Rodríguez-González

    (Tecnologico de Monterrey)

  • Paulina Segarra

    (Tecnologico de Monterrey)

Abstract

Public and private universities are in constant competition in order to select the best possible students. Thus, student satisfaction has become increasingly relevant for higher education institutions. Assessing academic services performance allows universities to differentiate themselves from others through the improvement of service quality. In our study, we aim to measure service quality in tertiary education institutions in Mexico. In order to do so, we have used a service performance approach to develop a new scale, which is specifically targeted for tertiary education institutions: TEdPERF (Tertiary Education PERFormance). This scale has been tested for reliability, validity and dimensionality. Moreover, the scale has proved to measure key factors of service quality performance in Mexican higher education institutions. Finally, we describe the full process through which the scale was developed and validated.

Suggested Citation

  • Francisco G. Rodríguez-González & Paulina Segarra, 2016. "Measuring academic service performance for competitive advantage in tertiary education institutions: the development of the TEdPERF scale," International Review on Public and Nonprofit Marketing, Springer;International Association of Public and Non-Profit Marketing, vol. 13(2), pages 171-183, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:irpnmk:v:13:y:2016:i:2:d:10.1007_s12208-016-0159-6
    DOI: 10.1007/s12208-016-0159-6
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s12208-016-0159-6
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s12208-016-0159-6?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Helena Alves & Mário Raposo, 2009. "The measurement of the construct satisfaction in higher education," The Service Industries Journal, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 29(2), pages 203-218, February.
    2. Louis Guttman, 1945. "A basis for analyzing test-retest reliability," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 10(4), pages 255-282, December.
    3. Richard Zinbarg & William Revelle & Iftah Yovel & Wen Li, 2005. "Cronbach’s α, Revelle’s β, and Mcdonald’s ω H : their relations with each other and two alternative conceptualizations of reliability," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 70(1), pages 123-133, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Anne-Catherine Guio & David Gordon & Eric Marlier & Hector Najera & Marco Pomati, 2018. "Towards an EU measure of child deprivation," Child Indicators Research, Springer;The International Society of Child Indicators (ISCI), vol. 11(3), pages 835-860, June.
    2. Gaetano Martino & Giulia Giacchè & Enrica Rossetti, 2016. "Organizing the Co-Production of Health and Environmental Values in Food Production: The Constitutional Processes in the Relationships between Italian Solidarity Purchasing Groups and Farmers," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(4), pages 1-22, March.
    3. Klaas Sijtsma, 2012. "Future of Psychometrics: Ask What Psychometrics Can Do for Psychology," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 77(1), pages 4-20, January.
    4. Anita Kéri & Erzsébet Hetesi, 2022. "Is it only the university they are satisfied with? – Foreign student satisfaction and its effect on loyalty," International Review on Public and Nonprofit Marketing, Springer;International Association of Public and Non-Profit Marketing, vol. 19(3), pages 601-622, September.
    5. Jos Berge & Gregor Sočan, 2004. "The greatest lower bound to the reliability of a test and the hypothesis of unidimensionality," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 69(4), pages 613-625, December.
    6. José Luis Vázquez & Carlota L. Aza & Ana Lanero, 2016. "University social responsibility as antecedent of students’ satisfaction," International Review on Public and Nonprofit Marketing, Springer;International Association of Public and Non-Profit Marketing, vol. 13(2), pages 137-149, July.
    7. W. Nicewander, 1990. "A latent-trait based reliability estimate and upper bound," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 55(1), pages 65-74, March.
    8. Ofori Debrah & Nasiru Inusah & Joseph Yaw Dwommor, 2021. "Students' Satisfaction with Accounting Teachers' Lesson Delivery, the Role of Perceived Quality of Lesson Delivery in Ghanaian Senior High Schools," Business and Economic Research, Macrothink Institute, vol. 11(1), pages 109-124, March.
    9. Brittney K. Anderson & John P. Meyer & Chelsea Vaters & Jose A. Espinoza, 2020. "Measuring Personal Growth and Development in Context: Evidence of Validity in Educational and Work Settings," Journal of Happiness Studies, Springer, vol. 21(6), pages 2141-2167, August.
    10. Clemens M Lechner & Daniel Danner & Beatrice Rammstedt, 2019. "Grit (effortful persistence) can be measured with a short scale, shows little variation across socio-demographic subgroups, and is associated with career success and career engagement," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(11), pages 1-29, November.
    11. Piotr Koc, 2021. "Measuring Non-electoral Political Participation: Bi-factor Model as a Tool to Extract Dimensions," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 156(1), pages 271-287, July.
    12. Jules L. Ellis & Klaas Sijtsma, 2024. "Proof of Reliability Convergence to 1 at Rate of Spearman–Brown Formula for Random Test Forms and Irrespective of Item Pool Dimensionality," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 89(3), pages 774-795, September.
    13. Escribano, Rosario & Treviño, Ernesto & Nussbaum, Miguel & Torres Irribarra, David & Carrasco, Diego, 2020. "How much does the quality of teaching vary at under-performing schools? Evidence from classroom observations in Chile," International Journal of Educational Development, Elsevier, vol. 72(C).
    14. Bhaskar Mukherjee & Siniša Subotić & Ajay Kumar Chaubey, 2018. "And now for something completely different: the congruence of the Altmetric Attention Score’s structure between different article groups," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 114(1), pages 253-275, January.
    15. Walter Kristof, 1974. "Estimation of reliability and true score variance from a split of a test into three arbitrary parts," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 39(4), pages 491-499, December.
    16. Salim Moussa, 2016. "A Comment on the Estimation of the Reliability of Multidimensional Marketing Constructs: A Store Personality Scale Application," Global Business Review, International Management Institute, vol. 17(5), pages 1125-1144, October.
    17. Jeanne A. Teresi & Katja Ocepek-Welikson & John A. Toner & Marjorie Kleinman & Mildred Ramirez & Joseph P. Eimicke & Barry J. Gurland & Albert Siu, 2017. "Methodological Issues in Measuring Subjective Well-Being and Quality-of-Life: Applications to Assessment of Affect in Older, Chronically and Cognitively Impaired, Ethnically Diverse Groups Using the F," Applied Research in Quality of Life, Springer;International Society for Quality-of-Life Studies, vol. 12(2), pages 251-288, June.
    18. Lena Busch & Till Utesch & Bernd Strauss, 2019. "Validation of the vignette-based German Exercise Causality Orientation Scale (G-ECOS)," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(10), pages 1-20, October.
    19. Eunseong Cho, 2021. "Neither Cronbach’s Alpha nor McDonald’s Omega: A Commentary on Sijtsma and Pfadt," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 86(4), pages 877-886, December.
    20. Wingyan Chung & Yinqiang Zhang & Jia Pan, 2023. "A Theory-based Deep-Learning Approach to Detecting Disinformation in Financial Social Media," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 25(2), pages 473-492, April.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:irpnmk:v:13:y:2016:i:2:d:10.1007_s12208-016-0159-6. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.