IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/ijsaem/v13y2022i1d10.1007_s13198-021-01140-9.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Systematic risks assessment of precast concrete canal in irrigation projects using DEMATEL method

Author

Listed:
  • Hamzeh Dehghani

    (Higher Education Complex of Bam)

  • Ali Hormozi

    (Islamic Azad University)

  • Mansour Nikpour

    (Islamic Azad University)

Abstract

Traditional and low efficiency of water use will not be able to meet the current trends in agricultural development, therefore water consumption is the most crucial issue. In this regard, One of the best ways to increase water resources is to promote existing water systems and thus provide more water. For this aim, the construction of terrestrial canals has been changed to precast concrete canals. The construction of precast concrete canals is an uncertain process therefore an accurate evaluation of risk for the success of this project, is necessary. A case study of a precast concrete canal to transfer water in the Sistan plain of Iran is presented. A total of eight potential risks is selected on the basis of the precast concrete canal construction process through Delphi method. By using the Decision Making Trial and Evaluation Laboratory (DEMATEL), the risks at the most critical status, associated with process of construction, is determined.

Suggested Citation

  • Hamzeh Dehghani & Ali Hormozi & Mansour Nikpour, 2022. "Systematic risks assessment of precast concrete canal in irrigation projects using DEMATEL method," International Journal of System Assurance Engineering and Management, Springer;The Society for Reliability, Engineering Quality and Operations Management (SREQOM),India, and Division of Operation and Maintenance, Lulea University of Technology, Sweden, vol. 13(1), pages 123-130, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:ijsaem:v:13:y:2022:i:1:d:10.1007_s13198-021-01140-9
    DOI: 10.1007/s13198-021-01140-9
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s13198-021-01140-9
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s13198-021-01140-9?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Scott Baker & David Ponniah & Simon Smith, 1999. "Risk response techniques employed currently for major projects," Construction Management and Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 17(2), pages 205-213.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Beata Sadowska & Adam Lulek, 2018. "The problem of risk in the economy of sustainable development on the example of the State Forests," Ekonomia i Prawo, Uniwersytet Mikolaja Kopernika, vol. 17(1), pages 103-120, March.
    2. Fan, Miao & Lin, Neng-Pai & Sheu, Chwen, 2008. "Choosing a project risk-handling strategy: An analytical model," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 112(2), pages 700-713, April.
    3. Hadi Sarvari & Alireza Valipour & Nordin Yahya & Norhazilan MD Noor & Michael Beer & Nerija Banaitiene, 2019. "Approaches to Risk Identification in Public–Private Partnership Projects: Malaysian Private Partners’ Overview," Administrative Sciences, MDPI, vol. 9(1), pages 1-18, February.
    4. Weddy Bernadi Sudirman & Sarwono Hardjomuljadi, 2011. "Project Risk Management in Hydropower Plant Projects," Journal of Infrastructure Development, India Development Foundation, vol. 3(2), pages 171-186, December.
    5. Naomi Brookes, 2012. "What is engineering construction and why is it important? Towards a research agenda," Construction Management and Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 30(8), pages 603-607, August.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:ijsaem:v:13:y:2022:i:1:d:10.1007_s13198-021-01140-9. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.