IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/ijogbc/v19y2024i1d10.1007_s42943-024-00091-9.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Fostering Academia–Industry R&D Partnerships: A Study in the Indian Context Using Mixed Methods Approach

Author

Listed:
  • Mahak Bisen

    (Indian Institute of Technology Madras)

  • Prakash Sai Lokachari

    (Indian Institute of Technology Madras)

Abstract

While existing studies demonstrated how academia–industry partnerships have contributed to R&D knowledge accumulation and technology transfer, the present study explores the multiple facets of academia–industry R&D partnerships that foster effective collaboration between the relevant stakeholders. Advanced Manufacturing Technology Development Center (AMTDC), a Center of Excellence (CoE) established in the Indian Institute of Technology (IIT) Madras Research Park, is chosen for this study. The study adopted a mixed methods approach by employing Interactive Qualitative Analysis (IQA) and Importance-Performance Analysis (IPA). IQA identified the factors influencing successful partnerships at the Center. The IQA findings suggest that 'Team Cohesion' is the primary driver and 'Center Reputation' is the primary outcome of successful R&D partnerships. The study compared academic and industry partners' perceived importance and performance of the enabling factors by employing the IPA. The IPA findings highlighted differences in partners' actions and expectations. The study findings contribute to the existing literature on academia–industry collaborations and partnerships. The study has implications for strengthening ties between academic and industry partners for the team's consideration.

