IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/infsem/v22y2024i2d10.1007_s10257-023-00663-x.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A blockchain-powered e-cognocracy model for democratic decision making

Author

Listed:
  • Sepehr Ghazinoory

    (Tarbiat Modares University)

  • Amirhosein Mardani

    (Tarbiat Modares University)

  • Mohammad Ali Maddah-Ali

    (University of Minnesota)

  • Gholam Ali Montazer

    (Tarbiat Modares University)

Abstract

Electronic governance is used to empower citizens and help governments and organizations with strategic decision-making or policy-making. E-democracy and e-participation methods are essential tools used to engage citizens in decision-making. One of the recent e-democracy models is known as e-cognocracy. While having advantages relative to traditional e-democracy models, e-cognocracy still faces challenges such as fraud, centralization, information failure (voting paradox), and participation rate. This paper aims to design a blockchain-based electronic democracy model on a smart contract using e-cognocracy as the base model and the concept of futarchy and prediction markets. Using the design science research methodology, a three-stage blockchain-powered e-cognocracy method for democratic decision-making is developed. The proposed method of research includes three main stages: (1) Setting the problem, (2) the voting process, and (3) knowledge diffusion and evaluation, and the stage are done through several activities. This method is implemented as a smart contract on the Ethereum platform. Using the power of blockchain technology and the economic incentive model of futarchy, this method overcomes three main challenges for e-cognocracy. To demonstrate the methodology, it was applied in a real-case experience.

