IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/ijsaem/v10y2019i2d10.1007_s13198-019-00778-w.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Cybersecurity for eMaintenance in railway infrastructure: risks and consequences

Author

Listed:
  • Adithya Thaduri

    (Luleå University of Technology)

  • Mustafa Aljumaili

    (Luleå University of Technology)

  • Ravdeep Kour

    (Luleå University of Technology)

  • Ramin Karim

    (Luleå University of Technology)

Abstract

Recently, due to the advancements in the Information and Communication Technology, there has been lot of emphasis on digitization of the existing and newly developed infrastructure. In transportation infrastructure, in general, 80% of the assets are already in place and there has been tremendous push to move to the digital era. For efficient and effective design, construction, operation and maintenance of the infrastructure, due to this digitization, there is increasing research trend in data-driven decision-making algorithms that are proved to be effective because of several advantages. Since railway is the backbone of the society, the data-driven approaches will ensure the continuous operation, efficient maintenance, planning and potential future investments. The breach and leak of this potential data to the wrong hands might result in havoc, risk, trust, hazards and serious consequences. Hence, the main purpose of this paper is to stress the potential challenges, consequences, threats, vulnerabilities and risk management of data security in the railway infrastructure in context of eMaintenance. In addition, this paper also identifies the research methods to obtain and secure this data for potential possible research.

Suggested Citation

  • Adithya Thaduri & Mustafa Aljumaili & Ravdeep Kour & Ramin Karim, 2019. "Cybersecurity for eMaintenance in railway infrastructure: risks and consequences," International Journal of System Assurance Engineering and Management, Springer;The Society for Reliability, Engineering Quality and Operations Management (SREQOM),India, and Division of Operation and Maintenance, Lulea University of Technology, Sweden, vol. 10(2), pages 149-159, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:ijsaem:v:10:y:2019:i:2:d:10.1007_s13198-019-00778-w
    DOI: 10.1007/s13198-019-00778-w
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s13198-019-00778-w
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s13198-019-00778-w?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Anna Nagurney & Patrizia Daniele & Shivani Shukla, 2017. "A supply chain network game theory model of cybersecurity investments with nonlinear budget constraints," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 248(1), pages 405-427, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Amit Patwardhan & Adithya Thaduri & Ramin Karim, 2021. "Distributed Ledger for Cybersecurity: Issues and Challenges in Railways," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(18), pages 1-19, September.
    2. Alice Consilvio & José Solís-Hernández & Noemi Jiménez-Redondo & Paolo Sanetti & Federico Papa & Iñigo Mingolarra-Garaizar, 2020. "On Applying Machine Learning and Simulative Approaches to Railway Asset Management: The Earthworks and Track Circuits Case Studies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(6), pages 1-24, March.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Michel Dacorogna & Marie Kratz, 2022. "Special Issue “Cyber Risk and Security”," Risks, MDPI, vol. 10(6), pages 1-4, May.
    2. E. Allevi & A. Gnudi & I. V. Konnov & G. Oggioni, 2018. "Evaluating the effects of environmental regulations on a closed-loop supply chain network: a variational inequality approach," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 261(1), pages 1-43, February.
    3. Isa Feyzian-Tary & Jafar Razmi & Mohamad Sadegh Sangari, 2018. "A variational inequality formulation for designing a multi-echelon, multi-product supply chain network in a competitive environment," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 264(1), pages 89-121, May.
    4. Lu Xu & Yanhui Li & Qi Yao, 2022. "Information security investment and purchase decision for personalized products," Managerial and Decision Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 43(6), pages 2619-2635, September.
    5. Yaoguang Zhong & Fangfang Guo & Zhiqiang Wang & Huajun Tang, 2019. "Coordination Analysis of Revenue Sharing in E-Commerce Logistics Service Supply Chain With Cooperative Distribution," SAGE Open, , vol. 9(3), pages 21582440198, August.
    6. Nagurney, Anna & Shukla, Shivani & Nagurney, Ladimer S. & Saberi, Sara, 2018. "A game theory model for freight service provision security investments for high-value cargo," Economics of Transportation, Elsevier, vol. 16(C), pages 21-28.
    7. Peiyue Cheng & Guitao Zhang & Hao Sun, 2022. "The Sustainable Supply Chain Network Competition Based on Non-Cooperative Equilibrium under Carbon Emission Permits," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 10(9), pages 1-31, April.
    8. Yu, Min & Cruz, Jose M. & Li, Dong Michelle, 2019. "The sustainable supply chain network competition with environmental tax policies," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 217(C), pages 218-231.
    9. Gabriella Colajanni & Daniele Sciacca, 2023. "Multi-Layer 5G Network Slicing with UAVs: An Optimization Model," Networks and Spatial Economics, Springer, vol. 23(3), pages 755-769, September.
    10. Xing Gao & Siyu Gong, 2022. "An economic analysis of information security outsourcing with competitive firms," Managerial and Decision Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 43(7), pages 2748-2758, October.
    11. Gabriella Colajanni & Patrizia Daniele, 2022. "A Mathematical Network Model and a Solution Algorithm for IaaS Cloud Computing," Networks and Spatial Economics, Springer, vol. 22(2), pages 267-287, June.
    12. Wen Jiang & Zeyu Ma & Xinyang Deng, 2019. "An attack-defense game based reliability analysis approach for wireless sensor networks," International Journal of Distributed Sensor Networks, , vol. 15(4), pages 15501477198, April.
    13. Fenling Feng & Tianzuo Zhang & Chengguang Liu & Lifeng Fan, 2020. "China Railway Express Subsidy Model Based on Game Theory under “the Belt and Road” Initiative," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(5), pages 1-16, March.
    14. Sung Hoon Chung & Robert D. Weaver & Hyun Woo Jeon, 2020. "Sustainable Management of Remanufacturing in Dynamic Supply Chains," Networks and Spatial Economics, Springer, vol. 20(3), pages 703-731, September.
    15. Nagurney, Anna & Salarpour, Mojtaba & Daniele, Patrizia, 2019. "An integrated financial and logistical game theory model for humanitarian organizations with purchasing costs, multiple freight service providers, and budget, capacity, and demand constraints," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 212(C), pages 212-226.
    16. Nagurney, Anna, 2022. "Attracting international migrant labor: Investment optimization to alleviate supply chain labor shortages," Operations Research Perspectives, Elsevier, vol. 9(C).
    17. Yongtao Peng & Bohai Chen & Eleonora Veglianti, 2022. "Platform Service Supply Chain Network Equilibrium Model with Data Empowerment," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-21, April.
    18. Cheung, Kam-Fung & Bell, Michael G.H. & Bhattacharjya, Jyotirmoyee, 2021. "Cybersecurity in logistics and supply chain management: An overview and future research directions," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 146(C).
    19. Wei Liu & Chan He, 2018. "Equilibrium Conditions of a Logistics Service Supply Chain with a New Smoothing Algorithm," Asia-Pacific Journal of Operational Research (APJOR), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 35(02), pages 1-22, April.
    20. Longfei He & Qinxu Gu & Junsong Bian & Kin Keung Lai & Xiao Zhang, 2023. "To Pool or Not to Pool in Carbon Quotas: Analyses of Emission Regulation and Operations in Supply Chain Supernetwork under Cap-and-Trade Policy," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 324(1), pages 311-353, May.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:ijsaem:v:10:y:2019:i:2:d:10.1007_s13198-019-00778-w. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.