IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/infsem/v16y2018i1d10.1007_s10257-017-0345-z.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The moderation effects of mobile technology advancement and system barrier on m-commerce channel preference behavior

Author

Listed:
  • Nina Shin

    (Seoul National University)

  • Donghui Kim

    (Seoul National University)

  • Sangwook Park

    (Seoul National University)

  • Jungsuk Oh

    (Seoul National University)

Abstract

Mobile commerce, or m-commerce, has quickly become a powerful, indispensable approach for diverse business to consumer (B2C) industries to secure technology-oriented, risk-taking N-generation customers. However, their behavioral preferences have not been investigated in-depth, as most practitioners believe m-commerce consumers are merely a frontier group of e-commerce consumers, and not unique service consumers with distinct characteristics. This study examines m-commerce consumers’ unique behavioral aspects by conducting thorough theoretical research based on an integrated framework that includes the IS success, web satisfaction, and B2C channel preference models. We first construct an integrated model to analyze the fundamental roles of information system quality in an m-commerce context. A set of hypotheses are then tested and studied to verify the moderation effects of ubiquity, localization, personalization (mobile attributes), and cognitive effort (system barriers) on the newly established relationships. The statistical results are obtained using a survey data of 503 consumers with m-commerce service experiences in Korea, a leading m-commerce country. Finally, the results are analyzed and interpreted to identify m-commerce consumers’ perceived service quality levels, as well as their comparative differences against e-commerce consumers. We believe that both researchers and practitioners will benefit from this research, in that it not only isolates a prioritized list of key determinants of m-commerce success, but also highlights the necessity of continuous research effort regarding future market orientations.

