IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/ijsaem/v15y2024i10d10.1007_s13198-024-02389-6.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Solution of a single-objective based three-stage 4DTP model with information crowdsourcing under disaster relief scenario: a hybrid random type-2 fuzzy approach

Author

Listed:
  • Palash Sahoo

    (Calcutta Institute of Technology)

Abstract

In the event of any type of disaster or emergency, quick action is required to save lives, meet the basic human needs of the affected population, and reduce the amount of damage. In this situation, national organizations, local organizations, or international organizations should participate in providing assistance as soon as possible. However, priority should be given to local agencies in providing assistance as they are more familiar with the geographical location of the affected areas. Effective coordination efforts are most beneficial and important in disaster relief. Again, certain local organizations have high demand but limited resources. In this situation, organizations have great difficulty in optimally allocating resources. The problematic fact is addressed in this essay by proposing the idea of demands-based priority measures. A mechanism is introduced to determine the priority factor’s numerical value by employing information crowdsourcing to gather responses regarding the need for relief supplies. In this context, under the hybrid random type-2 fuzzy environment a three-stage 4DTP model is developed where the local organizations fulfill the demand with the highest priority in Stage-I, the other international or national organizations fulfill the remaining demand in Stage-II, and local organizations are restored in Stage-III. In our proposed model, all constraints and all objective functions are de-randomized by the probability chance constraint technique and expected value method respectively. Then, using CV-based reduction method the proposed optimization models is de-fuzzified and finally, using GRG method via Lingo $$-$$ - 18.0 software, these modified crisp models are solved. Some real-life information is illustrated by providing numerical examples of the proposed approach - which shows how a decision maker controls minimum cost.

