IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/infosf/v20y2018i5d10.1007_s10796-018-9837-8.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Analysis and Early Detection of Rumors in a Post Disaster Scenario

Author

Listed:
  • Tamal Mondal

    (Kalyani Government Engineering College)

  • Prithviraj Pramanik

    (National Institute of Technology Durgapur)

  • Indrajit Bhattacharya

    (Kalyani Government Engineering College)

  • Naiwrita Boral

    (Kalyani Government Engineering College)

  • Saptarshi Ghosh

    (Indian Institute of Technology)

Abstract

The use of online social media for post-disaster situation analysis has recently become popular. However, utilizing information posted on social media has some potential hazards, one of which is rumor. For instance, on Twitter, thousands of verified and non-verified users post tweets to convey information, and not all information posted on Twitter is genuine. Some of them contain fraudulent and unverified information about different facts/incidents - such information are termed as rumors. Identification of such rumor tweets at early stage in the aftermath of a disaster is the main focus of the current work. To this end, a probabilistic model is adopted by combining prominent features of rumor propagation. Each feature has been coded individually in order to extract tweets that have at least one rumor propagation feature. In addition, content-based analysis has been performed to ensure the contribution of the extracted tweets in terms of probability of being a rumor. The proposed model has been tested over a large set of tweets posted during the 2015 Chennai Floods. The proposed model and other four popular baseline rumor detection techniques have been compared with human annotated real rumor data, to check the efficiency of the models in terms of (i) detection of belief rumors and (ii) accuracy at early stage. It has been observed that around 70% of the total endorsed belief rumors have been detected by proposed model, which is superior to other techniques. Finally, in terms of accuracy, the proposed technique also achieved 0.9904 for the considered disaster scenario, which is better than the other methods.

