IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/ijphth/v61y2016i2d10.1007_s00038-015-0764-x.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Preferred flavors and reasons for e-cigarette use and discontinued use among never, current, and former smokers

Author

Listed:
  • Carla J. Berg

    (Emory University School of Public Health)

Abstract

Objectives To compare e-cigarette flavors preferred and reasons for use and discontinued use across never, current, and former e-cigarette users and cigarette smokers. Methods We recruited 1567 participants aged 18–34 years through Facebook ads targeting tobacco users and nonusers in August 2014 to complete an online survey. We assessed tobacco use, preferred flavors, and reasons for e-cigarette use and discontinued use. Results Our sample was 49 % male, 87 % White; 56 % current cigarette smokers; and 53 % e-cigarette users. Current e-cigarette users used an average of 20.9 days in the past 30 (SD = 11.7) and 55.2 puffs/day (SD = 37.3). Compared to never and current smokers, former smokers used e-cigarettes more frequently (p’s

Suggested Citation

  • Carla J. Berg, 2016. "Preferred flavors and reasons for e-cigarette use and discontinued use among never, current, and former smokers," International Journal of Public Health, Springer;Swiss School of Public Health (SSPH+), vol. 61(2), pages 225-236, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:ijphth:v:61:y:2016:i:2:d:10.1007_s00038-015-0764-x
    DOI: 10.1007/s00038-015-0764-x
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s00038-015-0764-x
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s00038-015-0764-x?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Kathryn Rosbrook & Hanno C Erythropel & Tamara M DeWinter & Mark Falinski & Stephanie O’Malley & Suchitra Krishnan-Sarin & Paul T Anastas & Julie B Zimmerman & Barry G Green, 2017. "The effect of sucralose on flavor sweetness in electronic cigarettes varies between delivery devices," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 12(10), pages 1-14, October.
    2. Neil McKeganey & Tiffany Dickson, 2017. "Why Don’t More Smokers Switch to Using E-Cigarettes: The Views of Confirmed Smokers," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 14(6), pages 1-12, June.
    3. Brian L. Rostron & Joanne T. Chang & Cindy M. Chang & Rebecca A. Jackson & Bridget K. Ambrose, 2020. "ENDS Flavor Preference by Menthol Cigarette Smoking Status among US Adults, 2018–2019," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(1), pages 1-8, December.
    4. Carla J. Berg & Albert Melena & Friedner D. Wittman & Tomas Robles & Lisa Henriksen, 2022. "The Reshaping of the E-Cigarette Retail Environment: Its Evolution and Public Health Concerns," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(14), pages 1-13, July.
    5. Liane M. Schneller & Maansi Bansal-Travers & Maciej L. Goniewicz & Scott McIntosh & Deborah Ossip & Richard J. O’Connor, 2019. "Use of Flavored E-Cigarettes and the Type of E-Cigarette Devices Used among Adults and Youth in the US—Results from Wave 3 of the Population Assessment of Tobacco and Health Study (2015–2016)," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(16), pages 1-12, August.
    6. Mohammed M. Alqahtani & Zachary B. Massey & Robert T. Fairman & Victoria Churchill & David L. Ashley & Lucy Popova, 2022. "General and Device-Specific Reasons for ENDS Use: A Qualitative Study with Adult ENDS Users," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(11), pages 1-14, June.
    7. John Buckell & Joachim Marti & Jody L. Sindelar, 2017. "Should Flavors be Banned in E-cigarettes? Evidence on Adult Smokers and Recent Quitters from a Discrete Choice Experiment," NBER Working Papers 23865, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    8. Kim AGJ Romijnders & Erna JZ Krüsemann & Sanne Boesveldt & Kees de Graaf & Hein de Vries & Reinskje Talhout, 2019. "E-Liquid Flavor Preferences and Individual Factors Related to Vaping: A Survey among Dutch Never-Users, Smokers, Dual Users, and Exclusive Vapers," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(23), pages 1-15, November.
    9. Kim A. G. J. Romijnders & Liesbeth Van Osch & Hein De Vries & Reinskje Talhout, 2018. "Perceptions and Reasons Regarding E-Cigarette Use among Users and Non-Users: A Narrative Literature Review," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 15(6), pages 1-19, June.
    10. Joachim Marti & John Buckell & Johanna Catherine Maclean & Jody Sindelar, 2019. "To “Vape” Or Smoke? Experimental Evidence On Adult Smokers," Economic Inquiry, Western Economic Association International, vol. 57(1), pages 705-725, January.
    11. Christine E. Kistler & Trisha M. Crutchfield & Erin L. Sutfin & Leah M. Ranney & Micah L. Berman & Gary A. Zarkin & Adam O. Goldstein, 2017. "Consumers’ Preferences for Electronic Nicotine Delivery System Product Features: A Structured Content Analysis," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 14(6), pages 1-10, June.
    12. Zachary R. Dunbar & Gary Giovino & Binnian Wei & Richard J. O’Connor & Maciej L. Goniewicz & Mark J. Travers, 2020. "Use of Electronic Cigarettes in Smoke-Free Spaces by Smokers: Results from the 2014–2015 Population Assessment on Tobacco and Health Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(3), pages 1-16, February.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:ijphth:v:61:y:2016:i:2:d:10.1007_s00038-015-0764-x. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.