IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/infosf/v19y2017i1d10.1007_s10796-015-9595-9.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

OptiPres: a distributed mobile agent decision support system for optimal patient drug prescription

Author

Listed:
  • Kevin Miller

    (The University of the West Indies)

  • Gunjan Mansingh

    (The University of the West Indies)

Abstract

Prescribing the right drugs for a patient is a difficult task that takes into consideration several factors. The Institute of Medicine (IOM), U.S.A., has reported based on two major studies (1999–2001 & 2006) that prescribing the wrong medication is a big problem, and the effects can sometimes be fatal. To address this problem, we designed and implemented, a distributed intelligent mobile agent-based system by the name, OptiPres. This system will be used by doctors on their smart phones while prescribing medicines. It will assist them in making more informed decisions by either choosing the optimal solution from processing a repository of past decisions or by presenting a set of possible drugs and using criteria specified by them to identify the optimal drug. The evaluation of OptiPres was done by comparing its recommended outcome of three predefined medical scenarios against the recommendations from a group of doctors and the World Health Organization (WHO) manual entitled:‘Guide to Good Prescribing’. The results indicate that OptiPres is effective in prescribing optimal drugs and in reducing the cognitive burden on doctors, especially in subjective decision making contexts where they have to consider multiple parameters.

Suggested Citation

  • Kevin Miller & Gunjan Mansingh, 2017. "OptiPres: a distributed mobile agent decision support system for optimal patient drug prescription," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 19(1), pages 129-148, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:infosf:v:19:y:2017:i:1:d:10.1007_s10796-015-9595-9
    DOI: 10.1007/s10796-015-9595-9
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10796-015-9595-9
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10796-015-9595-9?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Adler-Milstein, Julia & Bates, David W., 2010. "Paperless healthcare: Progress and challenges of an IT-enabled healthcare system," Business Horizons, Elsevier, vol. 53(2), pages 119-130, March.
    2. Ravi Aron & Shantanu Dutta & Ramkumar Janakiraman & Praveen A. Pathak, 2011. "The Impact of Automation of Systems on Medical Errors: Evidence from Field Research," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 22(3), pages 429-446, September.
    3. Osei-Bryson, Kweku-Muata, 2006. "An action learning approach for assessing the consistency of pairwise comparison data," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 174(1), pages 234-244, October.
    4. ., 1994. "Atomism and Organicism," Chapters, in: Geoffrey M. Hodgson & Warren J. Samuels & Marc R. Tool (ed.), The Elgar Companion to Institutional and Evolutionary Economics, volume 0, chapter 4, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    5. Alessio Ishizaka & Markus Lusti, 2006. "How to derive priorities in AHP: a comparative study," Central European Journal of Operations Research, Springer;Slovak Society for Operations Research;Hungarian Operational Research Society;Czech Society for Operations Research;Österr. Gesellschaft für Operations Research (ÖGOR);Slovenian Society Informatika - Section for Operational Research;Croatian Operational Research Society, vol. 14(4), pages 387-400, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Sergey Motorny & Surendra Sarnikar & Cherie Noteboom, 2022. "Design of an Intelligent Patient Decision aid Based on Individual Decision-Making Styles and Information Need Preferences," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 24(4), pages 1249-1264, August.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Bice Cavallo, 2019. "Coherent weights for pairwise comparison matrices and a mixed-integer linear programming problem," Journal of Global Optimization, Springer, vol. 75(1), pages 143-161, September.
    2. Siliang Tong & Nan Jia & Xueming Luo & Zheng Fang, 2021. "The Janus face of artificial intelligence feedback: Deployment versus disclosure effects on employee performance," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 42(9), pages 1600-1631, September.