Suggested Citation

  • Tamal Mondal & Prithviraj Pramanik & Indrajit Bhattacharya & Naiwrita Boral & Saptarshi Ghosh, 2018. "Analysis and Early Detection of Rumors in a Post Disaster Scenario," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 20(5), pages 961-979, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:infosf:v:20:y:2018:i:5:d:10.1007_s10796-018-9837-8
    DOI: 10.1007/s10796-018-9837-8
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10796-018-9837-8
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10796-018-9837-8?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Youngseok Choi & Habin Lee, 0. "Data properties and the performance of sentiment classification for electronic commerce applications," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 0, pages 1-20.
    2. Youngseok Choi & Habin Lee, 2017. "Data properties and the performance of sentiment classification for electronic commerce applications," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 19(5), pages 993-1012, October.
    3. Weidong Zhao & Qingfeng Zeng & Guangjian Zheng & Liu Yang, 0. "The resource allocation model for multi-process instances based on particle swarm optimization," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 0, pages 1-10.
    4. Weidong Zhao & Qingfeng Zeng & Guangjian Zheng & Liu Yang, 2017. "The resource allocation model for multi-process instances based on particle swarm optimization," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 19(5), pages 1057-1066, October.
    5. Nekovee, M. & Moreno, Y. & Bianconi, G. & Marsili, M., 2007. "Theory of rumour spreading in complex social networks," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 374(1), pages 457-470.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Jyoti Prakash Singh & Abhinav Kumar & Nripendra P. Rana & Yogesh K. Dwivedi, 2022. "Attention-Based LSTM Network for Rumor Veracity Estimation of Tweets," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 24(2), pages 459-474, April.
    2. Shihang Wang & Zongmin Li & Yuhong Wang & Qi Zhang, 2019. "Machine Learning Methods to Predict Social Media Disaster Rumor Refuters," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(8), pages 1-16, April.
    3. Milad Mirbabaie & Deborah Bunker & Stefan Stieglitz & Annika Deubel, 0. "Who Sets the Tone? Determining the Impact of Convergence Behaviour Archetypes in Social Media Crisis Communication," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 0, pages 1-13.
    4. A. Geethapriya & S. Valli, 2021. "An Enhanced Approach to Map Domain-Specific Words in Cross-Domain Sentiment Analysis," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 23(3), pages 791-805, June.
    5. Milad Mirbabaie & Deborah Bunker & Stefan Stieglitz & Annika Deubel, 2020. "Who Sets the Tone? Determining the Impact of Convergence Behaviour Archetypes in Social Media Crisis Communication," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 22(2), pages 339-351, April.
    6. Shalak Mendon & Pankaj Dutta & Abhishek Behl & Stefan Lessmann, 2021. "A Hybrid Approach of Machine Learning and Lexicons to Sentiment Analysis: Enhanced Insights from Twitter Data of Natural Disasters," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 23(5), pages 1145-1168, September.
    7. Bin Xia & Yuxuan Bai & Junjie Yin & Yun Li & Jian Xu, 0. "LogGAN: a Log-level Generative Adversarial Network for Anomaly Detection using Permutation Event Modeling," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 0, pages 1-14.
    8. Zu, Xu & Diao, Xinyi & Meng, Zhiyi, 2019. "The impact of social media input intensity on firm performance: Evidence from Sina Weibo," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 536(C).
    9. Bin Xia & Yuxuan Bai & Junjie Yin & Yun Li & Jian Xu, 2021. "LogGAN: a Log-level Generative Adversarial Network for Anomaly Detection using Permutation Event Modeling," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 23(2), pages 285-298, April.
    10. Saptarshi Ghosh & Kripabandhu Ghosh & Debasis Ganguly & Tanmoy Chakraborty & Gareth J. F. Jones & Marie-Francine Moens & Muhammad Imran, 2018. "Exploitation of Social Media for Emergency Relief and Preparedness: Recent Research and Trends," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 20(5), pages 901-907, October.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Vijayan Sugumaran & T. V. Geetha & D. Manjula & Hema Gopal, 2017. "Guest Editorial: Computational Intelligence and Applications," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 19(5), pages 969-974, October.
    2. Luvai Motiwalla & Amit V. Deokar & Surendra Sarnikar & Angelika Dimoka, 2019. "Leveraging Data Analytics for Behavioral Research," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 21(4), pages 735-742, August.
    3. Wei-Lun Chang & Yi-Pei Chen, 2019. "Way too sentimental? a credible model for online reviews," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 21(2), pages 453-468, April.
    4. A. Geethapriya & S. Valli, 2021. "An Enhanced Approach to Map Domain-Specific Words in Cross-Domain Sentiment Analysis," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 23(3), pages 791-805, June.
    5. Huo, Liang’an & Chen, Sijing, 2020. "Rumor propagation model with consideration of scientific knowledge level and social reinforcement in heterogeneous network," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 559(C).
    6. Li, Dandan & Ma, Jing, 2017. "How the government’s punishment and individual’s sensitivity affect the rumor spreading in online social networks," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 469(C), pages 284-292.
    7. Hosni, Adil Imad Eddine & Li, Kan & Ahmad, Sadique, 2020. "Analysis of the impact of online social networks addiction on the propagation of rumors," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 542(C).
    8. Jia, Pingqi & Wang, Chao & Zhang, Gaoyu & Ma, Jianfeng, 2019. "A rumor spreading model based on two propagation channels in social networks," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 524(C), pages 342-353.
    9. Wang, Xiaojie & Zhang, Xue & Zhao, Chengli & Yi, Dongyun, 2018. "Effectively identifying multiple influential spreaders in term of the backward–forward propagation," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 512(C), pages 404-413.
    10. Liang’an Huo & Fan Ding & Chen Liu & Yingying Cheng, 2018. "Dynamical Analysis of Rumor Spreading Model considering Node Activity in Complex Networks," Complexity, Hindawi, vol. 2018, pages 1-10, November.
    11. Xuefeng Yue & Liangan Huo, 2022. "Analysis of the Stability and Optimal Control Strategy for an ISCR Rumor Propagation Model with Saturated Incidence and Time Delay on a Scale-Free Network," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 10(20), pages 1-20, October.
    12. Zan, Yongli & Wu, Jianliang & Li, Ping & Yu, Qinglin, 2014. "SICR rumor spreading model in complex networks: Counterattack and self-resistance," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 405(C), pages 159-170.
    13. Zhang, Yaming & Su, Yanyuan & Weigang, Li & Liu, Haiou, 2019. "Interacting model of rumor propagation and behavior spreading in multiplex networks," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 121(C), pages 168-177.
    14. Zhao, Laijun & Qiu, Xiaoyan & Wang, Xiaoli & Wang, Jiajia, 2013. "Rumor spreading model considering forgetting and remembering mechanisms in inhomogeneous networks," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 392(4), pages 987-994.
    15. Fink, Christian G. & Fullin, Kelly & Gutierrez, Guillermo & Omodt, Nathan & Zinnecker, Sydney & Sprint, Gina & McCulloch, Sean, 2023. "A centrality measure for quantifying spread on weighted, directed networks," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 626(C).
    16. Jianhong Chen & Hongcai Ma & Shan Yang, 2023. "SEIOR Rumor Propagation Model Considering Hesitating Mechanism and Different Rumor-Refuting Ways in Complex Networks," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 11(2), pages 1-22, January.
    17. Marco Bardoscia & Fabio Caccioli & Juan Ignacio Perotti & Gianna Vivaldo & Guido Caldarelli, 2016. "Distress Propagation in Complex Networks: The Case of Non-Linear DebtRank," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(10), pages 1-12, October.
    18. Zhu, He & Ma, Jing, 2019. "Analysis of SHIR rumor propagation in random heterogeneous networks with dynamic friendships," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 513(C), pages 257-271.
    19. Ran, Maojie & Chen, Jiancu, 2021. "An information dissemination model based on positive and negative interference in social networks," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 572(C).
    20. Yao, Yao & Xiao, Xi & Zhang, Chengping & Dou, Changsheng & Xia, Shutao, 2019. "Stability analysis of an SDILR model based on rumor recurrence on social media," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 535(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:infosf:v:20:y:2018:i:5:d:10.1007_s10796-018-9837-8. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.