Suggested Citation

  • Sepehr Ghazinoory & Amirhosein Mardani & Mohammad Ali Maddah-Ali & Gholam Ali Montazer, 2024. "A blockchain-powered e-cognocracy model for democratic decision making," Information Systems and e-Business Management, Springer, vol. 22(2), pages 209-246, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:infsem:v:22:y:2024:i:2:d:10.1007_s10257-023-00663-x
    DOI: 10.1007/s10257-023-00663-x
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10257-023-00663-x
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10257-023-00663-x?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Nicolas Kube, 2018. "Daniel Drescher: Blockchain basics: a non-technical introduction in 25 steps," Financial Markets and Portfolio Management, Springer;Swiss Society for Financial Market Research, vol. 32(3), pages 329-331, August.
    2. Aline Dresch & Daniel Pacheco Lacerda & José Antônio Valle Antunes, 2015. "Proposal for the Conduct of Design Science Research," Springer Books, in: Design Science Research, edition 127, chapter 0, pages 117-127, Springer.
    3. Aline Dresch & Daniel Pacheco Lacerda & José Antônio Valle Antunes Jr, 2015. "Design Science Research," Springer Books, Springer, edition 127, number 978-3-319-07374-3, January.
    4. Dominique Guegan, 2017. "Public Blockchain versus Private blockchain," Documents de travail du Centre d'Economie de la Sorbonne 17020, Université Panthéon-Sorbonne (Paris 1), Centre d'Economie de la Sorbonne.
    5. Peter Racsko, 2019. "Blockchain and Democracy," Society and Economy, Akadémiai Kiadó, Hungary, vol. 41(3), pages 353-369, September.
    6. Rainer Böhme & Nicolas Christin & Benjamin Edelman & Tyler Moore, 2015. "Bitcoin: Economics, Technology, and Governance," Journal of Economic Perspectives, American Economic Association, vol. 29(2), pages 213-238, Spring.
    7. José María Moreno-Jiménez & Cristina Pérez-Espés & Pilar Rivera-Torres, 2020. "Relevant Aspects for an EF3-Evaluation of E-Cognocracy," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 8(2), pages 1-19, February.
    8. Aline Dresch & Daniel Pacheco Lacerda & José Antônio Valle Antunes, 2015. "Design Science Research," Springer Books, in: Design Science Research, edition 127, chapter 0, pages 67-102, Springer.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jeanine Többen & Raymond Opdenakker, 2022. "Developing a Framework to Integrate Circularity into Construction Projects," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-27, April.
    2. Bernhard Koelmel & Max Borsch & Rebecca Bulander & Lukas Waidelich & Tanja Brugger & Ansgar Kuehn & Matthias Weyer & Luc Schmerber & Michael Krutwig, 2023. "Quantifying the Economic and Financial Viability of NB-IoT and LoRaWAN Technologies: A Comprehensive Life Cycle Cost Analysis Using Pragmatic Computational Tools," FinTech, MDPI, vol. 2(3), pages 1-17, July.
    3. Sajid Ullah & Naveed Ahmad & Farman Ullah Khan & Alina Badulescu & Daniel Badulescu, 2021. "Mapping Interactions among Green Innovations Barriers in Manufacturing Industry Using Hybrid Methodology: Insights from a Developing Country," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(15), pages 1-25, July.
    4. Ismael Rodrigo Specht & Cristiane Froehlich & Juliana Bondan & Cristine Hermann Nodari, 2024. "Frugal Innovation and Sustainability in the Footwear Sector," RAC - Revista de Administração Contemporânea (Journal of Contemporary Administration), ANPAD - Associação Nacional de Pós-Graduação e Pesquisa em Administração, vol. 28(Vol. 28 N), pages 230228-2302.
    5. Alex S. Príncipe & Aloísio S. N. Filho & Bruna A. S. Machado & Josiane D. V. Barbosa & Ingrid Winkler & Cristiano V. Ferreira, 2023. "Decision Support Frameworks in Public Health Emergencies: A Systematic Review of Dynamic Models in Complex Contexts," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(17), pages 1-25, August.
    6. Sajid Ullah & Farman Ullah Khan & Vanina Adoriana Trifan & Adina Eleonora Spinu & Grigorie Sanda, 2022. "Modeling Key Strategies for Reducing Socio-Economic and Health Crisis: Perspective from COVID-19 Pandemic," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(21), pages 1-21, October.
    7. Fabiane Tubino Garcia & Carla Schwengber ten Caten & Elaine Aparecida Regiani de Campos & Aline Marian Callegaro & Diego Augusto de Jesus Pacheco, 2022. "Mortality Risk Factors in Micro and Small Businesses: Systematic Literature Review and Research Agenda," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(5), pages 1-37, February.
    8. Rosiane Serrano & Luis Henrique Rodrigues & Daniel Pacheco Lacerda & Priscila Bonalume Paraboni, 2018. "Systems Thinking and Scenario Planning: Application in the Clothing Sector," Systemic Practice and Action Research, Springer, vol. 31(5), pages 509-537, October.
    9. Vinicius Luiz Ferraz Minatogawa & Matheus Munhoz Vieira Franco & Izabela Simon Rampasso & Rosley Anholon & Ruy Quadros & Orlando Durán & Antonio Batocchio, 2019. "Operationalizing Business Model Innovation through Big Data Analytics for Sustainable Organizations," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(1), pages 1-29, December.
    10. Leandro Gauss & Daniel P. Lacerda & Paulo A. Cauchick Miguel, 2021. "Module-based product family design: systematic literature review and meta-synthesis," Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, Springer, vol. 32(1), pages 265-312, January.
    11. Lutui, Raymond, 2016. "A multidisciplinary digital forensic investigation process model," Business Horizons, Elsevier, vol. 59(6), pages 593-604.
    12. Mahyar Habibi Rad & Mohammad Mojtahedi & Michael J. Ostwald, 2021. "The Integration of Lean and Resilience Paradigms: A Systematic Review Identifying Current and Future Research Directions," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(16), pages 1-24, August.
    13. Ternus Lamb, Israel & Pacheco Lacerda, Daniel & Dresch, Aline, 2016. "A tecnologia empresarial Odebrecht como filosofia de projeto organizacional – um estudo de caso na Braskem S.A [Odebrecht entrepreneurial technology as organisational project philosophy – a case st," MPRA Paper 82482, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised 20 May 2016.
    14. Fabricio Eidelwein & Fabio Antonio Sartori Piran & Daniel Pacheco Lacerda & Aline Dresch & Luis Henrique Rodrigues, 2018. "Exploratory Analysis of Modularization Strategy Based on the Theory of Constraints Thinking Process," Global Journal of Flexible Systems Management, Springer;Global Institute of Flexible Systems Management, vol. 19(2), pages 111-122, June.
    15. Ana Maria Magalhães Correia & Clarissa Figueredo Rocha & Luiz Carlos Duclós & Claudimar Pereira da Veiga, 2021. "Integration of Business Processes With Activities and Information: Evidence From Brazil," SAGE Open, , vol. 11(1), pages 21582440211, March.
    16. Kasper P.H. Lange & Gijsbert Korevaar & Inge F. Oskam & Paulien M. Herder, 2017. "Developing and Understanding Design Interventions in Relation to Industrial Symbiosis Dynamics," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(5), pages 1-14, May.
    17. Majed Bin Othayman & Abdulrahim Meshari & John Mulyata & Yaw Debrah, 2021. "Challenges Experienced by Public Higher Education Institutions of Learning in the Implementation of Training and Development: A Case Study of Saudi Arabian Higher Education," Journal of Business Administration Research, Journal of Business Administration Research, Sciedu Press, vol. 10(2), pages 1-36, October.
    18. Koldewey, Christian & Hemminger, Anja & Reinhold, Jannik & Gausemeier, Jürgen & Dumitrescu, Roman & Chohan, Nadia & Frank, Maximilian, 2022. "Aligning strategic position, behavior, and structure for smart service businesses in manufacturing," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 175(C).
    19. Stadtherr, Frank & Wouters, Marc, 2021. "Extending target costing to include targets for R&D costs and production investments for a modular product portfolio—A case study," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 231(C).
    20. Clarissa Rocha & Clariana Fernandes Narcizo & Enrico Gianotti, 2019. "Internet of Management Artifacts: Internet of Things Architecture for Business Model Renewal," International Journal of Innovation and Technology Management (IJITM), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 16(08), pages 1-19, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:infsem:v:22:y:2024:i:2:d:10.1007_s10257-023-00663-x. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.