    3. Katherine James & Jaymie Meliker, 2013. "Environmental cadmium exposure and osteoporosis: a review," International Journal of Public Health, Springer;Swiss School of Public Health (SSPH+), vol. 58(5), pages 737-745, October.
    4. Hemant K. Bhargava & Abhay Nath Mishra, 2014. "Electronic Medical Records and Physician Productivity: Evidence from Panel Data Analysis," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 60(10), pages 2543-2562, October.
    5. Ari Bronsoler & John Van Reenen & Joseph Doyle, 2022. "The Impact of Health Information and Communication Technology on Clinical Quality, Productivity, and Workers," Annual Review of Economics, Annual Reviews, vol. 14(1), pages 23-46, August.
    6. Li, Yunjian & Song, Yixiao & Sun, Yanming & Zeng, Mingzhuo, 2024. "When do employees learn from artificial intelligence? The moderating effects of perceived enjoyment and task-related complexity," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 77(C).
    7. Gerda Ana Melnik-Leroy & Gintautas Dzemyda, 2021. "How to Influence the Results of MCDM?—Evidence of the Impact of Cognitive Biases," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 9(2), pages 1-25, January.
    8. Daniel Gartner & Yiye Zhang & Rema Padman, 2018. "Cognitive workload reduction in hospital information systems," Health Care Management Science, Springer, vol. 21(2), pages 224-243, June.
    9. Kweku-Muata Osei-Bryson, 2015. "A hybrid decision support framework for generating & selecting causal explanatory regression splines models for information systems research," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 17(4), pages 845-856, August.
    10. Jan A. Kempkes & Francesco Suprano & Andreas Wömpener, 2024. "How management support systems affect job performance: a systematic literature review and research agenda," Management Review Quarterly, Springer, vol. 74(4), pages 2013-2086, December.
    11. Corrente, Salvatore & Greco, Salvatore & Ishizaka, Alessio, 2016. "Combining analytical hierarchy process and Choquet integral within non-additive robust ordinal regression," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 61(C), pages 2-18.
    12. Chin-Yi Chen & Jih-Jeng Huang, 2019. "Deriving Fuzzy Weights of the Fuzzy Analytic Network Process via Fuzzy Inverse Matrix," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 7(10), pages 1-14, October.
    13. Jiří Mazurek, 2018. "Some notes on the properties of inconsistency indices in pairwise comparisons," Operations Research and Decisions, Wroclaw University of Science and Technology, Faculty of Management, vol. 28(1), pages 27-42.
    14. Itzel Inti Maria Donati & Davide Viaggi & Zorica Srdjevic & Bojan Srdjevic & Antonella Di Fonzo & Teresa Del Giudice & Orlando Cimino & Andrea Martelli & Anna Dalla Marta & Roberto Henke & Filiberto A, 2023. "An Analysis of Preference Weights and Setting Priorities by Irrigation Advisory Services Users Based on the Analytic Hierarchy Process," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 13(8), pages 1-15, August.
    15. Konrad Kułakowski & Katarzyna Grobler-Dębska & Jarosław Wąs, 2015. "Heuristic rating estimation: geometric approach," Journal of Global Optimization, Springer, vol. 62(3), pages 529-543, July.
    16. A Ishizaka & D Balkenborg & T Kaplan, 2011. "Influence of aggregation and measurement scale on ranking a compromise alternative in AHP," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 62(4), pages 700-710, April.
    17. Ching-Sung Lee & Yen-Cheng Chen & Pei-Ling Tsui & Ming-Chen Chiang, 2022. "Diversified and Sustainable Business Strategy of Smallholder Farmers in the Suburbs of Taiwan," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 12(6), pages 1-14, May.
    18. Muhammad Zia Hydari & Rahul Telang & William M. Marella, 2019. "Saving Patient Ryan—Can Advanced Electronic Medical Records Make Patient Care Safer?," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 67(5), pages 2041-2059, May.
    19. Nikolai Krivulin & Alexey Prinkov & Igor Gladkikh, 2022. "Using Pairwise Comparisons to Determine Consumer Preferences in Hotel Selection," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 10(5), pages 1-25, February.
    20. Erdem Dogukan Yilmaz & Christian Peukert, 2024. "Who Benefits from AI? Project-Level Evidence on Labor Demand, Operations and Profitability," CESifo Working Paper Series 11321, CESifo.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:infosf:v:19:y:2017:i:1:d:10.1007_s10796-015-9595-9. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.