IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/infsem/v15y2017i2d10.1007_s10257-016-0307-x.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Reusing enterprise models to build platform independent computer models

Author

Listed:
  • Verónica Pazos

    (Universitat Jaume I)

  • Ricardo Chalmeta

    (Universitat Jaume I)

Abstract

Enterprises use enterprise models to represent and analyse their processes, products, decisions, organisation, information flows, etc. Nevertheless, the enterprise knowledge that exists in enterprise models is not used beyond these purposes. The main goal of this paper is to present a framework that allows enterprises to reuse enterprise models to build software. The framework includes these dimensions: (1) a methodology that guides the use of the other dimensions in the reutilisation of enterprise models in software generation; (2) a set of metamodels to represent enterprises at the Computation Independent Model (CIM) level; (3) a modelling guide to make enterprise models using the metamodels proposed in this paper; (4) an extraction algorithm to discriminate the part of the CIM model to reuse; and (5) a set of transformation rules to reuse enterprise models to build Platform Independent Models. In addition, a case example is shown to validate the work that was carried out and to identify limitations.

Suggested Citation

  • Verónica Pazos & Ricardo Chalmeta, 2017. "Reusing enterprise models to build platform independent computer models," Information Systems and e-Business Management, Springer, vol. 15(2), pages 377-421, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:infsem:v:15:y:2017:i:2:d:10.1007_s10257-016-0307-x
    DOI: 10.1007/s10257-016-0307-x
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10257-016-0307-x
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10257-016-0307-x?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Vergidis, K. & Turner, C.J. & Tiwari, A., 2008. "Business process perspectives: Theoretical developments vs. real-world practice," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 114(1), pages 91-104, July.
    2. Ricardo Chalmeta & Reyes Grangel, 2008. "Methodology for the implementation of knowledge management systems," Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 59(5), pages 742-755, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Verónica Pazos & Ricardo Chalmeta, 0. "Reusing enterprise models to build platform independent computer models," Information Systems and e-Business Management, Springer, vol. 0, pages 1-45.
    2. Silvestro, Rhian, 2014. "Performance topology mapping: understanding the drivers of performance," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 156(C), pages 269-282.
    3. Sergio Orenga-Roglá & Ricardo Chalmeta, 2019. "Methodology for the Implementation of Knowledge Management Systems 2.0," Business & Information Systems Engineering: The International Journal of WIRTSCHAFTSINFORMATIK, Springer;Gesellschaft für Informatik e.V. (GI), vol. 61(2), pages 195-213, April.
    4. Bonney, Maurice & Jaber, Mohamad Y., 2014. "Deriving research agendas for manufacturing and logistics systems: A methodology," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 157(C), pages 49-61.
    5. Piotr Senkus & Waldemar Glabiszewski & Aneta Wysokinska-Senkus & Angelika Panka, 2021. "Process Definitions - Critical Literature Review," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(3), pages 241-255.
    6. Vinícius P. Rodrigues & Daniela C. A. Pigosso & Jakob W. Andersen & Tim C. McAloone, 2018. "Evaluating the Potential Business Benefits of Ecodesign Implementation: A Logic Model Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(6), pages 1-26, June.
    7. Céline Averseng, 2011. "How to structure the complexity without giving up the thematic exhaustiveness of a state of the art in management science? Feedback on the methodological contribution of classification tools of qualit," Post-Print hal-01992760, HAL.
    8. Garcia Martin, Patricia Carolina & Schroeder, Andreas & Ziaee Bigdeli, Ali, 2019. "The value architecture of servitization: Expanding the research scope," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 104(C), pages 438-449.
    9. Börner, René & Goeken, Matthias & Rabhi, Fethi, 2012. "SOA development and service identification: A case study on method use, context and success factors," Frankfurt School - Working Paper Series 189, Frankfurt School of Finance and Management.
    10. Tengku Adil Tengku Izhar & Mohd Shamsul Mohd Shoid, 2020. "Ontology Application for the Organizational Goals," International Journal of Human Resource Studies, Macrothink Institute, vol. 10(4), pages 4871-4871, December.
    11. Alicia Martin-Navarro & Maria Paula Lechuga Sancho & Jose Aurelio Medina-Garrido, 2023. "BPMS for management: a systematic literature review," Papers 2312.00442, arXiv.org.
    12. Mingook Lee & Sungjoo Lee, 2016. "Evaluating Internal Technological Capabilities in Energy Companies," Energies, MDPI, vol. 9(3), pages 1-23, March.
    13. Pinheiro de Lima, Edson & Gouvea da Costa, Sergio E. & Angelis, Jannis Jan & Munik, Juliano, 2013. "Performance measurement systems: A consensual analysis of their roles," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 146(2), pages 524-542.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:infsem:v:15:y:2017:i:2:d:10.1007_s10257-016-0307-x. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.