Suggested Citation

  • Mahak Bisen & Prakash Sai Lokachari, 2024. "Fostering Academia–Industry R&D Partnerships: A Study in the Indian Context Using Mixed Methods Approach," International Journal of Global Business and Competitiveness, Springer, vol. 19(1), pages 1-13, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:ijogbc:v:19:y:2024:i:1:d:10.1007_s42943-024-00091-9
    DOI: 10.1007/s42943-024-00091-9
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s42943-024-00091-9
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s42943-024-00091-9?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ankrah, Samuel & AL-Tabbaa, Omar, 2015. "Universities–industry collaboration: A systematic review," Scandinavian Journal of Management, Elsevier, vol. 31(3), pages 387-408.
    2. Etzkowitz, Henry & Leydesdorff, Loet, 2000. "The dynamics of innovation: from National Systems and "Mode 2" to a Triple Helix of university-industry-government relations," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 29(2), pages 109-123, February.
    3. Alice Bertoletti & Geraint Johnes, 2021. "Efficiency in university-industry collaboration: an analysis of UK higher education institutions," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 126(9), pages 7679-7714, September.
    4. Albert Banal-Estañol & Inés Macho-Stadler & David Pérez-Castrillo, 2018. "Endogenous Matching in University-Industry Collaboration: Theory and Empirical Evidence from the United Kingdom," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 64(4), pages 1591-1608, April.
    5. Wang, Chun-Hsien & Chang, Ching-Hsing & Shen, George C., 2015. "The effect of inbound open innovation on firm performance: Evidence from high-tech industry," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 99(C), pages 222-230.
    6. Sew Huey Ting & Sofri Yahya & Cheng Ling Tan, 2020. "Importance-Performance Matrix Analysis of the Researcher’s Competence in the Formation of University-Industry Collaboration Using Smart PLS," Public Organization Review, Springer, vol. 20(2), pages 249-275, June.
    7. Natália L. Figueiredo & João J. M. Ferreira, 2022. "More than meets the partner: a systematic review and agenda for University–Industry cooperation," Management Review Quarterly, Springer, vol. 72(1), pages 231-273, February.
    8. T. Theeranattapong & D. Pickernell & C. Simms, 2021. "Systematic literature review paper: the regional innovation system-university-science park nexus," The Journal of Technology Transfer, Springer, vol. 46(6), pages 2017-2050, December.
    9. Perkmann, Markus & Tartari, Valentina & McKelvey, Maureen & Autio, Erkko & Broström, Anders & D’Este, Pablo & Fini, Riccardo & Geuna, Aldo & Grimaldi, Rosa & Hughes, Alan & Krabel, Stefan & Kitson, Mi, 2013. "Academic engagement and commercialisation: A review of the literature on university–industry relations," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 42(2), pages 423-442.
    10. De Silva, Muthu & Al-Tabbaa, Omar & Pinto, Jonathan, 2023. "Academics engaging in knowledge transfer and co-creation: Push causation and pull effectuation?," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 52(2).
    11. Sujit Bhattacharya & Praveen Arora, 2007. "Industrial linkages in Indian universities: What they reveal and what they imply?," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 70(2), pages 277-300, February.
    12. Maietta, Ornella Wanda, 2015. "Determinants of university–firm R&D collaboration and its impact on innovation: A perspective from a low-tech industry," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 44(7), pages 1341-1359.
    13. Craig Boardman & Denis Gray, 2010. "The new science and engineering management: cooperative research centers as government policies, industry strategies, and organizations," The Journal of Technology Transfer, Springer, vol. 35(5), pages 445-459, October.
    14. Johan Marx & Cecilia Jacoba de Swardt, 2023. "An interactive qualitative analysis of academics’ views of a competency-based undergraduate qualification in risk management," Qualitative Research in Financial Markets, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 15(3), pages 471-494, January.
    15. Callaert, Julie & Landoni, Paolo & Van Looy, Bart & Verganti, Roberto, 2015. "Scientific yield from collaboration with industry: The relevance of researchers’ strategic approaches," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 44(4), pages 990-998.
    16. Malik, Tariq H., 2013. "National institutional differences and cross-border university–industry knowledge transfer," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 42(3), pages 776-787.
    17. Laura Lecluyse & Mirjam Knockaert & André Spithoven, 2019. "The contribution of science parks: a literature review and future research agenda," The Journal of Technology Transfer, Springer, vol. 44(2), pages 559-595, April.
    18. Datta, Surja & Saad, Mohammed & Sarpong, David, 2019. "National systems of innovation, innovation niches, and diversity in university systems," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 143(C), pages 27-36.
    19. Denisa Mindruta, 2013. "Value creation in university-firm research collaborations: A matching approach," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 34(6), pages 644-665, June.
    20. Maietta, Ornella Wanda, 2015. "Determinants of R&D University-Frim Collaboration and Its Impact on Innovation: a Perspective from the Italian Food and Drink Industry," 2015 Conference, August 9-14, 2015, Milan, Italy 225668, International Association of Agricultural Economists.
    21. Ramya Ravi & Manthan D. Janodia, 2022. "University-Industry Technology Transfer in India: a Plausible Model Based on Success Stories from the USA, Japan, and Israel," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 13(2), pages 1692-1713, June.
    22. Ramya Ravi & Manthan D. Janodia, 2022. "Factors Affecting Technology Transfer and Commercialization of University Research in India: a Cross-sectional Study," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 13(1), pages 787-803, March.
    23. Gustavo Behling & Fernando César Lenzi & Carlos Ricardo Rossetto, 2022. "Upcoming Issues, New Methods: Using Interactive Qualitative Analysis (IQA) in Management Research," RAC - Revista de Administração Contemporânea (Journal of Contemporary Administration), ANPAD - Associação Nacional de Pós-Graduação e Pesquisa em Administração, vol. 26(4), pages 200417-2004.