Suggested Citation

  • Nina Shin & Donghui Kim & Sangwook Park & Jungsuk Oh, 2018. "The moderation effects of mobile technology advancement and system barrier on m-commerce channel preference behavior," Information Systems and e-Business Management, Springer, vol. 16(1), pages 125-154, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:infsem:v:16:y:2018:i:1:d:10.1007_s10257-017-0345-z
    DOI: 10.1007/s10257-017-0345-z
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10257-017-0345-z
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10257-017-0345-z?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Figge, Stefan, 2004. "Situation-dependent services--a challenge for mobile network operators," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 57(12), pages 1416-1422, December.
    2. Ángel Agudo-Peregrina & Félix Pascual-Miguel & Julián Chaparro-Peláez, 2014. "It’s never the same: the role of homogeneity in online services," Service Business, Springer;Pan-Pacific Business Association, vol. 8(3), pages 453-464, September.
    3. Sarv Devaraj & Ming Fan & Rajiv Kohli, 2002. "Antecedents of B2C Channel Satisfaction and Preference: Validating e-Commerce Metrics," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 13(3), pages 316-333, September.
    4. Andreas Eggert & Wolfgang Ulaga, 2002. "Customer perceived value: a substitute for satisfaction in business markets?," Post-Print hal-00484980, HAL.
    5. Vicki McKinney & Kanghyun Yoon & Fatemeh “Mariam” Zahedi, 2002. "The Measurement of Web-Customer Satisfaction: An Expectation and Disconfirmation Approach," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 13(3), pages 296-315, September.
    6. Tojib, Dewi & Tsarenko, Yelena, 2012. "Post-adoption modeling of advanced mobile service use," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 65(7), pages 922-928.
    7. Ding, David Xin & Hu, Paul Jen-Hwa & Sheng, Olivia R. Liu, 2011. "e-SELFQUAL: A scale for measuring online self-service quality," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 64(5), pages 508-515, May.
    8. Viswanath Venkatesh & Fred D. Davis, 2000. "A Theoretical Extension of the Technology Acceptance Model: Four Longitudinal Field Studies," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 46(2), pages 186-204, February.
    9. Bauer, Hans H. & Falk, Tomas & Hammerschmidt, Maik, 2006. "eTransQual: A transaction process-based approach for capturing service quality in online shopping," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 59(7), pages 866-875, July.
    10. Dholakia, Ruby Roy & Dholakia, Nikhilesh, 2004. "Mobility and markets: emerging outlines of m-commerce," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 57(12), pages 1391-1396, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Hwang, Angel Hsing-Chi & Oh, Jeeyun, 2020. "Interacting with background music engages E-Customers more: The impact of interactive music on consumer perception and behavioral intention," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 54(C).
    2. Stefan Seebacher & Ronny Schüritz & Gerhard Satzger, 2021. "Towards an understanding of technology fit and appropriation in business networks: evidence from blockchain implementations," Information Systems and e-Business Management, Springer, vol. 19(1), pages 183-204, March.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Mohd Naved Khan & Neha Gupta & Manita Matharu & Mohammad Faisal Khan, 2023. "Sustainable E-Service Quality in Tourism: Drivers Evaluation Using AHP-TOPSIS Technique," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(9), pages 1-23, May.
    2. Christophe Bezes, 2009. "E-Commerce Website Evaluation: A Critical Review," Working Papers hal-00611008, HAL.
    3. Brown, Susan A. & Venkatesh, Viswanath & Kuruzovich, Jason & Massey, Anne P., 2008. "Expectation confirmation: An examination of three competing models," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 105(1), pages 52-66, January.
    4. Ding, David Xin & Hu, Paul Jen-Hwa & Sheng, Olivia R. Liu, 2011. "e-SELFQUAL: A scale for measuring online self-service quality," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 64(5), pages 508-515, May.
    5. Sardar Mohammadi & Geoff Dickson, 2024. "Online Shopping for Sporting Goods: The Role of Flow, E-Satisfaction, and E-Loyalty," Global Business Review, International Management Institute, vol. 25(6), pages 1498-1509, December.
    6. Sharma, Mahak & Antony, Rose & Sehrawat, Rajat & Cruz, Angel Contreras & Daim, Tugrul U., 2022. "Exploring post-adoption behaviors of e-service users: Evidence from the hospitality sector /online travel services," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 68(C).
    7. Faqih, Khaled M.S., 2016. "An empirical analysis of factors predicting the behavioral intention to adopt Internet shopping technology among non-shoppers in a developing country context: Does gender matter?," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 30(C), pages 140-164.
    8. Al-Qeisi, Kholoud & Dennis, Charles & Alamanos, Eleftherios & Jayawardhena, Chanaka, 2014. "Website design quality and usage behavior: Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 67(11), pages 2282-2290.
    9. Li, Han & Gupta, Ashish & Zhang, Jie & Flor, Nick, 2020. "Who will use augmented reality? An integrated approach based on text analytics and field survey," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 281(3), pages 502-516.
    10. Liébana-Cabanillas, Francisco & Marinkovic, Veljko & Ramos de Luna, Iviane & Kalinic, Zoran, 2018. "Predicting the determinants of mobile payment acceptance: A hybrid SEM-neural network approach," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 129(C), pages 117-130.
    11. Shin, Jae Ik & Chung, Ki Han & Oh, Jae Sin & Lee, Chang Won, 2013. "The effect of site quality on repurchase intention in Internet shopping through mediating variables: The case of university students in South Korea," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 33(3), pages 453-463.
    12. Dan J. Kim & Donald L. Ferrin & H. Raghav Rao, 2009. "Trust and Satisfaction, Two Stepping Stones for Successful E-Commerce Relationships: A Longitudinal Exploration," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 20(2), pages 237-257, June.
    13. Wang, Sijun & Beatty, Sharon E. & Mothersbaugh, David L., 2009. "Congruity's role in website attitude formation," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 62(6), pages 609-615, June.
    14. Wu, Ing-Long, 2013. "The antecedents of customer satisfaction and its link to complaint intentions in online shopping: An integration of justice, technology, and trust," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 33(1), pages 166-176.
    15. Detmar W. Straub & Donna L. Hoffman & Bruce W. Weber & Charles Steinfield, 2002. "Toward New Metrics for Net-Enhanced Organizations," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 13(3), pages 227-238, September.
    16. Her-Sen Doong & Hsiangchu Lai, 2008. "Exploring usage continuance of e-negotiation systems: expectation and disconfirmation approach," Group Decision and Negotiation, Springer, vol. 17(2), pages 111-126, March.
    17. Demirci Orel, Fatma & Kara, Ali, 2014. "Supermarket self-checkout service quality, customer satisfaction, and loyalty: Empirical evidence from an emerging market," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 21(2), pages 118-129.
    18. Barnes, Stuart J. & Vidgen, Richard T., 2014. "Technology socialness and Web site satisfaction," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 89(C), pages 12-25.
    19. Gummerus, Johanna & Pihlström, Minna, 2011. "Context and mobile services' value-in-use," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 18(6), pages 521-533.
    20. Sohn, Stefanie & Groß, Michael, 2020. "Understanding the inhibitors to consumer mobile purchasing intentions," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 55(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:infsem:v:16:y:2018:i:1:d:10.1007_s10257-017-0345-z. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.