IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/ijsaem/v15y2024i6d10.1007_s13198-024-02263-5.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Ranking of components for reliability estimation of CBSS: an application of entropy weight fuzzy comprehensive evaluation model

Author

Listed:
  • Zeeshan Ali Siddiqui

    (Integral University)

  • Mohd. Haroon

    (Integral University)

Abstract

The methodology of component-based software development, or CBSD, depends heavily on the reliability of its components. The reliability assessment of software components is currently the most common and significant problem in CBSS. The components chosen for integration from a variety of comparable functionally qualified components offered by multiple service providers in the market play an essential role in the reliability of the CBSS. As a result, the most reliable component must be chosen while considering the users’ business needs and budget. To estimate the reliability of software components, this study uses an alternative method known as an information entropy weight (IEW) fuzzy comprehensive evaluation model (FCEM) to rank the components based on their performance index. A case study is discussed to validate the results, and IEW FCEM is compared with fuzzy MOORA, fuzzy TOPSIS, CoCoSo, and FCEM-MULTIMOORA-FG methods. According to the results, components A8, or “Devices,” will significantly influence estimating the system’s overall reliability. On the other hand, option A2, which refers to the “Server” component, would have the least. The simulation results demonstrate that the suggested approach has better position accuracy than previous algorithms and is easier to implement in a computer system due to its simple and logical basic idea and computational simplicity.

