IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/ijocsr/v2y2017i1d10.1186_s40991-017-0019-7.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A research-informed model for corporate social responsibility: towards accountability to impacted stakeholders

Author

Listed:
  • Dyann Ross

    (University of the Sunshine Coast)

Abstract

An Australian case study is presented of an ongoing conflict between Alcoa World Alumina, a multi-national mining company and the impacted stakeholders of Yarloop, a small rural community in Western Australia. The conflict has been subject to research by the author since the early 2000s and is the impetus for developing a model for corporate social responsibility (CSR). The model emphasises engaging impacted stakeholders in dialogue with powerful stakeholders to achieve social justice. This involves a three way set of relationships with key people in leadership positions from the relevant government departments, the corporation’s management group and the impacted stakeholders. The model is premised on an ethic of love approach which utilises the ideas of social justice, social sustainability, and the social pre-cautionary principle. An outline is presented of these ideas as well as a set of inter-linked strategies which are responsive to power inequalities in conflict situations. The ideas and strategies can guide efforts to address the social costs incurred by the impacted community stakeholders. This will involve a discerning commitment to work towards accountable government, sustainable business practices and social justice for impacted stakeholders. The approach requires a cultural shift in the business sector, and wider society, to equally value people, place and profit.

Suggested Citation

  • Dyann Ross, 2017. "A research-informed model for corporate social responsibility: towards accountability to impacted stakeholders," International Journal of Corporate Social Responsibility, Springer, vol. 2(1), pages 1-11, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:ijocsr:v:2:y:2017:i:1:d:10.1186_s40991-017-0019-7
    DOI: 10.1186/s40991-017-0019-7
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1186/s40991-017-0019-7
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1186/s40991-017-0019-7?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Annette Weier & Paul Loke, 2007. "Precaution and the Precautionary Principle: two Australian case studies," Staff Working Papers 0705, Productivity Commission, Government of Australia.
    2. Maria Aluchna, 2017. "Is Corporate Social Responsibility Sustainable? A Critical Approach," CSR, Sustainability, Ethics & Governance, in: Maria Aluchna & Samuel O. Idowu (ed.), The Dynamics of Corporate Social Responsibility, chapter 0, pages 9-25, Springer.
    3. Samuel O. Idowu & Maria Aluchna, 2017. "Dynamics of Corporate Social Responsibility: A Critical Approach to Theory and Practice: An Introduction," CSR, Sustainability, Ethics & Governance, in: Maria Aluchna & Samuel O. Idowu (ed.), The Dynamics of Corporate Social Responsibility, chapter 0, pages 1-6, Springer.
    4. Samuel O. Idowu, 2016. "Corporate Social Responsibility Initiatives From Around the World: An Introduction," CSR, Sustainability, Ethics & Governance, in: Samuel O. Idowu (ed.), Key Initiatives in Corporate Social Responsibility, chapter 0, pages 1-18, Springer.
    5. Weier, Annette & Loke, Paul, 2007. "Precaution and the Precautionary Principle: two Australian case studies," Staff Working Papers 8021, Productivity Commission.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Emilio Abad-Segura & Francisco Joaquín Cortés-García & Luis J. Belmonte-Ureña, 2019. "The Sustainable Approach to Corporate Social Responsibility: A Global Analysis and Future Trends," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(19), pages 1-24, September.
    2. Lyon Salia Awuah & Kwame Oduro Amoako & Stephen Yeboah & Emmanuel Opoku Marfo & Peter Ansu-Mensah, 2021. "Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR): motivations and challenges of a Multinational Enterprise (MNE) subsidiary’s engagement with host communities in Ghana," International Journal of Corporate Social Responsibility, Springer, vol. 6(1), pages 1-13, December.
    3. Mallika Tamvada, 2020. "Corporate social responsibility and accountability: a new theoretical foundation for regulating CSR," International Journal of Corporate Social Responsibility, Springer, vol. 5(1), pages 1-14, December.
    4. Edward Fosu & Kaigang Yi & Deborah Asiedu, 2024. "The effect of CSR on corporate social performance: Mediating role of corporate image, green innovation and moderating role of corporate identity," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 31(1), pages 69-88, January.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Wenxuan Yu & Abeer Hassan & Mahalaxmi Adhikariparajuli, 2022. "How Did Amazon Achieve CSR and Some Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)—Climate Change, Circular Economy, Water Resources and Employee Rights during COVID-19?," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 15(8), pages 1-18, August.
    2. Doddy Setiawan & Rayenda Khresna Brahmana & Andi Asrihapsari & Siti Maisaroh, 2021. "Does a Foreign Board Improve Corporate Social Responsibility?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(20), pages 1-17, October.
    3. Syed Alamdar Ali Shah, 2019. "Integration Of Financial Risks With Non Financial Risks: An Exploratory Study From Pakistani Context," Copernican Journal of Finance & Accounting, Uniwersytet Mikolaja Kopernika, vol. 8(2), pages 49-65.
    4. Rosane Maria Seibert & Clea Beatriz Macagnan & Robert Dixon, 2021. "Priority Stakeholders’ Perception: Social Responsibility Indicators," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(3), pages 1-22, January.
    5. Muttanachai Suttipun & Pankaewta Lakkanawanit & Trairong Swatdikun & Wilawan Dungtripop, 2021. "The Impact of Corporate Social Responsibility on the Financial Performance of Listed Companies in Thailand," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(16), pages 1-14, August.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:ijocsr:v:2:y:2017:i:1:d:10.1186_s40991-017-0019-7. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.