    24. Robert Rybnicek & Roland Königsgruber, 2019. "What makes industry–university collaboration succeed? A systematic review of the literature," Journal of Business Economics, Springer, vol. 89(2), pages 221-250, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Adegbile, Abiodun Samuel & Sarpong, David & Kolade, Oluwaseun, 2021. "Environments for Joint University-Industry Laboratories (JUIL): Micro-level dimensions and research implications," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 170(C).
    2. Annita Nugent & Ho Fai Chan & Uwe Dulleck, 2022. "Government funding of university-industry collaboration: exploring the impact of targeted funding on university patent activity," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 127(1), pages 29-73, January.
    3. Natalya Radko & Maksim Belitski & Yelena Kalyuzhnova, 2023. "Conceptualising the entrepreneurial university: the stakeholder approach," The Journal of Technology Transfer, Springer, vol. 48(3), pages 955-1044, June.
    4. Villani, Elisa & Rasmussen, Einar & Grimaldi, Rosa, 2017. "How intermediary organizations facilitate university–industry technology transfer: A proximity approach," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 114(C), pages 86-102.
    5. Roncancio-Marin, Jason & Dentchev, Nikolay & Guerrero, Maribel & Díaz-González, Abel & Crispeels, Thomas, 2022. "University-Industry joint undertakings with high societal impact: A micro-processes approach," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 174(C).
    6. Uwe Cantner & Martin Kalthaus & Indira Yarullina, 2024. "Outcomes of science-industry collaboration: factors and interdependencies," The Journal of Technology Transfer, Springer, vol. 49(2), pages 542-580, April.
    7. Shi, Xing & Wu, Yanrui & Fu, Dahai, 2020. "Does University-Industry collaboration improve innovation efficiency? Evidence from Chinese Firms⋄," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 86(C), pages 39-53.
    8. Adele Parmentola & Marco Ferretti & Eva Panetti, 2021. "Exploring the university-industry cooperation in a low innovative region. What differences between low tech and high tech industries?," International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, Springer, vol. 17(3), pages 1469-1496, September.
    9. Alexandre Dias & Beatriz Selan, 2023. "How does university-industry collaboration relate to research resources and technical-scientific activities? An analysis at the laboratory level," The Journal of Technology Transfer, Springer, vol. 48(1), pages 392-415, February.
    10. Noman Arshed & Waqas Ahmad & Uzma Hanif, 2022. "A Spatial Temporal Exploration of Factors Motivating Academia-Industry Collaboration," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 13(1), pages 521-540, March.
    11. Yongli Tang & Kazuyuki Motohashi & Xinyue Hu & Angeles Montoro-Sanchez, 2020. "University-industry interaction and product innovation performance of Guangdong manufacturing firms: the roles of regional proximity and research quality of universities," The Journal of Technology Transfer, Springer, vol. 45(2), pages 578-618, April.
    12. Yuandi Wang & Die Hu & Weiping Li & Yiwei Li & Qiang Li, 2015. "Collaboration strategies and effects on university research: evidence from Chinese universities," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 103(2), pages 725-749, May.
    13. Borah, Dhruba & Massini, Silvia & Malik, Khaleel, 2023. "Teaching benefits of multi-helix university-industry research collaborations: Towards a holistic framework," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 52(8).
    14. Shuman Zhang & Changhong Yuan & Chen Han, 2020. "Industry–university–research alliance portfolio size and firm performance: the contingent role of political connections," The Journal of Technology Transfer, Springer, vol. 45(5), pages 1505-1534, October.
    15. Lascaux, Alexander, 2019. "Absorptive Capacity, Research Output Sharing, and Research Output Capture in University-Industry Partnerships," Scandinavian Journal of Management, Elsevier, vol. 35(3).
    16. Balzhan Orazbayeva & Carolin Plewa & Todd Davey & Victoria Galán-Muros, 2019. "The future of University-Business Cooperation: research and practice priorities," Post-Print hal-02880384, HAL.
    17. Diekhoff, Josefine & Krieger, Bastian & Licht, Georg & Rammer, Christian, 2019. "Stand der Messung von Interaktionen zwischen Wissenschaft und Wirtschaft im internationalen Vergleich," ZEW Expertises, ZEW - Leibniz Centre for European Economic Research, number 248650.
    18. Gibson, Elizabeth & Daim, Tugrul U. & Dabic, Marina, 2019. "Evaluating university industry collaborative research centers," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 146(C), pages 181-202.
    19. Quentin Plantec & Benjamin Cabanes & Pascal Le Masson & Benoit Weil, 2021. "Market-Pull Or Research Push? Effects Of Research Orientations On University-Industry Collaborative Ph.D. Projects' Performances," Post-Print halshs-03190142, HAL.
    20. Jiang, Renai & Jefferson, Gary H. & Zucker, Sam & Li, Lintong, 2019. "The role of research and ownership collaboration in generating patent quality: China-U.S comparisons," China Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 58(C).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Academia–Industry R&D partnerships; Center of Excellence; Research Park; Interactive Qualitative Analysis; Importance-Performance Analysis;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • I23 - Health, Education, and Welfare - - Education - - - Higher Education; Research Institutions
    • O31 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Innovation; Research and Development; Technological Change; Intellectual Property Rights - - - Innovation and Invention: Processes and Incentives
    • O32 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Innovation; Research and Development; Technological Change; Intellectual Property Rights - - - Management of Technological Innovation and R&D

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:ijogbc:v:19:y:2024:i:1:d:10.1007_s42943-024-00091-9. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.