Suggested Citation

  • Zeeshan Ali Siddiqui & Mohd. Haroon, 2024. "Ranking of components for reliability estimation of CBSS: an application of entropy weight fuzzy comprehensive evaluation model," International Journal of System Assurance Engineering and Management, Springer;The Society for Reliability, Engineering Quality and Operations Management (SREQOM),India, and Division of Operation and Maintenance, Lulea University of Technology, Sweden, vol. 15(6), pages 2438-2452, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:ijsaem:v:15:y:2024:i:6:d:10.1007_s13198-024-02263-5
    DOI: 10.1007/s13198-024-02263-5
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s13198-024-02263-5
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s13198-024-02263-5?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Pi-Fang Hsu & Mei-Ghing Hsu, 2008. "Optimizing the Information Outsourcing Practices of Primary Care Medical Organizations Using Entropy and TOPSIS," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 42(2), pages 181-201, April.
    2. Ankur Choudhary & Anurag Singh Baghel & Om Prakash Sangwan, 2017. "An efficient parameter estimation of software reliability growth models using gravitational search algorithm," International Journal of System Assurance Engineering and Management, Springer;The Society for Reliability, Engineering Quality and Operations Management (SREQOM),India, and Division of Operation and Maintenance, Lulea University of Technology, Sweden, vol. 8(1), pages 79-88, March.
    3. B. Littlewood, 1975. "A Reliability Model for Systems with Markov Structure," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series C, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 24(2), pages 172-177, June.
    4. Xuedong Liang & Dongyang Si & Jing Xu, 2018. "Quantitative Evaluation of the Sustainable Development Capacity of Hydropower in China Based on Information Entropy," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(2), pages 1-18, February.
    5. Morteza Yazdani & Pascale Zaraté & Edmundas Kazimieras Zavadskas & Zenonas Turskis, 2019. "A Combined Compromise Solution (CoCoSo) method for multi-criteria decision-making problems," Post-Print hal-02879091, HAL.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Željko Stević & Dillip Kumar Das & Rade Tešić & Marijo Vidas & Dragan Vojinović, 2022. "Objective Criticism and Negative Conclusions on Using the Fuzzy SWARA Method in Multi-Criteria Decision Making," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 10(4), pages 1-19, February.
    2. Sood, Kirti & Singh, Simarjeet & Behl, Abhishek & Sindhwani, Rahul & Kaur, Sandeepa & Pereira, Vijay, 2023. "Identification and prioritization of the risks in the mass adoption of artificial intelligence-driven stable coins: The quest for optimal resource utilization," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 81(C).
    3. Raghunathan Krishankumar & Arunodaya Raj Mishra & Pratibha Rani & Fausto Cavallaro & Kattur Soundarapandian Ravichandran, 2023. "A Novel Integrated q-Rung Fuzzy Framework for Biomass Location Selection with No Apriori Weight Choices," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-21, February.
    4. Arunodaya Raj Mishra & Pratibha Rani & Raghunathan Krishankumar & Edmundas Kazimieras Zavadskas & Fausto Cavallaro & Kattur S. Ravichandran, 2021. "A Hesitant Fuzzy Combined Compromise Solution Framework-Based on Discrimination Measure for Ranking Sustainable Third-Party Reverse Logistic Providers," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-24, February.
    5. Nadine Kafa & Anicia Jaegler & Joseph Sarkis, 2020. "Harnessing Corporate Sustainability Decision-Making Complexity: A Field Study of Complementary Approaches," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(24), pages 1-23, December.
    6. Gran, Bjørn Axel & Fredriksen, Rune & Thunem, Atoosa P.-J., 2007. "Addressing dependability by applying an approach for model-based risk assessment," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 92(11), pages 1492-1502.
    7. Torkayesh, Ali Ebadi & Alizadeh, Reza & Soltanisehat, Leili & Torkayesh, Sajjad Ebadi & Lund, Peter D., 2022. "A comparative assessment of air quality across European countries using an integrated decision support model," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 81(C).
    8. Sindhwani, Rahul & Afridi, Shayan & Kumar, Anil & Banaitis, Audrius & Luthra, Sunil & Singh, Punj Lata, 2022. "Can industry 5.0 revolutionize the wave of resilience and social value creation? A multi-criteria framework to analyze enablers," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 68(C).
    9. Seyed Hossein Razavi Hajiagha & Jalil Heidary-Dahooie & Ieva Meidutė-Kavaliauskienė & Kannan Govindan, 2022. "A new dynamic multi-attribute decision making method based on Markov chain and linear assignment," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 315(1), pages 159-191, August.
    10. Zifeng Liang & Manli Zhang & Qingduo Mao & Bingxin Yu & Ben Ma, 2018. "Improvement of Eco-Efficiency in China: A Comparison of Mandatory and Hybrid Environmental Policy Instruments," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 15(7), pages 1-20, July.
    11. Tanrıverdi, Gökhan & Merkert, Rico & Karamaşa, Çağlar & Asker, Veysi, 2023. "Using multi-criteria performance measurement models to evaluate the financial, operational and environmental sustainability of airlines," Journal of Air Transport Management, Elsevier, vol. 112(C).
    12. Miguel Ortíz-Barrios & Natalia Jaramillo-Rueda & Muhammet Gul & Melih Yucesan & Genett Jiménez-Delgado & Juan-José Alfaro-Saíz, 2023. "A Fuzzy Hybrid MCDM Approach for Assessing the Emergency Department Performance during the COVID-19 Outbreak," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(5), pages 1-39, March.
    13. Željko Stević & Nikola Brković, 2020. "A Novel Integrated FUCOM-MARCOS Model for Evaluation of Human Resources in a Transport Company," Logistics, MDPI, vol. 4(1), pages 1-14, February.
    14. Abduallah Gamal & Mohamed Abdel-Basset & Ibrahim M. Hezam & Karam M. Sallam & Ibrahim A. Hameed, 2023. "An Interactive Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Approach for Autonomous Vehicles and Distributed Resources Based on Logistic Systems: Challenges for a Sustainable Future," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(17), pages 1-26, August.
    15. Nima Pourmohammadreza & Mohammad Reza Akbari Jokar, 2023. "A Novel Two-Phase Approach for Optimization of the Last-Mile Delivery Problem with Service Options," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(10), pages 1-25, May.
    16. A. Azadeh & M. Ameli & N. Alisoltani & S. Motevali Haghighi, 2016. "A unique fuzzy multi-control approach for continuous quality improvement in a radio therapy department," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 50(6), pages 2469-2493, November.
    17. Nguyen Van Thanh, 2022. "Optimal Waste-to-Energy Strategy Assisted by Fuzzy MCDM Model for Sustainable Solid Waste Management," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(11), pages 1-13, May.
    18. Vahideh Eslami & Parisa-Sadat Ashofteh & Parvin Golfam & Hugo A. Loáiciga, 2021. "Multi-criteria Decision-making Approach for Environmental Impact Assessment to Reduce the Adverse Effects Of Dams," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 35(12), pages 4085-4110, September.
    19. Alptekin Ulutaş & Darjan Karabasevic & Gabrijela Popovic & Dragisa Stanujkic & Phong Thanh Nguyen & Çağatay Karaköy, 2020. "Development of a Novel Integrated CCSD-ITARA-MARCOS Decision-Making Approach for Stackers Selection in a Logistics System," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 8(10), pages 1-15, October.
    20. Shupeng Huang & Hong Cheng & Manyi Tan & Zhiqing Tang & Chuyi Teng, 2024. "Evaluating Regional Potentials of Agricultural E-Commerce Development Using a Novel MEREC Heronian-CoCoSo Approach," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 14(8), pages 1-16, August.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:ijsaem:v:15:y:2024:i:6:d:10.1007_s13198-024-02263-5. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.