IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/ijsaem/v8y2017i2d10.1007_s13198-016-0559-3.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

An evaluation of maintenance practices in Kenya: preliminary results

Author

Listed:
  • A. K. Muchiri

    (Jomo Kenyatta University of Agriculture and Technology)

  • B. W. Ikua

    (Jomo Kenyatta University of Agriculture and Technology)

  • P. N. Muchiri

    (Dedan Kimathi University of Technology)

  • P. K. Irungu

    (Dedan Kimathi University of Technology)

  • K. Kibicho

    (Jomo Kenyatta University of Agriculture and Technology)

Abstract

Over time, the definition of maintenance has evolved from activities meant to keep equipment in an operable condition, to a set of activities required to keep the means of production in the desired operating conditions or to restore them to this condition. Further, all those systematic activities geared towards the actual execution and improvement of maintenance are referred to as maintenance practices. There is a general assumption that maintenance practices in the developing world are below standard, when compared to what happens in the developed world. However, this is not a fact that has been determined empirically, but rather a perception. This paper presents the results of an assessment of maintenance practices in Kenyan industries, using a maintenance practices evaluation tool. The analysis provides a critical overview of the current status of maintenance practices, and shows how these maintenance practices compare with the best practices globally. Research was carried out through a survey, using a questionnaire developed to establish the maintenance practices in a number of Kenyan companies. The survey clustered industries into different categories, namely, service, power generation, food manufacturing and processing, agro/chemical, metal processing, motor vehicle assemblers, transport, maintenance and construction industries. The responses from the survey were analyzed using three aspects of maintenance practices, namely, technical, managerial and human aspects. For each of these aspects, an evaluation index was developed and calculated. Subsequently, the general evaluation index was determined. This index showed that Kenyan companies are at the managed level of maintenance practices, where processes are partially planned, and performance depends on the operators’ experience and competence. It is recommended that Kenyan companies should aim at improving the index to the highest level, namely the optimizing stage, by focusing more on improvements in the technical aspects of maintenance.

Suggested Citation

  • A. K. Muchiri & B. W. Ikua & P. N. Muchiri & P. K. Irungu & K. Kibicho, 2017. "An evaluation of maintenance practices in Kenya: preliminary results," International Journal of System Assurance Engineering and Management, Springer;The Society for Reliability, Engineering Quality and Operations Management (SREQOM),India, and Division of Operation and Maintenance, Lulea University of Technology, Sweden, vol. 8(2), pages 990-1007, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:ijsaem:v:8:y:2017:i:2:d:10.1007_s13198-016-0559-3
    DOI: 10.1007/s13198-016-0559-3
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s13198-016-0559-3
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s13198-016-0559-3?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Pinjala, Srinivas Kumar & Pintelon, Liliane & Vereecke, Ann, 2006. "An empirical investigation on the relationship between business and maintenance strategies," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 104(1), pages 214-229, November.
    2. Zio, Enrico & Compare, Michele, 2013. "Evaluating maintenance policies by quantitative modeling and analysis," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 109(C), pages 53-65.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Asadzadeh, S.M. & Azadeh, A., 2014. "An integrated systemic model for optimization of condition-based maintenance with human error," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 124(C), pages 117-131.
    2. Michele Compare & Francesco Di Maio & Enrico Zio & Fausto Carlevaro & Sara Mattafirri, 2016. "Improving scheduled maintenance by missing data reconstruction: A double-loop Monte Carlo approach," Journal of Risk and Reliability, , vol. 230(5), pages 502-511, October.
    3. Hamzeh Soltanali & Mehdi Khojastehpour & Siamak Kheybari, 2023. "Evaluating the critical success factors for maintenance management in agro-industries using multi-criteria decision-making techniques," Operations Management Research, Springer, vol. 16(2), pages 949-968, June.
    4. Michele Compare & Paolo Marelli & Piero Baraldi & Enrico Zio, 2018. "A Markov decision process framework for optimal operation of monitored multi-state systems," Journal of Risk and Reliability, , vol. 232(6), pages 677-689, December.
    5. Lin, Boliang & Zhao, Yinan, 2021. "Synchronized optimization of EMU train assignment and second-level preventive maintenance scheduling," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 215(C).
    6. Faccio, M. & Persona, A. & Sgarbossa, F. & Zanin, G., 2014. "Industrial maintenance policy development: A quantitative framework," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 147(PA), pages 85-93.
    7. de Jonge, Bram & Teunter, Ruud & Tinga, Tiedo, 2017. "The influence of practical factors on the benefits of condition-based maintenance over time-based maintenance," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 158(C), pages 21-30.
    8. Muchiri, Peter & Pintelon, Liliane & Gelders, Ludo & Martin, Harry, 2011. "Development of maintenance function performance measurement framework and indicators," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 131(1), pages 295-302, May.
    9. Janak Priyantha, 2021. "Literature Review: The Role of Organizational Factors in Maintenance Organizations Affecting Their Manufacturing Performance, From Sri Lankan Cultural Perspective," International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science (IJRISS), vol. 5(4), pages 353-366, April.
    10. Francesco Cannarile & Michele Compare & Francesco Di Maio & Enrico Zio, 2018. "A clustering approach for mining reliability big data for asset management," Journal of Risk and Reliability, , vol. 232(2), pages 140-150, April.
    11. Compare, Michele & Bellani, Luca & Zio, Enrico, 2017. "Reliability model of a component equipped with PHM capabilities," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 168(C), pages 4-11.
    12. Azadeh, A. & Asadzadeh, S.M. & Salehi, N. & Firoozi, M., 2015. "Condition-based maintenance effectiveness for series–parallel power generation system—A combined Markovian simulation model," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 142(C), pages 357-368.
    13. Carpitella, Silvia & Mzougui, Ilyas & Benítez, Julio & Carpitella, Fortunato & Certa, Antonella & Izquierdo, Joaquín & La Cascia, Marco, 2021. "A risk evaluation framework for the best maintenance strategy: The case of a marine salt manufacture firm," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 205(C).
    14. Cipollini, Francesca & Oneto, Luca & Coraddu, Andrea & Murphy, Alan John & Anguita, Davide, 2018. "Condition-based maintenance of naval propulsion systems: Data analysis with minimal feedback," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 177(C), pages 12-23.
    15. Yang, Zhe & Baraldi, Piero & Zio, Enrico, 2020. "A novel method for maintenance record clustering and its application to a case study of maintenance optimization," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 203(C).
    16. Alsyouf, Imad, 2009. "Maintenance practices in Swedish industries: Survey results," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 121(1), pages 212-223, September.
    17. Naseri, Masoud & Baraldi, Piero & Compare, Michele & Zio, Enrico, 2016. "Availability assessment of oil and gas processing plants operating under dynamic Arctic weather conditions," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 152(C), pages 66-82.
    18. García Alcaraz Jorge Luis & Romero González Jaime & Noriega Morales Salvador, 2012. "El éxito del mantenimiento productivo total y su relación con los factores administrativos," Contaduría y Administración, Accounting and Management, vol. 57(4), pages 173-196, octubre-d.
    19. Traore, M. & Chammas, A. & Duviella, E., 2015. "Supervision and prognosis architecture based on dynamical classification method for the predictive maintenance of dynamical evolving systems," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 136(C), pages 120-131.
    20. Yang Li & Qirong Tang & Qing Chang & Michael P. Brundage, 2017. "An event-based analysis of condition-based maintenance decision-making in multistage production systems," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 55(16), pages 4753-4764, August.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:ijsaem:v:8:y:2017:i:2:d:10.1007_s13198-016-0559-3. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.