IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/infosf/v15y2013i3d10.1007_s10796-012-9398-1.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A multidimensional data model using the fuzzy model based on the semantic translation

Author

Listed:
  • Ramón A. Carrasco

    (University of Granada)

  • Francisco Muñoz-Leiva

    (University of Granada)

  • Miguel J. Hornos

    (University of Granada)

Abstract

With the rapid development of Web 2.0 sites such as Blogs and Wikis users are encouraged to express opinions about certain products, services or social topics over the web. There is a method for aggregating these opinions, called Opinion Aggregation, which is made up of four steps: Collect, Identify, Classify and Aggregate. In this paper, we present a new conceptual multidimensional data model based on the Fuzzy Model based on the Semantic Translation to solve the Aggregate step of an Opinion Aggregation architecture, which allows exploiting the measure values resulting from integrating heterogeneous information (including unstructured data such as free texts) by means of traditional Business Intelligence tools. We also present an entire Opinion Aggregation architecture that includes the Aggregate step and solves the rest of steps (Collect, Identify and Classify) by means an Extraction, Transformation and Loading process. This architecture has been implemented in an Oracle Relational Database Management System. We have applied it to integrate heterogeneous data extracted from certain high end hotels websites, and we show a case study using the collected data during several years in the websites of high end hotels located in Granada (Spain). With this integrated information, the Data Warehouse user can make several analyses with the benefit of an easy linguistic interpretability and a high precision by means of interactive tools such as the dashboards.

Suggested Citation

  • Ramón A. Carrasco & Francisco Muñoz-Leiva & Miguel J. Hornos, 2013. "A multidimensional data model using the fuzzy model based on the semantic translation," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 15(3), pages 351-370, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:infosf:v:15:y:2013:i:3:d:10.1007_s10796-012-9398-1
    DOI: 10.1007/s10796-012-9398-1
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10796-012-9398-1
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10796-012-9398-1?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jia Zhang & Karthik Akula & Momtazul Karim & Raghu Kumar Reddy Ariga, 2011. "A university-oriented Web 2.0 services portal," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 13(2), pages 251-264, April.
    2. Chiou, Hua-Kai & Tzeng, Gwo-Hshiung & Cheng, Ding-Chou, 2005. "Evaluating sustainable fishing development strategies using fuzzy MCDM approach," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 33(3), pages 223-234, June.
    3. Minhong Wang, 2011. "Integrating organizational, social, and individual perspectives in Web 2.0-based workplace e-learning," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 13(2), pages 191-205, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Malu Castellanos & Florian Daniel & Irene Garrigós & Jose-Norberto Mazón, 2013. "Business Intelligence and the Web," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 15(3), pages 307-309, July.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Chulhwan Chris Bang, 2015. "Information systems frontiers: Keyword analysis and classification," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 17(1), pages 217-237, February.
    2. Zhang, XiaoLi & Liu, ChenGuang & Li, WenJuan & Evans, Steve & Yin, Yong, 2017. "Effects of key enabling technologies for seru production on sustainable performance," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 66(PB), pages 290-307.
    3. Wanke, Peter Fernandes & Chiappetta Jabbour, Charbel José & Moreira Antunes, Jorge Junio & Lopes de Sousa Jabbour, Ana Beatriz & Roubaud, David & Sobreiro, Vinicius Amorim & Santibanez Gonzalez‬, Erne, 2021. "An original information entropy-based quantitative evaluation model for low-carbon operations in an emerging market," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 234(C).
    4. James Liou & Mei-Ling Chuang, 2010. "Evaluating corporate image and reputation using fuzzy MCDM approach in airline market," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 44(6), pages 1079-1091, October.
    5. Víctor Jesus García-Morales & Rodrigo Martín-Rojas & Raquel Garde-Sánchez, 2020. "How to Encourage Social Entrepreneurship Action? Using Web 2.0 Technologies in Higher Education Institutions," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 161(2), pages 329-350, January.
    6. Dmytro Babik & Rahul Singh & Xia Zhao & Eric W. Ford, 2017. "What you think and what I think: Studying intersubjectivity in knowledge artifacts evaluation," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 19(1), pages 31-56, February.
    7. Hatami-Marbini, Adel & Emrouznejad, Ali & Tavana, Madjid, 2011. "A taxonomy and review of the fuzzy data envelopment analysis literature: Two decades in the making," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 214(3), pages 457-472, November.
    8. Tseng, Fang-Mei & Chiu, Yu-Jing & Chen, Ja-Shen, 2009. "Measuring business performance in the high-tech manufacturing industry: A case study of Taiwan's large-sized TFT-LCD panel companies," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 37(3), pages 686-697, June.
    9. Aikaterini Papapostolou & Charikleia Karakosta & Kalliopi-Anastasia Kourti & Haris Doukas & John Psarras, 2019. "Supporting Europe’s Energy Policy Towards a Decarbonised Energy System: A Comparative Assessment," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(15), pages 1-26, July.
    10. Padmanathan K. & Uma Govindarajan & Vigna K. Ramachandaramurthy & Sudar Oli Selvi T., 2017. "Multiple Criteria Decision Making (MCDM) Based Economic Analysis of Solar PV System with Respect to Performance Investigation for Indian Market," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(5), pages 1-19, May.
    11. I-Ching Hsu, 2013. "Personalized web feeds based on ontology technologies," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 15(3), pages 465-479, July.
    12. Chan, Felix T.S. & Kumar, Niraj, 2007. "Global supplier development considering risk factors using fuzzy extended AHP-based approach," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 35(4), pages 417-431, August.
    13. Jiménez, Antonio & Mateos, Alfonso & Ríos-Insua, Sixto, 2009. "Missing consequences in multiattribute utility theory," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 37(2), pages 395-410, April.
    14. Lahdelma, Risto & Makkonen, Simo & Salminen, Pekka, 2009. "Two ways to handle dependent uncertainties in multi-criteria decision problems," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 37(1), pages 79-92, February.
    15. Yen-Ching Chuang & Shu-Kung Hu & James J. H. Liou & Huai-Wei Lo, 2018. "Building a Decision Dashboard for Improving Green Supply Chain Management," International Journal of Information Technology & Decision Making (IJITDM), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 17(05), pages 1363-1398, September.
    16. Jiménez, Antonio & Mateos, Alfonso & Sabio, Pilar, 2013. "Dominance intensity measure within fuzzy weight oriented MAUT: An application," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 41(2), pages 397-405.
    17. Rakesh Raut & Naoufel Cheikhrouhou & Manoj Kharat, 2017. "Sustainability in The Banking Industry: A Strategic Multi‐Criterion Analysis," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 26(4), pages 550-568, May.
    18. Yavuz Ozdemir & Sahika Ozdemir, 2019. "Residential heating system selection using the generalized Choquet integral method with the perspective of energy," Energy & Environment, , vol. 30(1), pages 121-140, February.
    19. Thompson S. H. Teo & Sojung Lucia Kim & Li Jiang, 2020. "E-Learning Implementation in South Korea: Integrating Effectiveness and Legitimacy Perspectives," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 22(2), pages 511-528, April.
    20. Yavuz Ozdemir & Sahika Ozdemir, 2019. "Extended prioritizing of store plan alternatives produced with shape grammar using the generalized Choquet integral method," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 46(5), pages 931-947, June.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:infosf:v:15:y:2013:i:3:d:10.1007_s10796-012-9398-1. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.