Suggested Citation

  • Palash Sahoo, 2024. "Solution of a single-objective based three-stage 4DTP model with information crowdsourcing under disaster relief scenario: a hybrid random type-2 fuzzy approach," International Journal of System Assurance Engineering and Management, Springer;The Society for Reliability, Engineering Quality and Operations Management (SREQOM),India, and Division of Operation and Maintenance, Lulea University of Technology, Sweden, vol. 15(10), pages 4668-4713, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:ijsaem:v:15:y:2024:i:10:d:10.1007_s13198-024-02389-6
    DOI: 10.1007/s13198-024-02389-6
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s13198-024-02389-6
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s13198-024-02389-6?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Pradip Kundu & Samarjit Kar & Manoranjan Maiti, 2014. "Multi-objective solid transportation problems with budget constraint in uncertain environment," International Journal of Systems Science, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 45(8), pages 1668-1682, August.
    2. Erica Gralla & Jarrod Goentzel & Charles Fine, 2014. "Assessing Trade-offs among Multiple Objectives for Humanitarian Aid Delivery Using Expert Preferences," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 23(6), pages 978-989, June.
    3. Altay, Nezih & Green III, Walter G., 2006. "OR/MS research in disaster operations management," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 175(1), pages 475-493, November.
    4. Caunhye, Aakil M. & Nie, Xiaofeng & Pokharel, Shaligram, 2012. "Optimization models in emergency logistics: A literature review," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 46(1), pages 4-13.
    5. J W Chinneck & K Ramadan, 2000. "Linear programming with interval coefficients," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 51(2), pages 209-220, February.
    6. Sharmistha Halder Jana & Biswapati Jana & Barun Das & Goutam Panigrahi & Manoranjan Maiti, 2019. "Constrained FC 4D MITPs for Damageable Substitutable and Complementary Items in Rough Environments," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 7(3), pages 1-26, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Rodríguez-Espíndola, Oscar & Ahmadi, Hossein & Gastélum-Chavira, Diego & Ahumada-Valenzuela, Omar & Chowdhury, Soumyadeb & Dey, Prasanta Kumar & Albores, Pavel, 2023. "Humanitarian logistics optimization models: An investigation of decision-maker involvement and directions to promote implementation," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 89(C).
    2. Kovacs, Gyöngyi & Moshtari, Mohammad, 2019. "A roadmap for higher research quality in humanitarian operations: A methodological perspective," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 276(2), pages 395-408.
    3. Gutjahr, Walter J. & Nolz, Pamela C., 2016. "Multicriteria optimization in humanitarian aid," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 252(2), pages 351-366.
    4. Renata Turkeš & Daniel Palhazi Cuervo & Kenneth Sörensen, 2019. "Pre-positioning of emergency supplies: does putting a price on human life help to save lives?," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 283(1), pages 865-895, December.
    5. Gralla, Erica & Goentzel, Jarrod, 2018. "Humanitarian transportation planning: Evaluation of practice-based heuristics and recommendations for improvement," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 269(2), pages 436-450.
    6. Rezaei-Malek, Mohammad & Tavakkoli-Moghaddam, Reza & Cheikhrouhou, Naoufel & Taheri-Moghaddam, Alireza, 2016. "An approximation approach to a trade-off among efficiency, efficacy, and balance for relief pre-positioning in disaster management," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 93(C), pages 485-509.
    7. Noham, Reut & Tzur, Michal, 2018. "Designing humanitarian supply chains by incorporating actual post-disaster decisions," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 265(3), pages 1064-1077.
    8. Abderrahmen Mediouni & Nicolas Zufferey & Nachiappan Subramanian & Naoufel Cheikhrouhou, 2019. "Fit between humanitarian professionals and project requirements: hybrid group decision procedure to reduce uncertainty in decision-making," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 283(1), pages 471-496, December.
    9. Lu, Chung-Cheng & Ying, Kuo-Ching & Chen, Hui-Ju, 2016. "Real-time relief distribution in the aftermath of disasters – A rolling horizon approach," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 93(C), pages 1-20.
    10. Melissa Gama & Bruno Filipe Santos & Maria Paola Scaparra, 2016. "A multi-period shelter location-allocation model with evacuation orders for flood disasters," EURO Journal on Computational Optimization, Springer;EURO - The Association of European Operational Research Societies, vol. 4(3), pages 299-323, September.
    11. Aurelie Charles & Matthieu Lauras & Luk N. van Wassenhove & Lionel Dupont, 2016. "Designing an efficient humanitarian supply network," Post-Print hal-01532132, HAL.
    12. Battarra, Maria & Balcik, Burcu & Xu, Huifu, 2018. "Disaster preparedness using risk-assessment methods from earthquake engineering," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 269(2), pages 423-435.
    13. Qi, Mingyao & Yang, Ying & Cheng, Chun, 2023. "Location and inventory pre-positioning problem under uncertainty," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 177(C).
    14. Shaoqing Geng & Yu Gong & Hanping Hou & Jianliang Yang & Bhakti Stephan Onggo, 2024. "Resource management in disaster relief: a bibliometric and content-analysis-based literature review," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 343(1), pages 263-292, December.
    15. Abhishek Behl & Pankaj Dutta, 2019. "Humanitarian supply chain management: a thematic literature review and future directions of research," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 283(1), pages 1001-1044, December.
    16. Stienen, V.F. & Wagenaar, J.C. & den Hertog, D. & Fleuren, H.A., 2021. "Optimal depot locations for humanitarian logistics service providers using robust optimization," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 104(C).
    17. Kınay, Ömer Burak & Yetis Kara, Bahar & Saldanha-da-Gama, Francisco & Correia, Isabel, 2018. "Modeling the shelter site location problem using chance constraints: A case study for Istanbul," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 270(1), pages 132-145.
    18. Zhongzhen Yang & Liquan Guo & Zaili Yang, 2019. "Emergency logistics for wildfire suppression based on forecasted disaster evolution," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 283(1), pages 917-937, December.
    19. Rodríguez-Espíndola, Oscar & Albores, Pavel & Brewster, Christopher, 2018. "Dynamic formulation for humanitarian response operations incorporating multiple organisations," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 204(C), pages 83-98.
    20. Peters, Koen & Fleuren, H.A. & den Hertog, Dick & Kavelj, Mirjana & Silva, Sergio & Goncalves, Rui & Ergun, Ozlem & Soldner, Mallory, 2016. "The Nutritious Supply Chain : Optimizing Humanitarian Food Aid," Discussion Paper 2016-044, Tilburg University, Center for Economic Research.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:ijsaem:v:15:y:2024:i:10:d:10.1007_s13198-024-02389-6. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.